Campaign Mastery helps tabletop RPG GMs knock their players' socks off through tips, how-to articles, and GMing tricks that build memorable campaigns from start to finish.

No Article Today

Just a quick heads-up:

Due to a lengthy doctor’s appointment, I am left without enough time to get today’s article finished. I’ll try to get it finished tomorrow, but have another appointment then, so that might not happen, either.

Apologies are tendered, and I’ll try not to let it happen again – though I’m a little surprised (given my current health problems – see the preface to Stealth Narrative – Imputed info in your game and the footnote to The End Of The Adventure) that I’ve been able to prevent it happening sooner!

Comments (2)

New Beginnings: Phase 9: Completion

new beginnings 10

The campaign is on the verge of blooming as growth sprouts in every direction.

It’s not easy making a completely fresh start. This series examines the process of creating a new campaign in detail, a process that is approaching its conclusion.

Campaign Structure

There isn’t much of a structural nature left undone, or so it must seem – and, truthfully, the bulk of the work is done. But there is a small remainder that demands a little intensive thought.

How is everything going to tie together? You have intrusive game mechanics, practical necessities, the need to interrupt play for what might be a day, a week, a fortnight, a month – or some unpredictable combination and/or multiple of those. There is the necessary interface between experience point awards, other rewards, character progression, and plot to take into account – there’s very little worse than an adventure that over- or under-estimates the capabilities of the PCs at that point in time, but that has to happen for the overall plotline of the campaign to make sense.

These are all global decisions, individually small in nature, but combining to wrap the adventure up in an overall look-and-feel envelope that will encapsulate each adventure. Everything from the degree of continuity from session-to-session through to the style in which play will be synopsized (or even if it will be synopsized) fall into this category.

It’s easy to make these decisions. It’s not easy to ensure that they harmonize with each other, and still harder to ensure that they compliment the adventure content. In fact, it’s all most people can do to try and minimize the level of interference that they impose on the campaign content.

What might surprise those who haven’t thought about it before is that this approach is actually just one step removed from successfully completing that much harder task.

  • Make a list of the decisions that need to be made.
  • Order them in sequence of the amount of in-game content.
  • Make your decisions in that sequence.
  • The criteria are to choose the alternative that:
    • reflects the theme,
    • or, if not, compliments the theme,
    • or, if not, reflects the way the players are expected to react to the theme,
    • or, if not, balances the theme,
    • or, if not, that interfere the least with the theme’s expression.

This could be as simple as ensuring that every negative or downside is paired with a positive or upside, regardless of the relative strength of the elements of an individual pair, or as complicated as ensuring that at certain points in the campaign the balance shifts this way or that. It can be as plot-oriented as ensuring that each synopsis contains dark hints at the relevance to the larger picture, or as metagame-based as giving the players the option of “buying” a treasure/reward preference or substitute with XP that would otherwise go to enhancing their character’s capabilities. There are a multitude of options, but the process listed above will enable you to navigate your way through not to the compromise that interferes the least, but to the compromise that enhances the most.

There is one term in the list above that needs a little further discussion. That word is “balance” and it occurs in the second last basis of judgment. “Balance” doesn’t mean contradicting the theme or playing up the opposite; it means (in this context) grounding the game element so that the players aren’t necessarily feeling the same things as their characters, putting some distance between passionate positions and an impartial position that enables the players to enjoy the theme vicariously.

Adventure Format

One of those global elements needs to be singled out for special attention. Over time, your campaign will develop an individual adventure format whether you create one deliberately or not – but there can be a lot of pain, frustration, and lost opportunity in the meantime. A far better alternative is to create something that is close to what will arise anyway and just tweak and refine it, thereafter.

Each of the campaigns that I run has a different mixture of plot and in-character life. In some cases, only a few minutes (per multi-game-session adventure) for each character brings their lives up to date, with the occasional exception where the personal life of a PC provides the lead-in for a particular adventure. In others, I might spend an hour or more on “social in-character activities” for every hour spent actually advancing the plot agenda. Most fall somewhere between these extremes.

In some cases, these occur in deliberately-inserted “quiet moments” inside the plot, in other cases they precede the adventure. In one of my Fumanor campaigns, I target the mid-adventure session breaks with cliff-hanger endings, while bookending each adventure with “social life” – and again target these with a “personal life” cliffhanger. However, that campaign also had “soft boundaries” – which means that i was content for one adventure to end, and another to begin, mid-game session. (“Hard boundaries”, in contrast, mandate that each adventure ending also ends the day’s game session, demanding “padding” mid-adventure to get the timing more or less right – another of those “global choices” that I mentioned earlier.)

I have run campaigns in which experience was handed out after each conflict, campaigns in which experience was handed out after each game session, campaigns in which experience was handed out after each adventure, and at least one campaign where experience was handed out by note (modern equivalent: email) in between game sessions. Where does this metagame element fit into your adventure format?

I have run campaigns that preceded each social interaction session with a political subplot, and others which preceded it with a James-Bond style Teaser action sequence that did not involve the PCs – these targeted the players, but mandated that I provide a channel by which that information ultimately found its way to the PCs. I used a variety of such channels – everything from security footage to speculation to a mystic’s visions (eventually the players figured out that someone was pulling their strings by “showing” them the things the someone wanted them to see, leading them into the final phase of the campaign). This is a perfect example of how the adventure format and these global decisions can operate to enhance a campaign and even form a central element of the plot.

House Rules

In earlier parts of this series, we have made (and extended, and trimmed) a list of House Rules that would be required for the campaign; but with the exception of a few that were retained from earlier campaigns, these haven’t actually been written yet. One of these days I’ll do a more substantial article on the subject of creating House Rules*, but for now I’ll simply hit the high points:

  • Model your house rules on an existing example from within the game system as a first preference, and on an existing sample from a different game system that you know well as a second preference. Something completely original should be a distant third choice, made only when the first two don’t yield a model for you to follow.
  • Each and every House Rule needs to be justified, and that justification needs to be clear on what the rule is intended to achieve.
  • Every House Rule should have notes on a simpler, more abstract alternative in case it doesn’t work as envisaged. (NB: This is a case of “do as I say and not as I do” – failure in this area is one of weaknesses as a GM.
  • Rigorously apply the principles enunciated in one of my earlier articles, The Application Of Time and Motion to RPG Game Mechanics. In particular, if it is going to slow play, the justification for the rule had better be pretty darned good – and possibly even compensated by a simplification to another rules element that is at least as ubiquitous as the rule that slows play.
  • Test the rule to make sure it achieves the objective you’ve set for it.
  • Write a summary that explains the principles behind the rule as though you were explaining them to someone in an email. Maximum of three sentences permitted. This then becomes the introductory/explanatory text to the House Rule.
  • Look for hidden assumptions that might come back to bite you. Look HARD.
  • Go through your campaign plan. Make sure that there is at least one adventure relatively early in that plan in which you expect this House Rule to be showcased. Add to the prep requirements list for the adventure that follows, it a review of the House Rule.
  • Push the House rule to see what happens. So many rules are fine at low stat or character levels but fall apart under heightened stress.
  • Find an online list of feats, abilities, powers, whatever, for your game system. Search it for key terms from your House Rule, looking for unexpected confluences and interactions. Modify the House Rule accordingly.
  • This is an optional step, but one that I strongly recommend: give the House Rule to someone who knows the game system (who might not be a player in your game) and get them to review it for clarity and unexpected applications/flaws. Offer to return the favor if they ever want to call in the debt – and mean it. And accept their comments without a chip on your shoulder!

* One of the major reasons I haven’t done so is the degree of systems dependence that such an article would have and the difficulty of abstracting general solutions as a result. My fear is that it would either be so generic as to be useless or so system-specific that it would be useless to anyone else. As a result, it’s been on my back-burner for years, waiting for an approach to be uncovered that holds some hope of avoiding both these problems.


Your notes should contain everything that a player needs to generate a PC, including making intelligent choices for their prospective character. And they should be organized in logical fashion so that you (and they) can find whatever they are looking for. Creating an index is painstaking and tedious but often worth it.

Right now, neither of these is completely true. Before your campaign is ready to play, you need to change that.

Structural Organization

The organizational structure that I have been using as my guide throughout has been one that’s applicable to D&D (any flavor) simply because it covers all the bases; other game systems may not require everything on the list.

When a player indicates a desire to join the campaign, especially if the campaign is not already ongoing, here’s what they should receive:

  • A summary of the races available for PCs, as they are to be depicted within the campaign. This contains only what “everyone knows” and as such will be incomplete, abbreviated, and possibly even inaccurate.
  • An introduction to the game world and its history, society, geography, etc.
  • A summary – one paragraph at most – of each of the nations from which PCs may derive.
  • A summary of the archetypes or character classes available for PCs, as they are to be depicted within the campaign. This contains only what “everyone knows” and as such will be incomplete, abbreviated, and possibly even inaccurate.
  • The House Rules.

Once the prospective player has shortlisted one, two, or at most, three combinations of race, homeland, and archetype, they should receive the “full” (detailed) files on the chosen races, homelands, and archetypes that contains everything they need to know. In some campaigns and circumstances, they may instead receive an intermediate file that doesn’t reveal a race’s secrets, only getting “the whole story” once they have committed to a particular combination.

Even then, these files should not contain information that the race or archetype doesn’t know, though it may indicate areas of mystery that remain unresolved.

Internal Organization

I can’t speak for everyone, but I find it a lot easier to organize the contents of each document when everything is still in note form, simply because I can see more of the content at the same time. I use a lot of cut and paste to rearrange these notes into a coherent form.

Another trick is to use standardized headings for each file on a particular subject. This helps ensure that nothing has been left out, and generally imposes a level of rationality to the contents’ structure.

Expounding on the notes

Fortunately, even though this is a lot of work, much of it is complete already; you simply need to turn your notes into prose (one file for each nation, race, and archetype) and then edit and prune to get the versions for more general dissemination. Only a few of them should take a full hour to complete, and a reasonable average to aim at is 20 minutes or less.

Now, I know from experience that it takes a lot longer than that to properly create a balanced character class with descriptions of the class abilities. It follows that any such will be outside the boundaries of these estimates, which assume that you are simply modifying an existing class.

Cross-linking to House Rules

As I go, I am careful to cross-link to any House Rules of relevance. If there’s a house rule about extremely high Dexterity, for example, or if the GM has chosen to subdivide the stat into Nimbleness and Manual Dexterity (as I did for my first AD&D campaign), and a race gets a bonus to one or the other but not both, link to the relevant rule rather than repeating it redundantly.

Read-through, spell-check, edit, revise, polish

This should be fairly obvious! This is your final chance to make sure that your prose makes sense – take advantage of it!

Briefings & Backgrounds

Once characters have been generated, the clock to campaign start is definitely ticking. Without play, interest can only be sustained for a limited period of time. It is therefore important to make sure that you have all your ducks in a row before pulling that trigger.

I frequently buy additional time by getting players to generate a character background (which I then vet for compatibility within the game world). As much as possible, I like to make this an interactive process between the player and myself, enabling me to build connections to key plots into the characters, with the player’s approval, in advance. At the same time, I modify the campaign plan to integrate the actual characters – and the personal goals set for them by their creators – into what I have planned.

This frequently involves the preparation of additional briefing material for the player to read and integrate into their background. While it isn’t necessary to complete this material in advance, I do as much as I can find time for, because it eases time pressures later, freeing me up to focus on the individual adventures.

Exit Strategies

A player can choose to leave a campaign at any time. A character can die in any battle. The only certainty is that someone will want to do so at some point. Plan for it in advance!

Such planning consists of two parts: one, if the character doesn’t die, explaining where the character goes when he leaves, and why. Depending on the circumstances, this can be quite tricky – if an Elven character pulls out of the campaign in the middle of a life-or-death quest to save the Elvish Nation, for example. It might be that you need to keep the character around as an NPC until a certain point is reached – but this only defers the problem. Solve it now, and it’s out of the way.

The other aspect involved is to examine future plots for impact as a result of the character being missing. These may need modification.

This is one of the penalties involved in customizing the campaign to integrate the PCs. It’s a price well worth paying, but a little prep – like having a series of exit strategies for each PC that you can pull out of your back pocket whenever you need them – a lot of the angst which normally result can be expiated in advance.

These exit strategies all need to be generated in the context of what’s supposed to be going on in the campaign at the time. That’s why you may need several different ones for each character. Strategy #1 might apply until the fourth adventure, Strategy #2 might apply from adventure number 5 through 12, and so on.

Note that this isn’t the same as a temporary absence, no matter how prolonged it might be. However, it is the same as a player deciding that he isn’t enjoying his current character and wants to trade it in for a new PC.

Initial Adventure

There are also a couple of final decisions to be made in conjunction with the initial adventure. One of the necessities, for example, is to get all the PCs into the same physical location and give them a reason to bond into a group. Only when the characters have been generated do I know where they will be coming from, and therefore where the most sensible place for them to come together is going to be.

I then need to get the group from that point of assembly to wherever the first adventure is supposed to take place. Along the way, I like to incorporate mini-encounters that will introduce each PC to the group in a more substantial manner than a verbal “I’m Alderac, a Wizard from the Western Divide” does.


Finally, I make sure that any necessary infrastructure is in place. This could be anything from photos that give a sense of the world, its architecture, etc, to forms, paperwork, props, and tools. I include the selection of an appropriate miniatures figure for in-game use in this category, but it can also involve making sure that you have enough chairs for everyone who is going to be involved!

There often isn’t much in this category, but that just makes it a quick and easy box to tick – just what you want, approaching the end of a major task!

Oh, and one more thing: I make sure that I have contact information for everyone, and that everyone knows when and where play is expected to commence! This is taken for granted too frequently.

It’s been a long road, but the conclusion is in sight. We’ve taken a bunch of isolated ideas and legacies and forged them into a plan for a campaign, we’ve created everything that we need for PCs, and we’ve signed up a number of prospective players, who are busy reading briefing and background material and creating PCs. It’s time to put that plan into operation…

Comments (1)

Anatomy Of An Interruption – Endpoints


Having established in part one of this series that a pause or interruption to play or to the primary plot being deployed within the game can be more than a necessary inconvenience, it can be a tool whose manipulation by a savvy GM or TV producer can enhance the game or production, it’s time to take a closer look at the anatomy of an interruption.

End, Middle, and Beginning

While studying various television shows as research for this article – all right, paying attention to the breaks and surrounding content while watching – I determined that all the different types of activity pre-interruption could be abstracted into four simple categories, and that the same four categories also described (in the abstract) all the types of activity that followed an interruption.

Having identified those four types of pre- and post- break material, I began to notice that even in the course of presenting content, television programs often interrupt their own content in various ways, to heighten drama, provide narrative counterpoints, infuse irony, or enhance the entertainment value of the primary plot sequence. These were identifiable by the fact that after the interruption, the scene that had been taking place prior to the interruption would continue, though often at a different intensity or with added relevance or emotional context by virtue of the interruption.

By now, I was certain that the observations that I was making were relevant to RPGs, and would form the basis of an interesting article (or series, as it worked out) here at Campaign Mastery. When I began to actually contemplate the application, however, I discovered still more forms that a pause or interruption in play could take, and that some of these were actually almost inevitably built into the mechanics of many of the most popular games simply because that was the most practical time for them to occur.

By the time I was finished, I had 9 types of pause, break, or interruption. Each has it’s own utility from a plot/metagame perspective beyond any intrinsic purpose that it might hold, and each can be manipulated to the benefit of the game, particularly by combining two or more together. But that’s getting a little ahead of myself; Part three four of this series will deal with practical application, though I’m sure a few bits and pieces will manifest as we proceed.

Today’s article defines these elements of a break – the end of the content prior to the break, the beginning of the content that follows the break, and the different types of interruption that can go in-between: End, Middle, and Beginning.

Refining The Concept 1: Pre-pause peaks

Before any sort of pause, the content needs to reach a peak in intensity relative to the starting point of the scene that is being interrupted. Such peaks can be a call to action, a call to interaction, or a call to reflection.

(a) Peaks That Prompt Action

Decisions made that are about to be implemented, confrontations that are about to resolve into combat, or the identification of a need to perform some other sort of action, all are peaks that prompt action. Someone is about to do something.

But before they can begin doing so, there is an interruption or break, which serves to heighten the anticipation of the event that is about to take place.

Such breaks posses two essential attributes that need to be noted:

  • Anticipation can become frustration if the significance of the action does not exceed the negative value of the pause duration.
  • Re-entry into the scene post-break is more readily achieved because of the simple 1:1 relationship between the need to act in a certain way and actually acting in that manner.
  • Emotional intensity is easily lost following a pause if the rejoin takes place at the moment of result rather than the moment of action.

Let me explain each of these a little more substantially:


There are two forces that act during a pause or interruption: an upward trend in intensity caused by anticipation, and a tendency for that anticipation to turn into frustration. The greater the initial impetus caused by the pre-break situation, the longer it takes for the second effect to overcome the first. If you were to plot the emotional demand for resolution, ie the intensity, over time, the intensity is analogous to the altitude of a projectile, the first force to the vertical component of the initial kinetic energy of the projectile and the second to the force of gravity acting on the object.

Successful re-entry into the scene is the equivalent of the projectile reaching it’s target at the initial intensity or higher; once it’s downward velocity exceeds the initial input, frustration dominates, and the interruption will have a negative effect on game-play entertainment value.

The more initial impetus there is, the longer the break can be before negative effects overcome the positive ones. Note that once the “projectile” has been launched, you have little-or-no control over it; the point at which intensity maximizes is more or less fixed.

The more-or-less in that last statement exists because there are some forms of break activity that can act as equipping the “projectile” with a rocket engine: adding relevance in some manner, or players spontaneously speculating on the significance or outcome, for example – in other words, if the break is of a nature that it adds relevance, importance, or drama to the scene that has been interrupted.

Crucially, if the initial impetus is strong enough, one mechanism by which players can relieve early frustration is by venting it through such speculation; this, of course, can only occur if they interact socially during the break. If the group breaks up and goes in different directions, or if the nature of the interruption does not permit such interaction, this effect can’t be used. If the action is of a minor nature, the outcome will not be significant enough or interesting enough to prompt such speculation.

Consequently, the ability to manipulate the entertainment value of such scenes depends on achieving the correct combination of pre-break action and break-type.


Character A decides to do something – at which point, instead of resolving the action, there is an interruption of some sort. When the scene resumes, it is natural to restart it with the character putting that decision into action.

So strong is this relationship that any other sort of reentry into the scene is problematic, and likely to have a negative impact on the entertainment value of play overall. Even if there is to be an immediate transition to some other form of post-break content, it will “play” more smoothly if you permit the character to at least start doing whatever they had decided to do.


It is often considered expedient, especially if available time is running short, to return to the initial scene at the moment that the action produces results, rather than playing through the process of achieving those results. While better than transitioning to some other form of content during the scene continuation by virtue of the decision-action connection described above, the gameplay is never as satisfying to anyone because the action itself is not present to be viscerally satisfying.

This is always a compromise, valuing expediency above satisfaction; being aware of this can enable a more reasoned decision by the GM as to the utility of this compromise.

However, where an action will require considerable game time, a further compromise is possible: the GM can return to the action after the action has commenced but prior to an outcome being achieved. He can then acknowledge the time and events that have occurred “off-camera”, abbreviating the total process but still establishing and utilizing the decision-action connection. Like all successful compromises, the utility of this approach falls somewhere in-between the two alternatives. So this is a better choice than cutting directly to the outcome, while still reducing the time requirement to less than would have been required to play through the entire action.

The more high-paced the scene in question, the more acceptable this dramatic shortcut becomes, making this a useful technique in its own right – one that requires a pause or interruption to the scene in order for it to be useful!

(b) Peaks That Prompt Strong Interaction

Interaction is conversation between a PC and another character, either a second PC or an NPC. Strong interactions are heated, or otherwise possessed of emotional intensity. A character might propose marriage, for example – provided that this doesn’t come completely out of the blue, so that it has some emotional foundation, this would qualify as a strong interaction.

Strong interactions are wonderful in that they can successfully lead to any sort of post-break content within the scene. Take an accusation of betrayal, for example: post-break, this can lead directly to action (a physical response to the accusation), to a continuation of the strong interaction (melodrama), to a weak interaction (non-aggressive emotional response), or to Introspection/Analysis. No other type of pre-break content is as universal. That’s why a break is naturally-tolerated after a melodramatic pronouncement, regardless of the content of the overall production/adventure.

The only time post-break scenes fall flat following such strong interaction is when the subsequent scene does not contain acknowledgement of the strong interaction of some sort. Pretending it didn’t happen might be an occasional human reaction to such a scene, and can be quite satisfactory – but not if there’s a break in between!

But this type of lead-in to a break is even more flexible than it already seems; it’s perfectly justifiable for the content to be of a completely different nature provided that it is going to prompt a strong interaction after the break. Discovering evidence of an infidelity, for example, can precede a break – provided that the next time the action returns to the character making the discovery, they engage in a strong interaction of some sort, i.e. display some sort of intense emotional response to the discovery. This can be anything from having it out with the character in question to discussing the matter with a third party to plotting some sort of revenge, or even a strong denial of the evidence.

(c) Peaks That Prompt Weak Interaction

In contrast, these make the very worst sort of content for preceding a break. They have virtually no intensity, by definition, and next to no momentum to sustain interest through the break. The consequent tendency is to “overact” outrageously when returning to the scene, trying to make it seem more significant and intense than it should be, in order to get some emotional investment in proceedings on the part of someone.

It’s so strongly tempting to say never to use one of these – but that’s too simple an answer. Under the right circumstances, a weak-interaction scene going into a pause can work extremely effectively – can even be absolutely brilliant.

The secret is to engage the players (or the audience/readers) in a way that you aren’t engaging the characters.

EG: The primary character (PC) in a scene is a two-ton gargoyle who is trying to behave in a “civilized” fashion while remaining incognito. The secondary character (PC or more probably NPC) is a normal person who has become upset over something in a previous scene. PC: “I’m told that a hot cup of tea can be very soothing. Would you like me to make you one?” Reply: “That would be wonderful, but we’re out of milk.” PC: “I’ll just go down to the corner store and get some, be right back…”

Okay, this example scene played better in my head when I first thought of it. That’s not the point; it still works as an example. The incongruity of a two-ton gargoyle trying to be inconspicuous signals clearly that a comedic passage of play is to follow; such a passage would also qualify as a low=intensity scene, but because it is engaging the players on an entirely different, meta-game, level, this will work. Despite being low-intensity from the character’s point of view, it nevertheless makes a promise of strong interaction between the GM and the players after the break – and so, it works as any other high-intensity scene would.

(d) Peaks That Prompt Introspection/Analysis

The final category of content to be considered is revelatory in nature. I discussed these in some detail in part one, so I won’t go into too much detail here. Suffice it to say that the revelation needs to be of a nature that it creates buzz, and the more unexpected it is, the more buzz it will create amongst the players as well as amongst the characters.

This sort of scene works as lead-in to a break when the competence and ability to cope with surprise of the characters is greater than that of the players, because it lets the players vent some of their surprise, or come to terms with the revelation, before play resumes. This enables them to decide just how surprised their characters should be, rather than forcing the characters to mirror the reaction of the players.

The scene itself can be of any type; the fact of its ending in a revelation is sufficient to override that nature, though it may remain a secondary characteristic of the content, favoring the use of one type of post-break content over another. A disguise or truth can be exposed in combat; a discovery can be made as a result of actions undertaken; a secret can be blurted out in a heated exchange, or revealed in a whisper; or can be uncovered through the application of painstaking detective work.

It’s also important to realize that once you challenge the players to reevaluate a situation, you cannot stop them doing so at a player level and that the results will filter through into their character’s handling of the situation, whatever it may be. The introspection/analysis will start immediately – internally, if not aloud.

Finally, a truism that must be factored in: whenever you have a break that follows a revelation, it is dramatically almost mandatory that the scene that follows relates to that revelation. Exceptions can be crafted by skilled writers, but these are so rarely successful that they would hardly bear mentioning, if it weren’t for the one thing that these exceptions have in common: a break in between. In this case, one form of discontinuity (the break) can neutralize another (the content) provided that the break is substantial enough in nature to signal the beginning of a new chapter of the plot. This works because we expect a discontinuity in between chapters of a story. A very useful technique….

Refining The Concept 2: Post-pause activity

As you can see by the preceding, the attributes of all three elements of the interruption must operate in harmony in order to achieve an optimum outcome from the break. As a general rule, you have full control over two of the three, with the exigencies of current play, plot, or the reasons why a break is mandated, dictating the third. However, also as intimated, it is sometimes possible to gain some measure of control over the third element; the technique for doing so depends on the element to be controlled.

Where the initial action is defined by what the players are doing, or what their PCs are doing in-game, which is the most frequent circumstance, you can gain control over this by deliberately inserting a scene of optimum type to precede the break and tie in with the content to follow. This is the optimum solution when a break of some sort is necessary, but you have control over the timing, and avoids the problems of breaking at the wrong time.

Where the break is being forced on you, it usually means that don’t have that option – whatever was happening has to be suspended for some real-world reason, which will also dictate the length and nature of the break. However, rather than simply restarting where you left off, you can deliberately re-start with a compatible scene that (at least partially) regenerates the tension, intensity, and mood that existed before the break, enabling a smooth resumption of play. Furthermore, you can compound one type of break with another, further manipulating the tone of the game in a positive way in terms of its entertainment value.

The final circumstance is where the tonal character of the scene that will occur post-break is known and can’t be changed. This generally occurs because the pre-break scene has already been played and the anticipation/frustration combination is already at work; you can’t insert a new back-from-the-break-scene because you need to pay off that anticipation before the game’s entertainment value falls off a cliff. This might seem as though it locks you into one course of action, but in reality it simply demands that you be a little more creative in applying the principles that this series outlines. You could, for example, compound the existing and mandated break with one that gives a “lift” to the action/intensity by increasing the significance or danger level of the scene that’s already underway. This then allows a third type of break to be inserted before the intensity curve levels off and begins to plummet into frustration which completes the connection between pre-break and post-break intensity and content.

That means that it’s essential to understand the different types of content from both ends of the break, as well as the characteristics of the interval in between. Having looked at the pre-break content, and the post-break content that most successfully connects with it, we now have to look at the other end of the plot element: the post-break content.

(e) Post-Pause Action

While it’s theoretically possible for any type of pre-break content to lead to a post-break action sequence, there is a definite hierarchy of content in terms of the general success of the overall game.

  • A pre-break peak that prompts post-pause action is a natural match, so long as you haven’t waited too long. If you have, it’s often better to “cushion the fall” with a lower-intensity post-break sequence before transitioning to the action sequence, and this is so much more effective if the lower-intensity sequence adds value to the action sequence.
  • A pre-break peak that prompts a post-break high-intensity interaction can work, but can feel awkward and forced if player emotions have had time to cool during the break – so this combination suffers from exactly the same problems, in a way, as the call-to-action frustration issue. The same solution also applies; so your choices are to transition via the break from a high-intensity interaction either to action or to a low-intensity interaction that enhances an action sequence that follows it. This is one circumstance in which you can also achieve success by targeting the players in a different way to their characters; that’s because the problem isn’t that the PCs have cooled off, it’s that the players have, and hence will no longer bring the same intensity of motivation to their play. Doing something to fire up the players again therefore solves the problem.
  • A pre-break revelation that prompts a post-break action sequence is almost as natural as going from a moment of high melodrama into an action sequence, but the nature of the revelation must support a transition to action. Quite often, a revelation doesn’t create a clear course of action in response; it is more about providing context to events that have already occurred, and inducing a threat within current or future events that cannot be combated until those events transpire. It is often more effective to segue post-break into a period of weak interaction or even further reflection/contemplation/introspection/analysis; but that can leave the game dragging and limp after a while, so it is best to only permit so much of that before inserting a sequence of mindless and unimportant action, which has the sole purpose of lifting the energy levels and pace of the game. Both roads ultimately lead to an action sequence, in other words, but some (perhaps most) revelatory content mandates getting there the long way around.
  • Worst of all is transitioning from a low-energy or weak interaction – a quiet chat between allies, or neighbors, for example – straight into an action sequence. No matter how relevant the action sequence is to the overall plot, it always feels tacked on. The solution to this problem is to redefine the scope of “action sequence” to include low-intensity actions. If your low-intensity interaction leads to a character intending to go shopping, play the shopping expedition. Then transition from the low-intensity action to a call to medium-intensity action – while the character is shopping, someone attempts to rob the store. It is then easy to transition from the medium-intensity action to full-on action – the robbery has been thwarted, the store is surrounded by Police, and the news helicopter overhead is making live reports – which lead the antagonists of the real action sequence to the PC. Alternatively, you can simply have a medium-intensity melodramatic statement – a low-key threat when the PC is discovered in a tense situation, leaving the door open for a quick-witted quip on the part of the PC and then into the action sequence! (James Bond movies have been using this trick of a rapid-escalation for decades (especially leading into the pre-title action sequence), as have the writers of Spider-man). Either way, the technique is to elevate the intensity to a medium-level in one step and thence to further elevate it into the action sequence, rather than trying to complete the jump in one step.
(f) Post-Pause Strong Interaction

I described strong interactions as the most universal of the content types when used as the closing moment of a pre-break sequence. It is almost as universal in the post-break position.

  • Going from an action sequence to a Strong Interaction works – unless there’s a break in between. Even if the game system calls for a post-action-sequence break, you are better off deferring it until after the ensuing strong interaction. I’ll talk some more on this subject in a little while, because the nature of the break shines light on how to handle this. For now, suffice it to say that the post-action break should be deferred until after the strong interaction, even if that interaction is likely to lead to a further action sequence.
  • Going from one strong interaction sequence to another can be really problematic, because there’s no contrast. Only if the tone of the two interactions is completely opposite would I contemplate it – one couple declaring their love for each other while another scream verbal abuse into the wind in a heated argument, for example, has enough contrast to make it work. Indeed, you could argue that the contrast heightens the significance of both sequences.

    Under any other circumstance I would deliberately separate the two with a low-intensity interaction or an introspective moment. Since these don’t work very well pre-break except under very restricted circumstances, the better choice most of the time is to position the low-intensity interaction post-break. However, that means that the atmosphere generated by the high-intensity interaction will persist through the course of the break, which is only acceptable if the tone was positive in some way. The lesser of two evils is often to insert low-intensity interactions on both sides of the break, even though that can be problematic in itself; tying one of the two into one of the high-intensity interactions can lift it just enough to make the transition palatable. A brief interlude in which a third character asks one of the participants in the first high-intensity exchange, “Are you OK? I can’t believe the nerve of that [fill-in-the-appropriate-term]…”, for example.

  • Going from a low-intensity interaction to a stronger interaction can happen naturally if it builds on an existing trend or undercurrent in the low-intensity interaction, and involves the same characters. Under any other circumstance, the best approach is to insert a scene or pre-scene sequence after the break which lifts the intensity to a medium level; the simplest such is to recap – in the most biased and prejudicial way possible – the reasons that the high-intensity interaction is about to take place. The bias to employ is the one that best leads to the high-intensity interaction, so it has to match in tonal value.
  • Finally, going from a period of introspection or analysis that has led to a revelation, to a high-intensity interaction, works perfectly IF the subject of the interaction is the revelation and vice-versa. Yes, this is highly melodramatic – but so long as you accept that, there’s no problem (I have a lengthy example to offer, but don’t think it’s warranted). Instead, let me turn my attention to the alternative situation – where the subject of the interaction bears no relation to the revelation. There is only one way that I know of to make this succeed, in terms of the broader narrative and overall entertainment value, and that is to employ a break that possesses attributes associated with the “end of a chapter”, as described earlier. It follows that if the break is not of that nature, you need to compound it with a break that is.
(g) Post-Pause Weak Interaction

It’s always a problem transitioning to a weak interaction after a break. There are occasions when this transition is natural, however, and not to be obstructed.

Going from any sort of high-intensity situation to a low-intensity situation only works under very limited circumstances: either the low-intensity situation must relate in subject to the preceding high-intensity situation, in which case it is effectively a winding-down of the characters involved; or the weak interaction must connect in subject to a future high-intensity situation and precede the break.

An example of the first: after the big fight, letting the victorious participants interact with each other is very natural and normal. Give the PCs time to celebrate before moving on and they will enjoy the game far more than they would otherwise – while never realizing that it is this release that boosts the entertainment value so highly. Note that it can be argued that this scene is even more effective if the break is delayed until after it takes place – even if that means inserting another low-intensity scene post-break!

An example of the second: after the big fight, the GM cuts to a scene that the PCs cannot possibly observe, showing a villain (unnamed) watching the PCs deal with the high-intensity situation, and talking ominously to himself in a manner that signifies an eventual threat to the PCs. This sort of scene is natural in comics, and occasionally shows up in movies and television as a teaser for future developments – Thanos’ appearances in various Marvel movies being a great example. This works in an RPG because it speaks directly to the players, while passing completely unnoticed by their characters; in media parlance, it breaks the fourth wall to promise “even more interesting events” in the future lives of the PCs.

The value of this type of scene can be maximized if it falls somewhere close to, but prior to, a chapter-ending break. A perfect example is showing that Darth Vader survived the final attack on the Death Star in the original Star Wars movie; this is THE scene that promises a sequel, because it shows that the threat has only been abated, not ended.

Despite the problems that go along with the proposition, going from one low-intensity scene pre-break to another, post-break, is often the most natural transition. As noted previously, the major difficulties are with the turgid, even soporific, pacing that results. If you can spice things up before and/or after such scenes with a more dynamic sequence, this can be anywhere from tolerable to brilliant. I’ve already discussed using this form of transition as a bridge between other content types, so there isn’t a lot more to add here.

(h) Post-Pause Introspection/Analysis

This works so poorly that I can’t think of a single instance of it being successfully employed. When the premiere of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine was shown on Australian Free-to-air (commercial) TV, they cut to an ad break just before Cisko found himself speaking to the “wormhole aliens”. While this emphasized the discontinuity with normality that he experienced at their hands, it also meant that it had all the impact of a wet noodle – especially when they did the same trick of timing again, and again, and again.

There is only one solution that works, and that is by harnessing the power of melodrama (ie a moment of high-intensity interaction) – a dramatic revelation can be followed by a break and lead into a post-interval period of analysis or introspection. The usual rules of a revelation apply – it is pretty much mandatory that the subsequent scene be all about the revelation.

In our previous episode…

There is one special case that deserves closer attention: the presentation of a synopsis at the start or re-start of play. Technically, this qualifies as a post-break introspection/analysis scene. However, it works for one particular reason: the synopsis aims to recapture the situation prior to the break after summarizing the path that led to that situation; and the post-synopsis scene should pick up after the events described. This need not be immediately afterwards, in game time; minutes, hours, even days, can have passed in between, provided that the situation at the end of the previous play session did not demand instant action, and did not mandate decisions on the part of the players. The synopsis becomes something of a break-content hybrid, a bridge between game sessions. Note that the revelation rule still applies: if the previous session ended with a revelation, the first scene after the break should be about the revelation, even if it’s a low-intensity conversation between the characters about the revelation, or an introspective moment as a lone PC tries to gather further information relating to the revelation, or whatever.

When the PCs come up with a plan, there is sometimes no need to play through all the steps of preparation; instead, contemplating a hard-cut to the PCs beginning to put their plan into operation. That’s how Return Of The Jedi begins – with a plan to rescue Han from Jabba the Hut, a plan that begins with two Droids carrying a message from Luke to Jabba – and smuggling a weapon into his throne room in the process.

I’m completely out of time and haven’t even started on analyzing the nine types of break yet! Oh well, that will have to wait…

Comments (1)

New Beginnings: Phase 8: Enfleshing

new beginnings 09

Just as spring brings new sprouts and buds, so the Enfleshing process sprouts the final structural elements of a new Campaign.

It’s not easy making a completely fresh start. This series examines the systematic process of creating a new campaign in detail, from start to finish. The contents (updated with each post) can be found in “part zero” of the series.

Bone, Cartilage, and Flesh: A metaphor

Everything that’s been done so far has been in the nature of generating ideas and content in note form and linking these together to create a structure. Nothing has been included without a good reason for it’s being there, and in many cases, content “boxes” have been created but not filled because those contents were not deemed critical to the campaign.

Before actual campaign construction (as opposed to design) can begin, those empty boxes need to be filled. In metaphoric terms, “flesh” has to be put on that “skeleton”. But even before we can do that, there are a few more boxes to add in order to be sure we’ve got everything covered. These aren’t skeleton, essential to the structure of the campaign, but they are essential to connecting everything together and defining the final shape of the flesh to be added.

The goal is be able to simply unfold the content in its final form and wrap it around all the underlying structure like a blanket; there should be no deep thinking involved, no need to pause or delay at all, it should simply flow. To reach that point, these remaining boxes need to be put in place, and where necessary, linked to ideas. If the flesh is muscle, and the work that remains to be described in today’s article is something in between muscle and skeleton, the closest analogy would be cartilage.

There are five different categories under this one general heading: Archetypes, Races, Adversaries, Key NPCs, and Locations. In most of these subjects, a lot of work has already been done – the task for today is turning the decisions that were made into adventures, encounters, and situations that reveal the substance of the game world. It is always better if the fundamental content makes itself apparent by being significant to a situation rather than seeming tacked on afterwards.

A Tale for each Archetype

When it comes to archetypes, we’ve gone to some trouble to identify one or more aspects of the base concepts that are unique and distinctive to this game world, and – where necessary – we’ve revised them in whole or in part to ensure that they are compatible with the concepts on which the world has been based. We’ve also tried to link them in some way to the campaign themes and various other fundamental principles of the planned campaign.

Wouldn’t it be a shame if all that went to waste?

The PC Assumption

A lot of the work has been done on the basic assumption that each archetype might be chosen as the basis of a PC. Where this proves to be a correct assumption, an adventure built around that archetype becomes a starring role for the PC – either in the role of the character around whom the adventure is based, or can present a situation in which a professional colleague of the PC is central, giving the PC a different chance to shine. The latter presents greater control over the situation for the GM because it doesn’t require the PC to behave in a predictable manner – that can be left to an NPC under the GM’s control. However, it can also be assumed that such an adventure is less necessary when a player is putting the archetype on display on a routine basis.

Where no player chooses to build a PC on that archetype, the only way they – and the aspects of the game world that they embody – will get featured is where an plot is built around an NPC to deliberately display the archetype.

Archetype Tales

The notion, then, is to craft an adventure for each archetype that highlights one or more of the unique aspects or interpretations of the archetype or that has the archetype as central to that adventure. These should be standalone in nature so that if they aren’t out-of-the-ballpark ten-out-of-ten adventure ideas, and a PC is putting the archetype on display anyway, they can be dropped. They are important to the campaign but not an essential part of the structure.

However, it is even more useful when an existing adventure – one that is therefore central to the broader campaign plot – can be used as a vehicle for this information, because it integrates it even more closely, binding the archetype concepts to the campaign.

Archetype Tales 1: The Procedure

The first step, to be performed for each of the archetypes, is to review each of the adventures you already have outlined in the campaign structure, assessing each for its suitability for highlighting the archetype then under examination.

If there is no such adventure, the need is to specify a standalone adventure, and the most important decision to be made is where in the Campaign Plan the adventure can best be located. By definition, the metagame purpose of this adventure is to reveal additional elements of the game world to the players; so the decision is best made on the basis of the central importance of the information to be revealed. That often hinges on the way the information relates to other facts – if the adventure in question can be used to reveal something that will be a key factor in future player decisions, it should be presented early in the campaign; if it’s simply shining a light on some aspects of the world that might otherwise go unnoticed, you have more latitude.

This is where the work in Phase 7 (‘Skeleton’), connecting the archetypes to the Nexii, becomes invaluable, because this specifies exactly how that particular archetype can link to different parts of the campaign plan – early, middle, or late. Once you have decided where the most effective location within the campaign plan is going to be, it’s a simple matter to insert an adventure “slot”.

Once the relevant adventure has been positioned within the plan, the next step is to make note of exactly what the adventure is going to be about. For this, you may need to consult your ideas file; and, if nothing suitable is found there, go looking for ideas on the net or in relevant sourcebooks. I’ve made my opinions on list products clear in the past (Listing to one side: The problems of List Products), but this is one occasion when the right list can save your bacon – and that’s why Campaign Mastery presents such lists from time to time (most recently in the occasional “Casual Opportunities series.

What you want is a situation in which the distinctiveness of the archetype makes a difference in the situation, either creating it, complicating it, or holding the solution to it. That’s actually a rather broad remit, leaving plenty of scope for the choice of adventure to reflect themes.

A clarification: It isn’t necessary to have an adventure for every unique or modified aspect of an archetype. The presumption is that the other basic concepts will be displayed along with the aspect that has been selected for prominence; and that you will have made that selection after contemplating the significance of the different concepts embodied within the archetype. In other words, you’ve picked a difference that matters – because that’s the easiest thing to build an adventure around – and the rest can be assumed to come along for the ride. They will be noted if they are important enough, and can be ignored if not. It isn’t going to be necessary to explain everything; a lot of it can simply be taken as exemplified within this one example of the archetype.

This in turn means that other aspects of the archetype can be highlighted if and when it is used as the foundation for a relevant NPC. You are going to have a fair number of those, after all, and some of them will probably be representatives of this archetype!

Once the basic premise of the adventure has been filled in, it’s time to give it the same treatment that all the other adventure ideas received in the “Organization” stages of Phase 4, ‘Development’ – listing the unanswered questions of Where, Who, Antagonist, etc, and cross-referencing with other campaign elements as appropriate. And then you can move on to the next Archetype – subject to the Caveat below, of course.

Archetype Tales 2: Revising the Archetypes

There’s one major reason why all this is vital and must be done at this stage of campaign creation: it provides a final “reality check” on the ideas. Something can sound great in theory but be so hard to work with, or be so alien to the way your creative mind works, that it becomes untenable. This is your final chance to catch and reform such campaign-harming “bright ideas” – all those things that sounded good at the time…

If you can’t build an adventure featuring an archetype that displays how that archetype fits into the game world or is unique or simply distinctive, it’s a sure bet that the archetype won’t work as a PC, either. Now is the time to revise it if necessary.

A Tale for each key Race

Having gone into the process in detail for Archetypes, there isn’t all that much more that needs to be said regarding the second of the subjects – races. Each of the major races needs an adventure in which they, and especially anything distinctive or unusual that you’ve added or changed, can feature. If you can make this an adventure that’s already in the campaign plan, so much the better; if not, you need to add one.

However, speaking from experience, every PC emphasizes different aspects of the Race from which they derive; it is by no means certain that having a player choose a race will highlight what you consider to be the important differences. Sometimes the player simply can’t get his head around the ideas that you’ve incorporated – it happens. Unlike the archetype, then, you can’t rely a race being represented by a PC to communicate the uniqueness of that race – and that leaves it up to you.

A Tale for each Significant Adversary

Having grown used to the basic process while dealing with the easy subjects, it’s time to get into something a bit more complicated: the Adversaries that you intend to feature within the campaign.

The first question that needs answering is a criterion for judging whether or not an adversary is “significant”. Each GM needs to find his own answer to this, taking into account the intended length and scale of the campaign. In some cases, it might be that every adversary who features in an adventure is considered significant, in others, the accolade may be reserved for those adversaries who have a role to play in multiple adventures. In still others, foes might be divided into two categories – “mundane” and “supernatural”, or “common” and “political” – with only one of these being deemed “Significant”.

Personally, I usually lean toward the “multi-adventure” profile, plus any who have a significant part to play in altering the direction of the campaign (even if they only make a single appearance). But I have used all of the working definitions offered as examples, and more besides.

For each Significant Adversary, there are nine, or perhaps, ten “boxes” that need to be ticked, ie to have content allocated.

Adversary Tales 1: Introductions, Please

Before a significant adversary makes his first appearance, it’s usually necessary to lay some groundwork. This can be an adventure in itself, or an encounter, or simply a background element to another encounter.

What do I mean by “groundwork”? Here are three examples:

  1. The Beholder: If I’m going to use a Beholder as an Antagonist in a D&D or Pathfinder adventure, I will want an encounter or scene that establishes that Beholders exist and that they are very bad news. I don’t need a living Beholder for this; a dead one, or a rumor of one, or a tapestry that features the defeat of one, or any of several alternatives will do. Basically, I want an excuse to tell the players anything that their characters know about Beholders (in case they don’t know it already), and just as importantly, to make sure to define what it is that their characters don’t know. I will also make sure to have at least one “fact” that is different from published canon, purely to warn the players that the details of the monster may have been changed, as a specific warning that encounters from other games (or having memorized the rulebooks) will be (at best) an unreliable guide to the strategy that they should adopt when encountering one. And since I don’t believe in idle threats, I will actually change something significant about them – like giving them a phasing ability that lets them pass through walls and material obstacles, and ignore (at least partially) any damage that occurs in a round after they have acted.
  2. The Last Dragon: If the adversary is intended to be the last Dragon to have survived into “modern” times, I will want to highlight the fact that the Dragons are all dead, and how they are believed to have died. Again, I’m looking for an excuse to give background information and misinformation to the Players before it becomes important. Including that information in the adventure in which the adversary is revealed is far too clumsy if presented after the revelation, and far too obvious if it precedes the revelation – and (at the moment of revelation), the players have more urgent things on their minds! The only solutions are to present the information when it no longer matters (which is rather pointless) or before it becomes important.
  3. The Crime Czar: Finally, let’s say that the antagonist is going to be a crime boss of some sort. Before the first Lieutenant shows his nose, the players should become aware that there is a significant level of crime and that the authorities are not getting very far in curbing it. This then gives the Lieutenant some context when he makes his initial appearance, and that in turn gives context and significance to the Adversary when he finally makes a direct appearance.

In a nutshell, then, this “box” is about how a significant adversary will be “introduced” into the PCs lives – and the player’s consciousness.

Adversary Tales 2: The Initial Confrontation

There are writers and directors who suggest that the initial confrontation between a hero (PCs) and villain (antagonist) is the most important scene they will share. The villain either makes an impression, or everything subsequent falls flat. In the case of a minor villain – i.e. one without Significance – that doesn’t matter too much; but for a Significant Adversary it’s close enough to be a serious consideration.

I’m a firm believer that while spontaneity is good, a little bit of prep goes a long way. At the very least, a note or two is warranted on how to ensure that the antagonist’s first entrance (or his unmasking, if he’s been hanging around in disguise for a while prior) is suitably dramatic and impressive.

Adversary Tales 3: Adversarial Destinies

Karma. A campaign may not have it as an overt theme, but it’s something that every GM should strive to bring about – at least in terms of the important Adversaries getting just what they deserve in the end. So what fate is befitting? What is appropriate? What will be viscerally satisfying to the players? They may or may not get to deliver the coup-de-grace; that depends on how successful they are. But the adversary should fail, and fall, eventually – their karmic destiny should be inevitable (if impossible to predict) even before the final confrontation begins. Again, this is not likely to happen by accident – so do at least some preliminary planning in advance.

Adversary Tales 4: Reaction to Setbacks

How the adversary reacts to setbacks is going to form a significant element of their in-game persona, all going well from the player’s point-of-view. It has to be consistent with the rest of the adversary’s personality, but in most cases it will involve a significant divergence from the way that personality has been expressed previously in the encounter.

Some will be hotly furious, lashing out with unthinking violence. Others may be coldly furious, making the architects of their reverses targets for some utterly ruthless action – while some will take it out on their underlings. Others may decide to try to bargain. A few may have trouble even recognizing that they’ve been thwarted, or may obsess over finding a way to achieve that goal at any cost. Some will simply rant and rave, while others may plunge into deep depression – for a while. A few might retreat into isolation to brood until coming up with a new and better plan – or simply an appropriate vengeance.

Make the decision, and ensure that this choice is consistent with the behavior of that adversary in subsequent encounters. It might be that the PCs don’t get to witness the reaction; but it should shape how the antagonist behaves, and at some future point, word may leak out and reach the PCs ears.

Adversary Tales 5: Reaction to Failure

The reaction to setbacks has only superficial resemblance to how the antagonist will react when their plans actually fail. The reactions will either be more extreme or less, but this will be no less critical – if only because it will usually get displayed in front of an appreciative PC audience! A great deal depends on the flexibility and confidence of the antagonist, as compared to the scale of the failure, and who he holds responsible. The best time to think about this is before you need to know it, so that when and if the time comes, you don’t have to think about it – just roleplay what you have already specified.

Adversary Tales 6: Master Plans

Every adversary needs a master plan of some sort. Even your combat monster has some sort of master plan – it’s just vague and built around the size of his biceps. The master plan bridges from what the adversary can do right now to what the adversary wants to achieve, at least in their own mind; it’s what they are doing now, and what they intend to do next. No master plan takes specific account of PC actions, at best there is an allowance for “obstructions” and a plan to deal with them if and when that becomes necessary.

Before I conclude this subsection, I should point readers to a quartet of my articles from a couple of years ago that are still popular:

Adversary Tales 7: Flaws

Every villain needs a flaw or two. A blind spot, or an obsession, or whatever. These can be justified in his mind as part of his personal style, but this is often lying to himself to justify something he would ditch in a heartbeat if he were as coldly ruthless at self-analysis as he is at everything else.

Take Ernst Stavro Blofeld from the James Bond franchise as an example. He has three notable flaws: His love of Turkish Angora cats; his fondness for grandiose plans; and his boastfulness when in a position of self-perceived dominance. Of these, the last and first are the most serious; the last because the self-perception is often flawed, and the first because no matter how much he changes his appearance and identity, the cats and the manner in which he handles them are an easy means of identification. No doubt he has resolved a dozen times not to boast too soon, not to count his eggs before they hatch; but he just can’t help himself, a weakness that he would never tolerate in a subordinate. And as for the cats….

Adversary Tales 8: Flaw Impacts

It’s one thing to have a flaw. To be truly useful to the GM, he should work out several ways in which that flaw might impact on the adversary’s activities. Flashes of hot anger? A subordinate might get scared and be willing to make a deal. Tends to get obsessed with removing obstacles? Hires an assassin to stalk the PCs. Punishes perceived personal slights or disrespect? Hatches a scheme to humiliate someone even at the risk of damaging his operation.

Why do this in advance?

If things always went to plan – your plan, not the adversary’s – it wouldn’t be necessary, you could interpret the flaws and their impact on in-game events in advance. Enter the PCs, who rarely follow the GM’s plan of action, and that will constantly force you to improvise the reactions and subsequent actions of the adversary in response. That, in turn, is a lot easier if you have at least some basics worked out in advance – and that’s what this box is all about.

Adversary Tales 9: The Ultimate Objective

It’s great having the villain’s immediate plans worked out, up to the point where you expect the PCs to stop those plans dead – but you should always have the ultimate objective spelt out. This gives you the adversary’s motivation, and offers a guideline to the changes he will make in his plans as opportunities open and close.

Until recently, I would not have included this; I would have felt it was enough to have The Master Plan, in fact I did. But, when my co-GM and I were working on the next Pulp Adventure, “Prison Of Jade”, something just wasn’t right. We knew what the villain was doing, we knew what he would achieve if not stopped, but in the “Why” column – the Ultimate Objective – we had a political goal in the “world domination” category, and it simply didn’t fit his modus operandi and the history and reputation that we had created for him; it was far too prosaic. Between us, we came up with two or three alternatives, and then blended two of those together (with a little research) to identify an alternative that ticked all the right boxes – and ultimately made the villain a far more interesting character. I can’t go into details now; that will have to wait until after the adventure gets played – but he became the villain he was reputed to be, and someone worthy of the insidious Master Plan we had already devised.

As soon as I realized that the problem with the villain as he was lay in a failure to identify an appropriate ultimate objective (as opposed to a merely realistic one), I realized that this box needed to be included in this checklist.

Adversary Tales 10: A Preliminary Encounter?

That’s quite a lot of information, and it’s all the things that the GM really needs to have sorted before play. But is there so much information that it’s worth contemplating a preliminary encounter with the antagonist that at least hints at some of this material, or establishes it? Again, this is a decision for each GM to make for themselves – but if one is needed, this is the time to insert it. So, for each antagonist, ask yourself the question – and follow it up with a second, before committing yourself: Would a preliminary encounter steal any element of surprise that you are counting on? If the answer to this second question is “no,” it doesn’t matter what your answer is to the first – a “yes,” to the first question simply indicates that the GM is going to have to work that much harder in constructing the currently-planned first encounter with the villain.

Again, the example that presents itself is Blofeld. It’s one thing for the PCs to get told about his cat fetish – it’s quite another for them to have already encountered a villain who exhibits that trait, without appreciating the significance at the time. But it means that the second time a villain with that habit is encountered, even if he doesn’t look anything like he did the first time around, the players should recognize the trademark!

A Tale for each key NPC

Every campaign contains a few NPCs of special significance. Allies at key moments, or guides and mentors, or simply people who seek to use the PCs to their own advantage (or who do so), for example. Authority figures who will work against the PCs best interests in pursuing circumstances that benefit themselves or their cause. Even something as simple as a recurring barman and his lovely daughter can qualify!

As with Adversaries, the first step is to decide just what you mean by the term “Key NPC” in the context of this particular campaign. Once you know that, work through your list of adventures (which may already have expanded as a result of the work on Archetypes, Races, and Adversaries that has been done already) and generate a list of NPCs that meet this criteria.

Once again, I have nine key things to be noted about each of these NPCs. This is not a full character-generation process; it’s simply getting preliminary designs down on paper. However, by defining these NPCs as “Key characters” within the campaign, you are also indicating that they are too important for blind character generation to be anything but a starting point; the NPC, as generated later, has to fit the definitions and characteristics that are defined within this section, and not the other way around.

NPC Tales 1: Plot Relevance

Why does this NPC matter? What is their relevance to the plot, their purpose? You’ve determined that they are going to be a Key character in the campaign – why? Everything else in the NPC’s design needs to be subordinated to this purpose as a primary requirement.

NPC Tales 2: Position & Place

What is their in-game position? Where? What is their social rank? Which social circles do they move in, and in which circles are they comfortable? And where, physically, is that job performed?

NPC Tales 3: Personality

What sort of personality should the NPC have in order to fulfill that purpose? You don’t need a full profile, but some highlights and keywords are important. Usefully, this also lets you make them individuals rather than cardboard cut-outs based on plot function; not all your advisors or mentors to the PCs should be wise and generally helpful! Some should be reluctant, or scheming, or…

Important Opinions

An related question that should be asked – what are the opinions that the character holds – especially any that are relevant to their plot purpose, general occupation, or are controversial either in real-world terms or in game-world terms. Again, just because an NPC is there to help the PCs doesn’t mean they have to be an altar boy!

NPC Tales 4: Agenda

What agenda, if any, are they pursuing? Everyone should have an agenda, though you might need to stretch the definition a little bit. Ideally, this will be a motivation that can cut both ways relative to the PCs. For example, a character’s agenda might be to live up to an idealized vision of the political state that he serves; that would make him reluctant to compromise his principles in the slightest, and hostile to those who try to point out flaws in his world-view. It might make him tend to react harshly to those who don’t share and support his idealized vision. While this character would probably be a useful ally and asset to the PCs, he could become an enemy and outspoken critic very easily – because he is pursuing his own agenda and isn’t merely a tool to facilitate what the PCs want to do.

NPC Tales 5: Introduction

What, if anything, should the PCs know about the character before they first meet him? What could they find out, if they bothered to do so? Does the character have a public reputation that they don’t deserve – or one that they do deserve? And is that reputation good or bad from the PCs point of view?

NPC Tales 6: The First Meeting

When and where will the PCs first meet the NPC? Is it more useful to have a separate encounter just to introduce the two to each other? Note that this doesn’t have to be a face-to-face encounter – the PCs could simply see the character doing his job, while the public reacts. This, and similar ideas, are great ways to get the “Introduction” material into the player’s hands before the NPC becomes plot-significant; but it always risks the players jumping the gun, which is why it’s important to have everything you need to run the character in place before such an in-game appearance.

NPC Tales 7: Reasons to care

A lesson from television production, this: the protagonists, and the audience, need a reason to care about what happens to the NPC. This doesn’t apply to every character, but it certainly applies to the important ones! The RPG analogues are the PCs, who need an in-game reason to care, and the players who need a metagame reason.

Note that caring doesn’t mean that the relationships have to be positive – villains that are hated satisfy the criterion just as handily! But you need some sort of emotional reaction, even if you have to entice it or induce it.

It can be something simple – I once used an unsavory NPC who kept a live feed of baby birds in their nest playing on his TV every time he was in his office, giving him the opportunity to take glee in “all the wrong things” – the way the worms wriggled as the birds were fed them, still living; the way the mothers pushed them out of the nest when the time was right; the way they constantly fought with each other for food and attention, which reminded him of his childhood… He had something to mention every time he appeared in-game, and the longer it persisted, the creepier it got, especially the way his eyes would light up when speaking of them. He was also an officious oaf who was there to help the PCs when they really needed it – but who made them jump through hoops before considering one of their requests. There were times when he was their greatest ally, a hidden ace-in-the-hole, and times when he was the biggest road-block they had to overcome, because he had leverage over just about everyone in the form of favors owed to him. But they definitely cared about him – the players and their characters hated having to go to him, because he made them uncomfortable, but both knew they needed him. There were definitely times when the PCs wanted to throttle him, and times when he was their closest ally! In his final scene, he revealed an absolute loyalty to the political administration who employed him, and that he sublimated and transferred his darker instincts into the birds’ nest images – and getting himself killed for his loyalty, putting the PCs into the awkward position of hunting down his killer while not being sure they weren’t glad he was dead! If they were uncaring, the adventure would have fallen flat, and been mechanical follow-the-numbers; instead, there was the sort of passionate ambivalence that only “real people” – or “realistic people” can engender.

Remember: not all allies need to be on the PCs side, not all friends are allies, and not all enemies have to be hated; but there needs to be a reason to care about them, or they won’t be valued.

NPC Tales 8: Intended Evolution

Over the course of his appearances within the game, how is the character intended to change? People don’t stay static, they evolve over time. A character can be viewed as having a central personality core, a layer of substance around it, and a layer of superficiality and circumstances around that; each of these changes at different rates. The outer layer is most quickly transformed, the layer of substance evolves only slowly, and generally in response to dramatic life events, and the innermost layer is most consistent – but it can be eroded and transformed by the accumulation of lesser changes, or altered dramatically by the most extreme of situations.

One of the key NPCs in the Zenith-3 campaign is a Kzin, one of their first superheros. The PCs saved his race from a civil war that would have ruined them for someone else’s benefit, and he feels a debt of honor that needs to be repaid; at the same time, he was raised to despise Humans for the humiliations that the race has inflicted on his people in the past. Over time, the debt will slowly be repaid; at the same time, he is getting to know the PCs “from the inside”, resolving the internal conflict into which his circumstances have placed him. Will he become an enemy? Will he overcome the childhood conditioning that drives him? Will he become his own worst enemy – as often happens when people are placed in such personal conflicts over a long period of time? The players – and the PCs – don’t know. Right now, he is a reluctant but absolutely loyal and reliable ally, and all they know for certain is that something in that statement will change eventually – and probably without notice!

NPC Tales 9: Deserved Destiny

When you add up the totality of who the NPC is, and what role he is intended to play within the campaign, what fate does the character deserve – and is there a way that you can see that he gets it by the end of the campaign?

Take the bird-lover described earlier: what be deserved was to have his virtues extolled and to become remembered as a loyal servant of the state. Before that could happen, the players had to work through their own ambivalence in order to avenge him; once they had done so, they were able to reform his public image in a fitting tribute and public memorial. “He gave his life in the service of the State, the State needs to repay that with appropriate commemoration at a State Funeral.”

A Tale for each key Location

Locations seem to get short shrift in many RPGs. They are viewed as nothing more than a disposable backdrop to the tactical problem of the hour, the NPC of the minute, the drama of the day. This neglects a useful source of color and vitality.

Of course, not every location deserves anything more. An inn can exist purely as a place for the players to sleep; a village purely as a place for such an inn to be located. Sometimes, a mountain is just an obstacle that needs to be crossed.

But there are some locations which serve as settings for considerable play or significant confrontations that will shape the campaign, and these key locations need greater substance and importance. If the players are likely to be in a position to explore, or to interact at length with the locals, or if an adventure is intended to take place there, the location needs to be brought to life.

There are 15 facts that should be noted about each such location. Most of them require nothing more than single-line answers, though a few may be a little more substantial. The order is important, to some extent, as you will see as we proceed:

Location Tales 1: History

We start with the History of the place – in one sentence if possible, one brief paragraph at most. This is not intended to be a complete record, instead it should be the sort of thumbnail history that you might read in a guidebook or travel brochure, or that someone might offer in passing in a hotel or inn.

Note that it’s impossible to generate these location histories without at least some notion of the broader history of the game world, which is why this has had to wait until now.

Four examples:

  • “Built twenty-five years ago to study deep space, when the economy crashed in 2025 the space station was bought by Richard Branson and now serves as an exotic resort for his Virgin Galactic tours.”
  • “Was once a thriving, growing metropolis, but never really recovered after being razed during the Goblin invasion 40 years ago.”
  • “Began as a customs and immigration office to prevent the destitute survivors of the Civil War in nearby Unredonia from streaming across the border. Unable to go back and not allowed to go forward, they stayed at the border crossing and slowly a shanty town built up. As Unredonia recovered and trade resumed, it became the important and cosmopolitan trading center that it is today.”
  • “Decrying the decay in morality of modern society during the reign of Black Elfzer, the population instituted a puritanical regime of local laws that forcibly returned to the morality and social customs of 100 years earlier. By repressing every modern convenience, service, and utility, they have remained a frozen snapshot of village life from a past age, now 250 years out of time; a “purity” maintained by virtue of the most draconian laws in the Nation. For 150 years, they have had no tolerance for outsiders and permitted strangers no ‘liberties’.”
Location Tales 2: Geography

What’s the dominant geographic feature of the location? List no more than three, with minimal description (one line each).

Location Tales 3: Language

What’s the dominant language of the location, and what are the odds that anyone speaks any other language?

Location Tales 4: Society

In a line or two, if you haven’t incorporated it into the history, describe the society.

Location Tales 5: Most Noteworthy Features

Every location is distinctive in some fashion. These are often part History or part Geography. In my home town, it was the place where the highway crossed the railroad tracks by making a pair of 90-degree turns that led onto the main shopping street; in my Mother’s adopted home, many of the streets are paved all the way to the curb (instead of having dirt-and-gravel shoulders to the curb); in another town I know, the streets are phenomenally wide because they park in the middle of the road at 90 degrees to the flow of traffic in each direction, with shade provided by large trees along that median area. Sydney has its Opera House, Harbor, and Harbor Bridge. There’s no need to be any more substantial than these examples.

In particular, are there any Wonders (natural or artificial) nearby?

Location Tales 6: Other Claims To Fame

Every location also has a claim to fame of some sort. These can be festivals or street fairs or annual shows or parades or some commonality that many of the local areas share – “the town of apples”, “home of the world’s biggest pumpkin”, and so on. My hometown has just become the home of the largest solar panel farm in all of Australia – 102 Megawatts from 1.3 million solar panels.

Few embrace these claims as thoroughly as Salem, Massachusetts, scene of the infamous Witch Trials; there is a museum; street signs have a witch motif, and so do many of the local businesses. For a gamer, this is an incredibly useful model to emulate, because the thematic connection reinforces the uniqueness of the location every time it gets mentioned – and this approach lets it be mentioned a lot.

Location Tales 7: Strangers

How do the locals treat Strangers? Although this subject can usually do with some amplification, because it’s directly relevant to how the PCs will be received, it’s often difficult to state more than a line or two while being meaningful.

Location Tales 8: Folklore

There’s sure to be some local folklore or superstition. Sometimes this has a sound basis in fact, at other times, not. In my home town, it was that the worst flooding would always occur during drought years, and that the petrol prices were inflated to subsidize cheaper prices in the city.

Location Tales 9: Getting There

How do you get to the location – and what are the most significant obstacles along the way?

Location Tales 10: Staying There

When you get there, where can you stay? There seems to be a default assumption in D&D games that every town has an inn – but it isn’t necessarily so. Maybe you have to negotiate with a local for barn space, and the bar is just for drinking – with insufficient demand for the maintenance of accommodation services.

Location Tales 11: Shopping There

What’s the shopping like? Are there any surprises? In Nyngan, for example, fruit and vegetables cost rather more than most would expect; it’s a farming district that is mostly wheat and sheep and some cattle. Just about everything else has to be trucked in, and as a result, costs a great deal more than would normally be expected. There is a greater reliance on frozen and canned foods and less on fresh, for the same reason, or at least that was the case when I lived there!

Location Tales 12: Visuals

You’ve got three choices within this category: one is to decide that there is no value in searching for a visual to display; another is to actually perform an image search and to list the chosen images (which should be downloaded and saved, because they might not be there when you need them!); and the third is simply to list the keywords that you think will lead you to an image when the time is right, because the image you want might not be on the net yet!

My preference is to list the keywords and do a fast image search – but not to spend a lot of effort at this point in time.

I think it’s worth a quick search, because an image can inspire descriptions and ideas when the time comes to expand on this bare-bones outline; but don’t panic if I don’t find a good one.

Location Tales 13: Uniqueness

In a nutshell, what is it that is going to make this location unique in terms of the plot? This isn’t “why the location is in the plot”, it’s how the various aspects of uniqueness are going to be expressed to make the location distinctive within the plot. This is how you ensure that the location doesn’t feel tacked on – by integrating the location with the plot.

Location Tales 14: An opportunity for exploration?

Is it worth scheduling a prior visit to the location for the PCs – one with the leisure for exploring the region? In some cases, the answer will be yes, in others the answer may be no. But now is the time to insert a minor adventure with no metagame purpose but to take the PCs somewhere that will become more important later, if you decide that’s warranted.

I especially like to do so if the location is going to be radically changed when the PCs arrive there for the “real” adventure, because it gives you the opportunity to have them invest, emotionally, in the place and the people. Make it matter before they get there “for real”, and they will care when the time comes.

Location Tales 15: Name

Finally, the name. This is left to last because you may want the name to reflect one of the uniquenesses that you’ve assigned; you certainly don’t want it to conflict with the tone that you have established through the history and the claims to fame. If the place is to be rustic, it needs a rustic name.

So important is the right name that I’ve done a whole series on the subject. I particularly want to draw the reader’s attention to Grokking The Message: Naming Places & Campaigns, for reasons of obvious relevance.

Connect Ideas to empty content boxes

At this point, you’re done adding adventures to the plotline – but in almost every case, there will be details that have been left blank in those adventures. The preceding content generation exercises in this article will have filled some of these details in, but not all. So the next step is to open up your ideas file and fill in all the blanks. You want to know the basic structure of each adventure, where it is to happen, what is to happen, who is to be involved, and how it all connects to the big picture before the time comes to actually construct any of the adventures.

This is a road map of where you expect the campaign to go; it isn’t intended to bind anyone to anything. That’s why the substantial elements are to be delivered on a just-in-time basis, and why part of each adventure is what you have to start developing, when, in order for it to be ready when its’ going to be needed.

Final Decisions

But there are still some empty boxes, deferred until this moment that need to be filled first.

What to Keep/Dump Revisit

Back in the information dump phase, there were a number of 50/50 decisions that were put off. It’s time to revisit all of those undecided questions and make a decision, one way or another, on what legacy carry-forwards you are going to include in the campaign. All the choices that these were waiting on have now been made – the last ones in the course of this article.

Many of these questions, which were filed in the “too hard” basket at the time, should now have self-evident solutions. I usually discover that the more of them that I can now answer, the easier the others are – so I start with a very quick run-through making those self-evident choices and then returning for the final, more difficult issues.

For example, let’s say that you have a decision deferred regarding an interpretation of the Elvish relationship with nature. In the past, you had given Elves an ability to communicate with trees as though they had a sort of gestalt intelligence, once “awakened” by the Elves. Because of this environment, the animal inhabitants of an Elvish Forest also became somewhat more aware and sentient than their external counterparts, leading to a template that was applied to “Elf-touched Creatures”. The combination, and the willingness of the trees to shape themselves in ways that accommodated Elvish desires, produced a unique look-and-feel to the Elvish homeland. All these subsequent decisions should have been held in abeyance, pending the decision mentioned at the start of the Paragraph. At this point in time, you know a lot more about Elves and how they will interact with the proposed campaign, so you should be able to decide whether or not they are already distinctive without the need for this interpretation, or whether the ideas that you’ve already integrated into the campaign would be enhanced by this collection of Elven “facts” – so the decisions will flow like dominoes from that initial starting point.

Or perhaps it was a decision about whether or not to retain the Hit Location house rule that you had used quite satisfactorily in the previous campaign. By now, you have a much clearer idea of whether or not this level of specificity enhances or detracts from the overall look-and-feel of the proposed new campaign, of what other house rules are going to be required, and of whether or not that leaves enough capacity for detail for this to be retained – it might be that the decision has been made that a more abstract handling of game mechanics will better suit the new campaign, or there might be a different interpretation of Hit Points that is incompatible with a hit location mechanic. The decisions that have been made leave it far easier to complete the decisions that are still outstanding.

These decisions, will, of course, further expand on the various notes files you have.

Anything I’ve overlooked!

Compliments from others notwithstanding, I can’t think of everything! For example, if I have decided as part of the preceding revisit that some locations are blessed while others are cursed, with corresponding modifiers to various activities, you should go through all the key locations and decide the blessed/cursed status of each; you should go through the various key NPCs and antagonists and determine whether they derive from a blessed or cursed location, and what impact that’s had on them; and whether they currently live in a blessed/cursed region, and what effect that has.

Dot the I’s and cross the T’s. The goal is to make every campaign different, and that means that general advice can only go so far.

The Initial Sandbox

The final step within this phase of campaign creation is to assess the initial “sandbox” – do you have everything you need to develop it properly? Is there anything that you’ve overlooked? How are you actually going to begin the campaign? And Where?

And so, at last, you are ready to actually create the campaign. What you have so far is like a child’s coloring book, in which you have chosen what colors are to go into each space – but which you haven’t yet filled in. The hard work is over, now it’s time for the hard work to begin… and that statement will make a lot more sense, and be a lot more fun, than it seems at the moment after you’ve read the next part in this series. The end is beginning to show up on the horizon…

Comments (1)

Pacing and the value of the Pause


“2011 zero-mx action-06 1680×1200 press” by Muc10 (own work). Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons. Click on image to view terms of usage.

Discovering The Principles

This was originally envisaged as one small and relatively quick article. It didn’t work out that way. Instead, this is the first part of three…

I was watching a repeat of an old TV show the other week – one that had been subsequently re-cut to facilitate more ad breaks – and noted some extremely interesting consequences of the editing. Those gave rise to some additional thoughts on the pacing of an RPG game session, and a few lessons that can be derived from that and related observations.

Breaks In All The Wrong Places

The first thing that I noticed was that the ad breaks all seemed to fall in “the wrong places”. They sometimes didn’t come at the end of a scene, but would occur in mid-scene, with the dialogue being continued immediately after the break. The post-break dialogue when this occurred always seemed flatter, in terms of emotional connection and drama, than it had been previously; it dragged, as though we had been conditioned by television to expect the scene to end only for it to continue, possibly at some length. It didn’t matter how vital or important the content of the post-break portion of the scene was, the pacing was wrong.

More often, breaks still occurred at the end of scenes, but quite often the content of the scene that followed the break suffered from the same problem. The scene that preceded the break would be one that promised immediate action and drama, in part because of it’s pre-break placement, while the scene that followed would be exposition or dialogue or something else low-key. Again, the scene fell flat and for a period of time, the show was less engaging than it would otherwise have been.

This wasn’t the first time that I had noted these impressions without thinking anything more about them; in the past, I had associated this with the insertion of breaks into a movie when televised, because the movie was never intended to pause for advertising at that particular point in time. Because of the intrusive nature of the break into story flow in this circumstance, I ignored the phenomenon, paying as little attention to it as possible, because anything else might have made it worse. Instead, I shifted focus during the breaks – get a drink, get a snack, use the facilities, channel-hop, write something, whatever. This distracted me from the break so that when the movie returned, it was as though I had pressed the pause button on a DVD.

Because I was seeing the phenomenon under different circumstances – a show designed to have three advert breaks, and four acts, which now had four breaks – I was able to perceive the events from a slightly different perspective, and that enabled me to discover the significance in what I was observing.

The Absence Of A Break

Once I had noticed the impact that having a break in the wrong place was having, I began paying more attention to the pacing of the plot, and another phenomenon that I had noticed on previous occasions became apparent: the absence of a break when one was expected. There would be a dramatic moment and a fade to black followed immediately by a fade-in on a relatively low-key scene. It was as though you were trying to hit a moving target but kept over-anticipating and hence missing the target. Again, the pacing felt off, somehow.

I had previously observed this phenomenon when watching DVDs of TV shows. Most of the time, the fade-to-black for a commercial break was fine, but every now and then, the following scenes would fall flat or feel out of step with the rhythm established before the non-existent break. But, as with the “inserted breaks” mentioned above, I had thought nothing of it on those previous occasions; we never talk about this sort of thing, after all, being far more interested as fans and viewers in the content than the delivery.

It showed me that even back in the early 1970s, television producers were striving to take advantage of the advertising breaks that they knew would be imposed upon their products, and had devised techniques to make these interruptions work on their behalf. They may not have always been successful, but that’s true of any experiment. But, in modern times, it showed that the absence of a break when one was natural could be just as harmful and deflating as inserting a break where one should never be found.

The content prior to the break-that-should-have-been-there built up to a crescendo of tension – and nothing happened. It was as though the level of drama had a momentum of its own that was calculated to catapult viewers back to the screen at the correct level of dramatic tension, but that took time to achieve that effect. When there was no break, the programme overshot the mark quite a bit – it was pushing when it should be pulling, you might say.

It was at this point that I remembered a line in, I think, “Dream Park” by Larry Niven and Stephen Barnes, which talked about Disney using the psychology of waiting time to build anticipation when the rides for Disneyland were being designed. I had never really thought that this was all that relevant to the internal construction of a TV show, never mind an RPG session, but I was starting to see unexpected connections.

We’re used to thinking of waiting times as a source of frustration, and – when it comes to being served in a restaurant or business – that’s quite reasonable. Certainly, the negative aspects of queuing and waiting time dominate the research sources that a Google Search produces for consideration. Searching Wikipedia for articles on “waiting time” and “anticipation” bring up all sorts of articles that are both tantalizing and yet not directly relevant. My conclusions, at this point, were in stark contrast to that perspective – I was quickly forced to the conclusion that waiting times, correctly applied, could be not only a positive factor, but a vital tool in the entertainment process.

Break Incognito

Before I go too far down that path, however, there was one other phenomenon that I observed and that warrants scrutiny: the “invisible break”, where internal content functions as though it were a break in the plot, even though it isn’t one. These are what I sometimes think of as “Meanwhile” or “Elsewhere” moments, but not all of these seem to work. It took me a lot of thought to identify the factors that were at play, and even now I’m not 100% certain I have them all correctly assessed.

First, there’s relevance. The content of the “invisible break” has to be relevant to the main action, explaining a why or how about it. One example is having one character facing an opponent or situation who is far stronger or more dangerous than he is supposed to be or expected to be while another character is elsewhere, discovering the reasons for that increase in effectiveness.

Next, contrast is important. If the main action is violent or action-oriented (and it usually is) then there should be lots of shouting, excitement, and noise while the “break” should be cool, calm and collected. This helps keep the break distinct from the main sequence. This is relatively easy in a TV show, where it is easy to hard-cut between the two scenes and you can even have the calm dialogue over the top of the action. I mention this because it can be much harder to achieve in an RPG.

The final factor is duration, and it’s the hardest to pin down. The break needs to be long enough to have its own level of significance, but not so long that it overshadows the main action in importance. This is not only a variable quantity in its own right, it is variable according to the precise content of the main sequence. Now, that’s an inconvenience when editing a TV show, but you can cut and trim until the timing is exactly right. In any RPG application of these thoughts, that’s not going to be so easy.

Nevertheless, there is a way, and while it’s getting ahead of myself slightly in the article, this is the best time to explain this part of the the technique. It relies on having prepped a combination of ad-hoc and pre-scripted dialogue. The pre-scripted part consists of a couple of lines of dialogue between two participants that leads directly to one of them providing the key information or resolving the scene. You can then pad with as much incidental ad-hoc dialogue as you need until your GM’s instinct tells you the scene is approaching it’s length limit – then switch seamlessly to the pre-scripted dialogue. Note that this will only work if the revelatory dialogue is succinct and to the point – no long-winded explanations or chains of logic; use those as the content of the ad-hoc conversation, if necessary!

Episodic Breaks: Good & Bad

Of course, there’s another sort of break that bears contemplating because of its impact on the pacing of the content – the end of episode break in a more serial environment, such as a two-part episode, which is to last until the start of the next episode. That could be just a matter of seconds if watching the show on a DVD or it could be a day, or a week – or it could be several months, in the case of an end-of-season show.

Because the show needs to sustain interest over a longer period, and – if possible – water-cooler buzz and speculation that keeps the memory of the show alive – the content immediately prior to the break needs to be even bigger and more dramatic than that of lesser breaks. There are two essential techniques: the cliffhanger and the paradigm shift.

The Cliffhanger

The cliffhanger leads a situation unresolved, even seemingly incapable of being resolved in favor of the protagonists. While cliffhanger scenes were used in television and movies, and were a mandatory ingredient of Saturday Morning Serials and radio dramas, the modern usage really hit its stride with the “Who Shot J.R.?” phenomenon at the end of the 1979-80 season, which had most of the western world hooked until the anticlimax revelation several episodes into the subsequent season.

These days, we’d describe it as having Gone Viral, but the term (like the web itself) had not yet come into existence; even without that instant explosion creating a critical mass of opinion, the question was the topic of social conversation for months. It became the prototype for the modern end-of-season cliffhanger.

The dramatic tension of the unresolved situation demands some sort of resolution immediately following the break. Where the producers and writers of Dallas were especially clever is that they were able to resolve the shooting itself and its aftermath, i.e. the immediate situation, while leaving the larger question hanging for months after the show resumed. But this also became a liability, as the buzz about the situation continued to build until it became impossible to deliver anything but an anticlimax. And that’s the big danger with a cliffhanger – that the payoff doesn’t live up to the expectations.

Things are a little different when it comes to RPGs. The closer analogy is to part one of a mid-season two-part episode, which doesn’t have to quite set such a high standard. However, many gaming groups don’t meet over the Christmas period, simply because there are more outside social obligations to get in the way, so you might end up with an end-of-season analogue as well.

The Paradigm Shift

The alternative is to end your season with a resolved, self-contained plot, but one that nevertheless engenders interest in what is to follow by ratcheting up the intensity, threat level, or importance of what can be expected in the next season. One of the most common approaches is to package the final episode as a Paradigm Shift, i.e. the delivery system for some revelation that completely alters the fundamental foundations of the series.


“Trajectoria parabòlica” by Arturo Reina Sánchez. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons. Click on the image to view terms of use.

The Utility Of The Pause

Clearly, pauses can be extremely useful, though this utility can operate on negatives as well as positives if the pause is mistimed, mishandled, or of incorrect duration. I keep finding myself thinking about ballistics.

The illustration shows a ball in ballistic flight. It starts with a certain velocity, i.e. a certain energy in this case, an energy of movement) which continues to elevate the ball until gravity slows it’s vertical motion to a stop – and then it begins to decline, at first only slowly, becoming more and more rapid with each interval of time. In a very similar way, the pre-break content “launches” the plot’s emotional energy, which continues to grow for a while, but then begins to decline, a decline that increases in pace with each passing time interval. A break functions, then, as a natural amplifier – for a while – increasing whatever the mood was, on-screen, just prior to the break, through the power of anticipation.

Complicating The Ballistics

Of course, it’s not quite that simple. Emotions of a given type can only be sustained for so long. The analogy would be for a second ballistic trajectory to be in play – one that began at the commencement of the scene, and operates throughout – and for there to be a “lethargy barrier” which constrains the audience’s capacity and tolerance for that emotional energy. You can’t go from zero to 100 in one step, you need to build up to it in a series of smaller gains, followed by partial relief, before building up again from the new base point. What’s more, the “angle of launch” is effectively varied by other content in the course of the broader scene – interruptions and side conversations and cutaways and whatever.

Now think about a motorcycle jump – this also follows a parabolic arc, but requires the moving object to land on the other side. The altitude of the landing point can also be quite different to that of the launch, and that is all that’s required to make this a useful analogy to make. The landing point is the post-break content – and if it’s too high for the trajectory of the moving motorcycle, or too low, the results are a horrific crash. Only if you get the height exactly right is there a seamless transition from pre-break to post-break. And, because the vertical speed is changing all the time, the time interval – the length of the break, in other words – is a critical element in determining what “the right height” actually is.

Fortunately, audiences have a might broader tolerance than motorcycle stunts – you don’t need to get the landing point “exactly” right, only right within that tolerance level.

Used correctly, a break builds anticipation and gives tension elements and drama a chance to increase to new levels as though there was exciting content on-screen. But anything can be amplified, and the timing has to be correct, and the launch energy and landing elevation have to be a reasonably matched pair – so there are many ways to get it wrong.

The Gaming Break

All of which is quite interesting in and of itself, but this is a gaming blog. So let’s now start to seriously contemplate the value and necessity of breaks during gaming. To differentiate them, I intend to use the term “Pause” to describe such gaps in play, leaving the term “break” for use in referring to media analogies.

The earlier discussion has been very useful, insofar as it’s told us what needs to be considered when examining the role a break can play in a successful gaming session. There are three major plot functions that a pause can fill: Punctuation, expectation, and linkage. There are a number of basic types of pause within gaming – I have a list of seven, from a metagame perspective. I’ll go into all of these within the rest of this article.

In part two, I’m going to look at the construction of the gaming pause. I have identified four types of pre-pause activity, some good and some bad (in terms of the effects that the pause will have). The same four types of activity can also exist post-pause, so there are 16 combinations of types of plot content that can be connected by a pause – not all of them successful. Then there’s the pause itself; there are all sorts, from both and in-game and out-of-game perspective. I’ve come up with a list of nine that I think reasonably comprehensive, bringing the total number of possible combinations to a rather unwieldy 144.

In part three, I’ll attempt a broad, in-principle analysis of those 144 combinations, first looking at combinations that work, and then at combinations that don’t, and in particular looking for common patterns. I’m then going to wrap the series up by looking at how you can analyze whatever circumstances you find yourself in to determine the most useful course of action for you to take at any given moment. Call a break? Don’t call a break? Start the next scene/activity before a break? Start it after? Interrupt it mid-way? How long should the break be? The timing is everything! Finally, I’ll talk about building break-points into your games in advance – how many there should be, and how often they should occur.

Pause as Punctuation

The first major function of a pause is to serve as punctuation. This can be a full stop, an exclamation point, or an ellipsis (…).

The Break as a Full Stop

A scene has been resolved or concluded. The break puts an interval in real-time between that scene and what follows. Audiences and players subconsciously associate a real-time interval with an in-game interval, so the plot can either resume immediately after the pause or a period of time can be hand-waved out of existence by the GM, effectively saying “nothing of significance occurs until…”

This can be important, because without such a real-time break, the subsequent scene feels like it is occurring immediately after the resolution. This can feel rushed, even forced. It puts the players (who are still on a high from the scene that was just resolved) out of emotional step with their characters (for whom it was some time ago), so the absence of an appropriate pause can actually hinder game-play.

What’s more, players can be mentally fatigued by the concentration required in certain kinds of scenes, whether that’s an exciting battle, a confrontation of high drama, or a period of hard thinking and absorbing of information. A break can give the player time to recuperate – often at a price in the latter case, as details become lost or blurred in memory.

Full stops are important. Most paragraphs end with one for a reason.

The Break as an Exclamation Point

A scene has just begun that promises exciting action, some revelation has just come to hand, or a dramatic pronouncement has just been made. The break can function as an exclamation point that lets the significance sink in, and the ramifications grow in significance in the minds of the players. It heightens the drama of the situation.

Again, this can come with a price-tag, and there will be times when the price is too high. These costs are similar but not necessarily the same in all three cases.

With the promise of action, it can negate any surprise experienced by the players, giving them time to formulate plans of action. This is fine if the characters are less likely to be caught off-balance than the players, but can be counterproductive when this is not the case. The depth of planning possible is a factor to be considered when determining the length of the pause.

In the case of a revelation, the shock value can wear off to at least some extent. How much effect this has depends on the magnitude of the shock dealt to the players. Some developments are so stunning that players can respond, “I don’t know what to do” – which makes for rather dull gaming, and can even be fatal to the characters if hostile NPCs are present who were not stunned by the revelation. However, if the revelation holds significance beyond the immediate situation, especially significance with respect to the future rather than the past, the pause can give that significance time to grow in the minds of the players exactly as it would do in the minds of their characters. There is no definitive right-or-wrong general answer; it depends on the nature and scope of the revelation, the degree to which the players have anticipated it (which can be entirely different to the degree that their characters have anticipated it), the personalities involved, and more besides. You’re the GM, you have to make the call.

In the case of a dramatic pronouncement, the effects and possible consequences of a break are the same as for a revelation, but the circumstances are entirely different. What may have been undesirable in the case of a revelation can be entirely appropriate under this circumstance.

The general rule of thumb for both of the latter cases is that the more you want the players and PCs to be able to respond smoothly to the pronouncement, the more utility you will get out of a break; the more you want them to feel the shock, the more undesirable a break at that point becomes.

The Break as an Ellipsis

An ellipsis is somewhere in between the first two applications. It generally emphasizes an ominous foreboding imparted by the plot sequence which has just occurred. They are actually easier to define in the negative – what they aren’t, rather than what they are.

The exclamation mark and full stop generally signal a change in the emotional intensity of the scene that is about to unfold, compared to the one that has just unfolded. They may or may not also signal a change in the emotional content, i.e. the tone. An ellipsis conveys much less of an expectation of a change in intensity, or an expectation of a much smaller change of intensity, while definitively flagging a change in tone, usually toward the grim, dark, or serious. Contemplate the following four examples of the use of an ellipsis to conclude a scene:

  1. “Let’s get to work.”
    “And, when we’ve finished, it’s Payback Time…”
  2. “You know he’s not going to come quietly, don’t you?”
    “Yes, but one way or another, I’ll make it happen…”
  3. “Whatever it takes, Whatever the cost, he’s going down for this…”
  4. “I’ve decided to ask Juliet to marry me…”

In all cases, they are suggesting a change in emotional content that’s about to occur, and promising a deferred change in intensity, and they all have in common a decision that has been made in the course of the scene that they conclude.

Another way of looking at it is this: the full stop suggests that what follows can be handwaved, at least up to a certain point where it is approaching fruition. The Ellipsis says that rather than hand-waving that subsequent period of preparation or cleanup or response, it needs to be presented in-game, that it is going to be significant.

Pause as Expectation

Pauses can also be viewed as a function to convert expectation into anticipation. The expectation that derives from the pre-pause scene is that something is going to happen as a result; anticipation builds during the break because that expectation is not being fulfilled, making the release of anticipation far more intense when it eventually does occur.

A common element of many of the examples of breaks in the wrong place when thinking of television programs was the fact that no expectation had been created.

Contrast the following examples of break placement:

  • “The flying saucer lands on the grassy plain…”
    “As you watch intently, a door appears as a line in the hull and then begins to slowly grind open; revealing, in the blindingly-bright interior, first the feet, and then the entire silhouette, of the the pilot.”
  • “The flying saucer lands on the grassy plain, and the outline of a door appears in its hull…”
    “As you watch intently, the door begins to slowly grind open. Within, you can see nothing at all because it is blindingly bright, but slowly the feet of the pilot, and then his entire silhouette, can be made out.”
  • “The flying saucer lands on the grassy plain. The outline of a door appears in its hull, and begins to slowly grind open!”
    “At first, all you can see is blinding light, but slowly, his feet first, the pilot’s silhouette is revealed.”
  • “The flying saucer lands on the grassy plain. As you watch intently, a door appears as a line in the hull and then begins to slowly grind open, revealing first the feet and then the entire silhouette of the the pilot!”

Each of the examples places the immediate focus of the post-break action on a slightly different element of the scene. In the first, the flying saucer itself is the object of dramatic focus during the break, suggesting that the identity of the pilot is less dramatic than his mode of transport. In the second, it is the appearance of a door, and the focus is on the question of when it will open. In the third, the door has opened, and the emphasis is on what is about to be revealed, and in the fourth and final example, the dramatic emphasis during the break is all about who the pilot is; the mode of transport is rendered unimportant in comparison with that identity, and since the mode of transport is very dramatic indeed, the promise, and the expectation, is that the pilot’s identity will be earthshakingly important. If that subsequently is not the case, or not sufficiently the case, the post-break scene will be an anticlimax.

This is also a problem in the second example, but it has the drama of the door slowly griding open, followed by the the revelation of the pilot, to sustain interest and overcome whatever level of anticlimax may have resulted. Similarly, the third has the same advantage, simply occurring in a different point in the sequence of events. The first example is perhaps the most pure example of anticipation of the four, simply because so much of what’s about to happen is a mystery.

Pause as Linkage

A pause can link cause with effect, joining two halves of a particular scene. This is usually simply a different and much lower-key form of expectation and fulfillment, with the intervening period hand-waved. The characters decide to do something, there is a break, and then the results of that activity are shown. A break can even be used to imply cause-and-effect when no such relationship is immediately obvious, by virtue of this function.

The most extreme example that I have experienced was an experimental game session in which an unusual game structure was trialled. The PCs would learn about a situation in the course of roleplay, and decide what they were going to do about it. There would be a break. After the pause, the scene would be inside the chief villain’s lair as his subordinates informed him as to the results of the PCs action, and he reacted accordingly. The scene would then cut back to the PCs, hand-waving the resolution of their actions completely; play would resume with them assessing the effectiveness of their actions, roleplaying their post-activity interaction, and letting them decide what they were going to do next. Repeat the process until you reach the point where the PCs finally confront the villain.

This greatly accelerated the pace of the session, cutting out virtually all combat – so it will not work with all players. I subsequently found that this structure also works where the PCs are decision-makers with NPCs actually carrying out the decisions that they make, and ran an entire campaign based around this structure; instead of cutting to the villains, I simply had the NPCs reporting the results to the PCs.

Another time this structure could work is when the PCs are so effective in comparison to their enemies that victory in combat is a foregone conclusion; this would simply describe the outcome ex-cathedra.

It might seem like there are an awful lot of breaks involved, but in most cases, these don’t have to be what you actually think of as breaks; there’s enough variety (as you will see in part two of this series) that it becomes practical. Without jumping the gun too much, for example, contemplate two concurrent plotlines being run with the same characters; developments in one plot constitute a break in the other.

Pause as Thinking Time

The final function a pause, in game terms, is as a means of giving the players thinking time. This is especially important when the capabilities of the PC outstrip those of the player considerably; in effect, the break is a time-out for the player to think about his character’s options.

If you are going to use a break in this fashion, it’s important to tell the player, or his attention will be on whatever else is going on in the meantime, whether that’s side conversation or whatever. It can also be important for you to make yourself available to the player for discussion about the decision the character faces.

Finally, there is the question of whether or not you permit the player to discuss the subject with the other players without them necessarily playing the role of their characters. I generally permit this, with restrictions – the other player’s PC has to be there, so that if necessary, the conversation can be retconned or reinterpreted as character-to-character conversation.

Pause nature

There are seven types of pause from a metagame perspective. This system of classification, unlike the analysis that will appear in part two, can have any type of content; this is more about why there is a pause.

Deliberate Pauses

Most of what I’ve talked about has assumed that the GM has made a deliberate choice to pause at this point in play, intending to use that pause to the game’s benefit. Even if the decision is made for negative reasons – “A break is needed sometime soon, and this is the least harmful time to have it” – that is still a decision based on maximizing the entertainment value of the game for all concerned.

Natural Pauses

It might not be obvious, but there are times in a game session where play naturally pauses, usually to permit game mechanics to function. Examples include handing out experience, listing treasure, dealing with hit points and post-combat recovery, and even (at its most fundamental) the characters going to sleep. If you have any reason to hand-wave time, it constitutes a natural break. The decision that needs to be made when a natural pause becomes available is how best to take advantage of it; your choices come down to whether to eliminate the possibility of a pause being needed for other reasons, permitting a longer stint of uninterrupted play to follow, and what sort of scene you will reopen play with after the pause.

But there’s also another sub-variety that has to be considered. It’s my experience that players can only go so long without side chatter starting. This is yet another natural pause.

Forced Pauses

There are also times when you need to pause whether you want to or not. If it starts to rain, you may need to close windows. If someone trips over, you need to pause to ensure that they don’t need medical attention. If you’re dependent on a computer and the power goes out, you may be forced to stop play (depending on battery condition and the nature of the computer in question). A can of soda can have been agitated unintentionally and – when opened – sprays everywhere. People can suffer from sudden incontinence. Someone’s telephone can ring. There can be a knock on the door. The pizza delivery can arrive. A die can get lost under the table. Heck, the table, or a chair, can collapse (I’ve seen it happen)! The list of reasons goes on and on, and they all boil down to an intrusion by the real world on the gaming table.

When this happens, you have no choice as to the timing of the pause, and may have no choice as to its duration; all you can do is decide how to reengage the game following the forced pause.

Flawed Pauses

You can call a pause when you shouldn’t. This happens to everyone; experience teaches better judgment, but takes time, mistakes, and reflection to do its work. You usually can’t tell that a pause is of this type until after the fact.

In truth, pauses can be flawed only in two ways – the content prior to the pause, and the content after the pause. Everything else is manageable. Pause length is at best, a secondary factor, only relevant in the context of these content considerations.

One of the greatest skills that you can develop (within the context of Pause Handling and Pacing) is the ability to recognize a flawed pause while still in the pause, giving you the opportunity to adjust the game accordingly. Insert an additional scene, if you have to! Have a salesman knock on the door! Provide a moment of in-game levity! Tune in on a character’s private moment! Have something arrive in the mail! Something!

Or it might be that you are fighting an impending anticlimax. Throw in an accident to ramp up the activity/excitement! A soldier accidentally discharges his weapon. A car crashes, its driver distracted by whatever is going on. You spot an intruder on the gamma-bomb test range! A scuffle breaks out in the crowd, which is already close to rioting!

Remember those broader tolerances that I talked about a while back? Your intervention doesn’t have to be perfect – it just has to get you close enough to where you need to be to reach that tolerance level.

Unnatural Pauses

If, for some reason, you have cause to speak to a player privately, away from the game table – perhaps because the PC he controls is doing something the other players shouldn’t know about – it constitutes a natural break for that player/PC combination, but may not be a natural break from the point of view of the other players/PCs. There can be times, when you let your PCs pursue private agendas, where circumstances will intersect and they will cross paths, necessitating an interruption of dealing with one player/PC to get the other one up to the same point in time – simply because there’s only one of you, and no GM has yet mastered the trick of being in several places at the same time.

With careful planning, these problems can be minimized. I make it a point, when planning these solo scenes, of building in what I call potential pauses – a point where a natural break can be inserted in a solo plot sequence so that I can switch to handling another seamlessly.

The players are the other sources of unnatural pauses. It doesn’t happen often anymore – I have too much experience under my metaphoric belt – but whenever I am totally surprised or caught off-guard by a PC’s choice of action, I will deliberately call a break to think about how to handle the unexpected development. These actually work as pauses normally do, because the unexpected nature of the action that has triggered the pause is enough of a dramatic development to sustain a brief interruption. Again, one of the most important considerations is how best to restart the game after the pause.

This is also the case when I realize that I’ve gotten carried away with something at the game table and need to reassess the “big picture”. Again, this isn’t a mistake that I make as often as I used to, though it remains something I have to remain alert to.

Longer Pauses

Longer pauses need more careful handling than brief ones – meal breaks, for example, or someone needing to pop down to the corner store. The “ballistics” metaphor explains the reasons – the longer duration gives more time for reactions to occur. Either the action pre-break needs to be even more intense and dramatic in order to sustain the interest level through the longer break, or you need to cut to a lower-intensity scene (inserting one if necessary) if excitement will have waned.

Because these longer breaks give players a chance to discuss their options and plan, or simply think about the situation their PCs are in, it is sometimes helpful to require them to write down what they are trying to do at the moment the break begins and how they intend to go about it, simply to help them get back into the head-space that they were occupying on behalf of their characters before the break.

Ending On A High: The ultimate Pause

Of course, the ultimate pause is the end of the day’s play. If the adventure has come to an end, that’s not a problem; but if this is only part one of two, three, or more, it can be vitally important. Especially if there is any risk at all that your next-scheduled game date might not happen! You may need to sustain interest for a lengthy period of time; failure to do so can kill campaigns. And that’s no fun for anyone!

My usual pattern is to start from an abstract or theoretical perspective and explore my way to practical application of what analysis of that exploration reveals. Because this article has been divided, we are still midway through that process; most of the practical advice is still to come. Hopefully I’ve been able to include enough nuggets along the way to make the article worthwhile!

Comments (2)

Fogs, Clouds and Confusion: A Battlemap technique


Another filler post, I’m afraid – the next part of the New Beginnings series is turning out larger than I expected! I intended to get an early start on it yesterday, but thought of an article for later this week and started putting thoughts down on electronic “paper”, and totally lost track of time.

Have you ever thought about the best way to depict mists and fogs on a battlemap? For next to no-cost?

It’s not all that easy, but I have a solution to offer. What you will need:

  • Your battlemap tiles
  • A box of tissues or tracing paper, the thinner the better
  • A little Blu-tack or equivalent
  • At least two matching decks of playing cards that you don’t mind destroying (can be re-used in the future)
  • A pair of scissors, sharp if possible
  • Two small containers for storage – you can use the packs that the cards came from, in a pinch
  • (Optional) a bag of cotton-wool balls (can be re-used if stored afterwards)

Step One: Select your tiles

Since there is a little prep involved, start by selecting the tiles that you are going to need. That prep will be relatively quick – a matter of half a minute or less per tile, once you get into the swing of things – but it does take time.

Step Two: Organize by size

The process is slightly different for different sizes of tile, so organize them accordingly.

Step Three: Wrap tiles

Wrap tiles tightly in the paper, using the blu-tack in SMALL quantities to join sheets together and trimming the tissue paper as needed. The idea is that you want to be able to see the tile through the base “fog” just enough for the tiles to function and hint at what’s underneath, while showing that vision is impeded.

Note that the amount of blu-tack is very important – you don’t want any of it to come into direct contact with the tile, because the volatiles (oils?) that make the blu-tack malleable can discolor the tiles. If you’re especially paranoid about that, you can use sticky tape (sticky face out) to provide a line of insulation along the tissue paper where the blu-tack is to be placed (not shown on the diagram, this is an afterthought).

It’s important to secure the paper so that it doesn’t shift during the course of play; if this weren’t a factor, I’d just lay sheets of the stuff over the top of the finished battlemap.

In a pinch, you can skip this step, but it adds so much to the verisimilitude of the scene that it is worthing doing if you possibly can. You may need to use a pencil to lightly draw the outlines of the tile squares on the tissue very quickly (press lightly to avoid damaging the tile). In particular, when representing fogs and mists generated by spellcasters, you will have to live without this step.

Step Four (only needs doing once): Halve One Deck

Take one deck of the cards, and if you haven’t done so already, cut them in half horizontally across the card, as close to mid-way as you can manage. This gives you large tokens for use in areas of 4 squares x 4 squares. Store these in a suitable container, ready for use.

Step Five (only needs doing once): Tokenize the other deck

Take the other deck of cards. Cut off the corner icons that show suite and card number from each corner. Then cut out each pip showing on the rest of the cards into roughly square tokens. Store these in a suitable container, ready for use.

Step Six: lay out your battlemap

This step excludes placing “decorations” like barrels, chairs, light sources, stairs, and any elevated features. What you want here is the basic ground-level terrain.

Some outdoor-setting tiles may cause you some head-scratching. A building’s roof is an “elevated feature” isn’t it? Or is it? What about forest tiles with trees?

Make the choice for yourself based on two criteria – the thickness of the paper wrapping (if it’s thin enough, you can get away with considering these ground-level), and whether or not you have some other tiles that you can use to represent just the roofs or trees. Green glass beads for trees can be an excellent choice – in which case the beads are the “elevated features” and the tile is ground-level.

Note that every tile laid should feature the paper “mist”, except when you have had to skip the “wrapping” step.

Step Six-A: Decorate your battlemap excluding light sources and elevated features

Next, place every decorative tile (each wrapped in it’s own temporary covering of tissue paper) that isn’t going to show through the fog onto the battlemap. Tables, chairs, barrels, pits, wells, carts, whatever.

If you need to save a little time, by not sealing the ends of the tissue wrap, you can simply slide these between the tissue paper covering the larger tile and the tile it covers instead of wrapping these decorative tiles.

Step Seven: Define Fringe

Using the individual pips cut from the cards, define the outer fringe of the fog, one pip to every 2 squares is better. Note that fog and mist will expand into lower ground, so this might not be a smooth edge, and that if the entire area is covered in mist, there might BE no fringe showing on the map.

Step Eight: Define Heart

Separate out the tokens for the picture cards (Jack, Queen, King, and Ace). Place these on the battlemap to represent the thickest areas of fog, generally the terrain of lowest elevation or the center of an open area (especially one with a lot of water, like a lake), or possibly even one entire side of the battlemap. Use the half-cards for large tile areas (4 squares by 4 squares or 5×5) and the corners cut from the second deck for smaller areas (2×2 or 1×1). As a general rule of thumb, I will try to use black suits (spades and clubs) to indicate the presence of a “Dark Shape” visible though the fog, i.e. there’s something there, and red suits (hearts and diamonds) to indicate the absence of anything but white – which includes any lightly-colored objects that may be present. Every try to see a white car in fog? It’s twice as hard as seeing a dark car or moderately-toned car! But this may not be possible, depending on how many you need.

When you’ve finished, set aside the picture cards; you’re more or less done with them (save for occasionally changing your mind and extending the heart).

Step Nine: Separate Tokens & Half-Cards into “thick” and “thin” counters

Taking the tokens and half-cards that remain, separate them into three groups: single pips, low value counters (2-5), and high-value counters (6-10).

Step Ten: Draw & Place “Thick” counters

After randomly mixing the 6-10 group of counters, draw and place them one at a time in those areas where the fog will be at its thickest. This is anywhere that’s sheltered from wind, in a fringe surrounding the heart, and anywhere that’s under cover or shaded. Again, use the half-cards for large areas and the cut corners for details, and – if you’re going the extra step – the difference between dark suits and red suits.

“Thick” counters should not normally come into direct contact with the fringe, there should always be a gap of at least two squares, but use your own judgment according to the terrain.

As a rule of thumb, natural fogs should not be more than about 1/3 “thick” (excluding the heart), but that’s also something that you will have to judge according to the circumstances.

Note that this is a lot easier if you place the half-cards first and follow them with the tokens.

Step Eleven: Draw & Place “Thin” counters

Roughly count up the number of “thin” counters that you are going to need – one for every 2×2 space, not counting any areas large enough to use a half-card.

Divide the result by three, and add one for each large area where you intend to use a half-card.

Count out that many single pips and randomly scatter them between the fringe and “thick” areas.

Then randomly mix the 2-5 group of counters, drawing and placing them to complete filling up the fog-enshrouded area.

Step Six-B: Place light sources and elevated features onto battlemap

Over the top of the counters now placed over the battlemap, add your remaining tiles – light sources and elevated features. This includes glass beads being used for trees, etc. These (beads excepted) will need to have been individually tissue “coated”l, I’m afraid. Over each light source, lay about 1/4 of a cotton-wool ball that you have fluffed out and then pressed more-or-less flat, to represent the diffusion that occurs; quite often, you can tell there’s a light source but not what it is until you get closer, and it automatically makes the fog seem thicker.

Despite this, most governments recommend using headlights on low-beam in foggy conditions, not because it makes it any easier for you to see things (it doesn’t), but because it makes you more visible to others. What is lost in safety on the one hand is more than gained on the other.

In-play interpretation

All this may seem like quite a lot of trouble to go to. There is a method to this madness, however.

The numbers showing can be used to represent the relative thickness of the fog and mist, and hence the modifiers to the rolls for achieving various activities, given the conditions.


Assuming that you’re using a d20 system or something similar (works for 3d6-based systems as well), the DC or difficulty can be assessed as 5+variable for mist, 10+variable for light fog, and 15+variable for thick fog.

Actually, there are a couple of additional conditions that this system can be used for, noted below.


Mist is the thinnest of the three conditions that this is system can be used to simulate.

  1. Determine the direction the character is looking, or the direction to whatever he is looking for.
  2. Count out a range of 8 hexes/spaces in that direction, or until you reach an obstruction that can’t be seen through, like a wall.
  3. Total the values of the 3 lowest counters within that range and divide by 2, rounding down. Jack=11, Queen=12, King=13, Ace=15. Isolated pips are “1”.
  4. This is the “variable”; add a further 5 to get the modifier to any perception or concealment checks. For drizzle or light rain, divide by 3 instead of 2.
Thin Fog/Light Snow/Sleet/Heavy Rain/Thin Smoke

Next up the extremity scale is the above quintuple threat. Note that if you have two of these – fog and smoke, say – determine each separately and add the effects together. However, this would be quite an unnatural combination of conditions; I’m not saying that it couldn’t be made to happen, but the circumstances would be quite unusual.

  1. Determine the direction the character is looking, or the direction to whatever he is looking for.
  2. Count out a range of 4 hexes/spaces in that direction, or until you reach an obstruction that can’t be seen through, like a wall.
  3. Total the values of the highest and lowest single counters within that range and divide by 2, rounding down. Jack=11, Queen=12, King=13, Ace=15. Isolated pips are “1”.
  4. This is the “variable”; add a further 10 to get the modifier to any perception or concealment checks. For Smoke, add 5 instead of 10.

In the case of smoke, I would also use this modifier as the target to avoid coughing.

Thick Fog/Heavy Snow/Dense Smoke

At the most extreme, it can be very hard to see anything at all. Once again, if you can contrive circumstances by which two or more of these conditions are in effect at the same time, calculate the effects separately and then total them.

  1. Determine the direction the character is looking, or the direction to whatever he is looking for.
  2. Count out a range of 4 hexes/spaces in that direction, or until you reach an obstruction that can’t be seen through, like a wall.
  3. Total the values of the two highest counters within that range and divide by 2, rounding down. Jack=11, Queen=12, King=13, Ace=15. Isolated pips are “1”.
  4. This is the “variable”; add a further 15 to get the modifier to any perception or concealment checks.

In the case of smoke, I would also use this modifier as the target to avoid choking/asphyxia.

Combat Modifier

It’s harder to predict where an opponent is going to be and what he’s going to do when you can’t see him clearly. This should be reflected with an increase in their AC or DCV or equivalent – this applies to all combatants.

For ranged combat, use the adjustments given for “Perception”. Note that the target’s location qualifies as “an obstruction that can’t be seen through” in this context.

I would use the same calculation method given above, but reduce the modifier by 5.

Random changes

After a chit has been used in a calculation, there is a chance that it will change value. Simply draw a new one from the appropriate stack and replace the old, returning the discarded chit to the appropriate stack.

How great that chance is should be determined by the GM based on conditions. I would suggest 25% or 50% or 1-2 on a d6 or something along those lines, but a lot depends on what’s going on in this particular battle scene.


Store the counters, chits, and cotton balls, and remove the tissue paper from the tiles immediately after play, to minimize the chances of damage to the tiles from the blu-tack.


This proposal adds a lot of verisimilitude to a scene. It also does an excellent job of taking what would otherwise be a “universal” adjustment that applied to the whole battlefield and all combatants and making it a dynamic, changing environment. This also permits a new mode of interaction between characters and environment – a Fireball might cause fog to thin or lift temporarily, for example; simply adjust the non-variable amount accordingly.

Although I didn’t go into specifics above, you could also employ this system for underwater explorations – the clarity of the water, the presence of a light-source, and the density of the fish population being the factors that would be the modifier determinants. You could, perhaps, make your “tissue paper” from two or more panels of transparent blue contact plastic back-to-back.

I’m sure that there are applications for this system that simply haven’t occurred to me; as you could probably tell, I have been thinking of more throughout the writing of the article. Use it as you see fit!

Comments (1)

Taking advantage of the sensory heirarchy

forgemaster coins sample

As humans, we rely on our senses to connect us to the world around us. There is a hierarchy amongst those senses that GMs can take advantage of, the better to communicate with our players.

The Associated Senses

At the bottom end of the senses are the associated senses – the sense of balance, and of motion, and the senses of hot and cold. The first two are strongly linked but there’s not much that we can be do with them in a static session such as sitting around a game table (there’s one exception that I’ll get to a little later). The third and fourth are bound up with our sense of touch, as is the fifth, our awareness of texture. As such, I’ll deal with the “tactile super-sense” when I get to that level of the hierarchy.

The Flavor Senses

That brings me to the linked senses of taste and scent. It’s possible to do something with these, though it can be a lot of effort and sometimes not worthwhile. In fact, the sense of taste is a tightly-grouped collection of six different senses – the five basic flavors, plus that aspect of the tactile sense that is experienced through the tongue.


The sense of taste can be used by presenting flavor “samples” that are iconically associated with a particular region, and help connect the place with the player’s awareness. Serving a bowl of chili, or salsa and corn chips, is a great way to make players “connect” with the idea that they are in Mexico. It doesn’t matter whether or not they particularly like the food on offer; a small taste is all that’s needed. Similarly, curries are quintessentially associated with the Indian region and neighboring countries, cheesecakes and créme caramels with France, and so on. Your selections don’t even have to be geographically accurate provided that the association exists in the minds of the players.

Provided that you understand something about the relationship between climate, geography and the foods that can be grown in the resulting environment, and the cuisine that results, you can even link various regions of an invented world with existing real-world cuisines (perhaps with variations) to create an instant association. Steamed broccoli (Chinese style) dipped in soy sauce and then sprinkled with sugar, for example – it doesn’t have to be a mindblowingly brilliant flavor creation (so long as it isn’t nauseating), so long as it is distinctive. A mixture of apple juice and dry ginger ale as a non-alcoholic representation of Dwarven Ale? why not?


Scent is both more subtle and more profound a sense. Even the memory of a scent is enough to invoke strong memories of a flavor that can actually stimulate the taste buds as though we were really consuming the flavor in question. Focus on recalling, just for a moment or two, the scent of lemon and you will find that the taste-buds at the sides of the back of the tongue respond – and trigger salivation, just as the real thing would.

More than once, the power of scent has broken through an amnesiac barrier. There are particular combinations of scents that seem to go directly to the hind-brain and label a place as “home”. And scent has a big role to play in the perception of flavor, to boot – in fact, appearance and scent can completely or partially overcome our senses of what we are actually tasting, as has been shown by a number of fascinating psychological experiments over the years. (I’d love to link to some authoritative websites regarding the phenomenon but they are being drowned out by thematically-related sites about enhancing weight-loss ability using the techniques. The best that I can offer are this site, and this article from the BBC, I’m afraid).

But there’s more. Different scents have been found to influence the behavior of the brain – lavender makes us sleepy and sluggish, lemon scents stimulate the brain and make us more alert and aware. Unfortunately, a web-search on the subject is dominated by two areas that are only marginally valuable and a plethora of sites that either make unsubstantiated claims or are blatantly commercial or counterculture in nature – Aromachology and Aromatherapy. Most will have heard of the latter, fewer will know of the former. Wikipedia defines Aromachology as “the study of the influence of odors on human behavior” and “the relationship between feelings and emotions such as relaxation, exhilaration, sensuality, happiness and well-being brought about by odors stimulating the olfactory pathways in the brain and, in particular, the limbic system.”

In theory, you can use air fresheners, scented candles, and the like to create an “atmosphere” that simulates the environment. In practice, it’s very difficult to remove or neutralize the “scent palette” after releasing one odor so that the next can be appreciated without contamination. It can be managed by using small sealed containers (about 1 cubic inch) which contain a particular scent – open and inhale – but this is a LOT of trouble to go to, and probably not worth the effort.

You can adopt a simpler approach of selecting one dominant odor combination that reflects the most “important” scent of the day’s setting. Wildflowers and a lemon air-freshening spray, for example, or a sandalwood-incense odor that you deliberately associate with Orcs.

The other problem to be faced is that many people suffer from asthma and/or allergies to various substances, and you may inadvertently trigger an attack, and some people may simply not like the scent – I used to burn incense regularly at home when I wanted privacy because the people with whom I shared accommodations weren’t fans of the scent, while I liked it. These days, a combination of Lemon and Vanilla makes up my favorite environmental scent. But I’m wandering off-topic.

These difficulties and potential complications make this powerful tool less than universally-applicable. Think twice before using it, and make the relevant inquiries of your players in advance.


With each step up the sensory ladder, the sense being considered is both more powerful in communicating subtle aspects of the world and more accessible to us at the game table – a potent double-whammy that explains why many GMs never explore beyond certain core senses and obvious applications of those senses. Hearing is the first of those core senses, and often the only one relied upon by GMs. Certainly, when I first started playing RPGs, this was as far as it went – people spoke and that was it.

large dwarven platinum bar

Vocal Communications

The GM delivers a verbal description of the scene and environment and speaks on behalf of any NPCs. Each player responds with any verbal descriptions that the GM can’t provide (eg of their characters or actions) and speaks on behalf of the character they are playing, as well as requesting further details from the GM. Vocal communication is at the heart of every RPG that is not conducted in an online environment and many of those that are, as well. Only when the computer takes over the role of the GM and everyone is playing in a simulated world, ie a computer game, does vocal communication take a back seat; with text-based communications between a GM and one or more remote players either in a live-chat-room setting or by play-by-email taking somewhat of an intermediate space between the two extremes.

One of the earliest pieces of GM advice that I can remember reading had, as the subject, the enhancement of Vocal Communications through the use of accents and “alternate voices”. For all the ubiquity of this advice, I have only ever met one GM who I would regard as exceptional in this respect – his Cyberpunk campaign was weak in just about every other way, but he was insanely-gifted in his vocal malleability and capacity to be consistent. Most people just can’t do it, or can’t do it very well.

Ambient noise can pose an additional problem that can be difficult to overcome. Before you can think about anything more than the absolute minimum standards of vocalization, this needs to be eliminated as a factor.

One subject that rarely seems to get mentioned – including here at Campaign Mastery – is the degree of benefit that Public Speaking courses, and the Oratory techniques that they teach, can offer GMs. We all tend to focus more on the content than on the delivery; whether that’s because we consider it too obvious, or because the content tends to be rather more interesting, I don’t know. To partially redress the balance, here are a selection of websites and resources on the subject of oratory technique that are worth close examination, with comments concerning the relevance to our particular application of the subject:

  • How to Be a Better Orator – Basic introduction, with emphasis on prepared speeches. Steps three, five, and nine are particularly useless in an interactive situation like an RPG except when delivering canned text. If this was as good as it got, it might explain why few sources talk about improved Oratory as a way to better your GMing. But, as a beginning, it is still useful.
  • Articulation Exercises – Practical exercises to improve your diction and articulation. There’s not much about shaping the content for delivery, or oratorical design techniques, this is all about successfully enunciating and delivering the message.
  • Persuasive Speech from Nebo Literature – This covers the structural aspects that don’t get much of a mention at the preceding site; the two are a great one-two punch. You need to understand this stuff thoroughly to be able to use it without planning and forethought, but the benefits are well worth the effort of gaining that understanding.
  • Leadership Skills: The 5 Essential Speaking Techniques from The Genard Method – Wants to sell you a book on their technique, but as enticement, they offer some useful advice and a cheat-sheet to download. Not having used their technique, I can’t comment further on it. Links purport to take you to other useful content, I didn’t follow any of them to be able to verify. Recommended as a supplement to the preceding sites listed.
  • What can I do to quickly become a better orator/public speaker? – There are some useful tips, tricks, and techniques in the replies, and some things that are less useful to our particular purpose. But the hoped-for focus on “quickly” makes this worth a read. Use the information gleaned from the preceding sites as a means of assessing the usefulness of the advice on offer here.
  • Public Speaking For Dummies – The first of several books sold by Amazon that seem directly relevant. Take the free advice above and run with it as far as you can go – and then contemplate this and the books that follow to supplement your skillset and education on the subject. I’m relying on the established reputation for quality in the “for dummies” series in making this recommendation, but an average 4.5 stars out of 5 from 20 customer reviews adds to the confidence factor.
  • No Sweat Public Speaking! – This is all about overcoming the fear of speaking in public. In theory, it should be less relevant to GMing, but it isn’t, though it is tangential. I’ve been interviewed a couple of times (live “on the air”) because of my involvement in RPGs, I’ve been offered other interview opportunities since (podcasts and the like) but couldn’t manage the logistics, and I’ve been asked to speak in public at both weddings and funerals because of my association with the hobby (and a rep for doing it well, with both clarity and sincerity). Heck, I won a debate at the School Eisteddfod many many years ago because more organized and less nervous than my opponent – despite having only entered that morning, and written my speech just thirty minutes before it had to be delivered, cold (no rehearsal), and despite my being in third class, and him in his final year (“12th form” as it was then-known), a difference of nine years. The subject: Nuclear Energy. I had no time to research, he had weeks. And that was his downfall, as he had time for the task to prey on his mind… Make no mistake, if you begin to become a better public speaker, you WILL have opportunities to use the ability whether you want to or not! 5 stars average from 108 customer reviews mean you should consider buying this book!
  • Communicating Effectively For Dummies – Although not as highly-rated as “Public Speaking For Dummies” this volume might be more relevant to the RPG experience. Described as “how to get your point across at work and interact most productively with bosses and coworkers”. So, while it doesn’t mention “Players”, it sounds right on point.
  • Voice and Speaking Skills For Dummies – Although this offers to expand on the free advice on Diction and Articulation offered by one of the websites listed above, it isn’t rated as highly as the other Dummies books I’ve listed. However, there are only three reviews, so they can’t be considered enough to be a definitive review. Read the reviews at the bottom of the page and make your own assessment.
  • Public Speaking – Concise Concepts : No stories, just point form secrets the pro’s use! – Note that this is available only as a a Kindle E-book. No customer reviews, but it’s only 80 cents US – if you have a Kindle. Offered for those who do, and probably worth taking a chance on at that price.
  • 157 Most Asked Questions On Public Speaking – The newest and therefore most expensive of the books on offer, and no user reviews to use as a guide to the value of the book. But the description sounds promising: “It contains 157 answers, much more than you can imagine; comprehensive answers and extensive details and references, with insights that have never before been offered in print.” Worth serious thought, therefore.
  • Effective Speaking – The last of the resources to which I’m linking, this has only one review, and that of only three stars. The reason I’m listing it lies in the price – it’s cheap, even Very Cheap if bought second-hand – and the content of that review: “A good solid book…” “…all the essentials…” “…useful advice in straightforward language.” ‘Nuff Said.

scifi coin set

Audio Tapestries

Something that I have seen offered from time to time are audio tapestries (sometimes known as Ambient Environments) – essentially, sound effect/atmosphere compilations that can be looped to provide appropriate background noises. Assuming that he has a large enough library of such sounds, the GM simply has to cue up the appropriate track to fill the background with the chatter of bartering or the sounds of a ruined Gothic cathedral or whatever. If one doesn’t exist, sound effects libraries and the right software can enable you to create your own – the longer the loop, the less repetitive and more natural it will sound; the shorter, the smaller the file size will be. This is something I have always wanted to explore more thoroughly because I think it would add tremendously to the Ambiance of a game, but for one reason or another, every time I’ve gotten close to being able to do so, something has intervened. So it remains on my bucket list.

The only companies I’m aware of who produce these things are Toxic Bag and their Sound Products (all in my wishlist at DrivethruRPG) and Tabletop Audio, who have an excellent range of products. A Kickstarter project to create a tool to let GMs create their own ambient soundtracks failed to get up, unfortunately – I was asked to review and promote it but didn’t have the capacity to do so before the campaign concluded.

Beyond those two specific resources, two Google searches might lead you to more choices:

Background Music

Where you can’t get sound effects, appropriate background music may fill the gap. Music is used extensively in movies and TV shows to enhance the emotional content and visceral atmosphere of the images, but the producers work very hard at synchronizing the appropriate beats and sounds with the on-screen visuals; this can make RPG use of a musical soundtrack more difficult than it might initially seem. For that reason, the “ambient sounds” approach holds greater appeal to me.

For example, contemplate the Star Wars soundtrack. You might think that when you’re playing the Star Wars RPG that this would provide the perfect background ambiance, but it doesn’t work – you can be having a “these are not the droids you’re looking for” moment, or a “trust me (smile)” moment, when Darth Vader’s theme comes blasting out, or the main imperial theme. You can actually be better off with a whole bunch of instrumental pieces that have nothing to do with the subject matter, such as a Jean Michel Jarre album, or some generic science-fiction ambient sounds – especially if you lead off with the Star Wars main title theme to set the initial mood.

steampunk coin sample


Even more powerful than sounds is the sense of sight. It used to be the case that there were relatively few visual references available for use, and even if the images were there, you didn’t have the technology available to display them. Then the internet came along, and especially Google Image Search and Google Maps.

I’ve actually written an article or two on this subject before – see, for example:

…so I don’t intend to go too far into this subject in this article. Suffice it to say that a picture can, indeed, be worth 1,000 words (or more).

Using sight to stimulate the sense of motion

However, before I go any further, it’s time to delve into the exception to the sense-of-movement problems that I referred to early in the article. I have a pair of metal miniature bi-planes – I’m not sure of the scale, but they are about the size of the palm of my hand or a little larger – and they excel at enabling complex aerial maneuvers to be illustrated, translating movement into something visual. The wings are important because, being at right angles and straight out from the center of the model, they provide a visual horizontal plane that is readily visible from the outside; this wouldn’t work as well with swept-wing aircraft. In essence, they are (when viewed from above) a giant cross, with the tail longer than the head, so that position and attitude relative to the direction of future movement is readily visible. It only takes a little knowledge of the mechanics of flight – what you can pick up from Blue Max, for example, plus watching something like “Top Gun” once or twice – and you have all the tools you need to convey a dogfight. (I actually adapt Blue Max for the game mechanics of flight in my superhero campaign, it is worth noting).

If you don’t have a metal miniature, make a paper plane – it will be better than nothing, I assure you, and can convey action in a heartbeat that would easily require far more than 10,000 words to state, and would be both boring and capable of easy misinterpretation. If you have opposing flying characters, no matter what your game system, such a visual aid is a must-have!

Environmental Immersion

Technically, this isn’t a sense at all, and it’s also devilishly difficult for a GM to take advantage of, but I felt I needed to highlight it. Being somewhere is not the same as seeing a photo of it, and a photo doesn’t give the same sense of a location being real. This is a problem that TV and movies confront all the time, and they have developed techniques to combat it, such as showing a conversation from different angles; since the conversation has the two (or more) actors involved at the same time, the mind of the viewer assumes that they are in the same place, and stitches the two views together to create an impression of a three-dimensional reality in which the individuals are present. A lot of the early special effects shots, especially involving green-screen, or projections, failed to look all that credible because they couldn’t achieve this illusionary immersion, or because the motions didn’t match up. Star Wars and Babylon-5 were the two notable pioneers in solving those problems, using motion-capture and 3D modeling, respectively. Other shows refined the results and processes, but weren’t as ground-breaking.

If you could somehow conjure up a three-dimensional image of the environment around the game table, immersion would be complete, and it doesn’t take a lot of imagination to see how much more engaging and realistic and there the game would be as a result. It’s not going to happen anytime soon, I’m afraid. But there would be a quantum leap improvement over still pictures of a given location.

It’s possible that it will happen eventually, it should be noted – after all, the time was that photo editing was extremely difficult, and you could rely on whatever the camera captured actually being present in some form. Nowadays, anyone can do it, and it’s only a question of the quality of result.

earth coins set sample

Tactile Sense

Perhaps controversially, I am placing the tactile senses at the very top of the tree. Human beings are a very tactile race in some ways, and something that you can touch is immediately more “real” than something you merely see. There are a number of ways that GMs can take advantage of this tactile-based impression of realism.

Tactile Props

It’s quite one thing to offer a picture of a tree-trunk or a sword or whatever, and quite another to offer a tactile prop. This first occurred to me as a result of a “What’s New with Phil & Dixie” by Phil Foglio in The Dragon which talked about various ways of simulating the PC experience using everyday objects – in particular, banging two phone directories together for 30 minutes as a simulation of a minute’s sword-fighting (this memory also played a big part in my article on the Ergonomics of Elves and the sequel on Dwarves).

A piece of driftwood – sanded lightly, if necessary, to prevent splinters. Putting a kitchen knife (one not too sharp – a bread-and-butter knife, for example) in the freezer for 30 minutes. A small ceramic tile. A cheap oil painting. There are all sorts of found objects that can be used to convey a tactile sense of the object being handled. A bowling ball can be used to convey the weight of a large axe. A broom handle can be used as a sword or a spear, just by changing the location of your grip.

It’s just a matter of getting the player to close their eyes, putting the object into their hands and letting them get a feel for the texture, or an impression of the object of some other sort, and then putting a visual in front of them.

Of course, you would only do this when it mattered. But on those occasions when a tactile impression was important, this can establish a connection to the “reality” of the situation that no amount of words would convey as effectively.

Hit Point Counters

There are other forms of association through the tactile sense. We’re used to counting money, for example, so some physical representation of hit points makes the loss have a psychological impact that simply writing numbers on a sheet of paper (or any other means of representing the loss) cannot match. The mere sensation of handling the tactile simulation of the abstract value makes it “feel” more real in the emotional and intellectual sense.

XP counters

For a very long time, I’ve used glass beads – of the sort some CCG players use to indicate active cards – to represent the XP handed out in the course of a session, especially bonuses for good roleplaying or good ideas (or divining the intent of the GM). It doesn’t take much of an extension of the principles from the Hit-point section, in conjunction with the bonus-xp idea, to realize that something coin-like is a great way of making XP more than just a number.

Poker chips in various colors – if necessary from multiple cheap sets – are the perfect way of handling this, because few games will require the handing out of more than 10,000XP (and most considerably less) in a session. So four denominations of chips – thousands, hundreds, tens, and ones – will do the job fairly handily.

kingdom coin sample


And, of course, the ultimate tactile coin-counting experience comes from physically representing a character’s hard-currency wealth in some fashion. Nothing makes the player more aware of their character’s budgeting shortfall than handing them a dozen coins (in different denominations) and then demanding them back, one budgetary item at a time. “Rent… car maintenance… food…” At the same time, there can be real avarice and pleasure when characters receive a windfall.

And that doesn’t even begin to show how useful they can be for dividing up a treasure. “We have to tithe at least 10% to the temple for their Blessings, I get 250 off the top for my potions, and Franklin has to replace the shield that he used to stop the pit-trap mechanism for another 35. We have to pay the porters another 200, and we promised Trevor 10% of the profits for the tip that led us here. Oh, and we need to pay our bar tab, that’s another 73. Whatever’s left, we get to split between us, but Buddy only gets a half-share, so that’s divided two-and-a-half ways.”

Watching the stack get placed in the center of the playing table, and then seeing it dissapear bit-by-bit conveys a realism that you just don’t get any other way.

fantasy coins LLC

Fantasy Coins

That’s the premise behind the products of well-known game prop supplier, Fantasy Coins. I’ve seen their products in use, and drooled, but never had the money to actually buy some for my own use; postage to Australia tends to be fairly prohibitive, and the exchange rate hasn’t been very favorable lately.

As a result, I was quite excited when they advised me of a Kickstarter campaign to fund a further extension of their product line. I’m not the only person, either; they achieved 90% of their funding goals within five days of the campaign commencing, and are presently at 128% funded. The current trend estimates the final total at $119,000 in pledges – but, significantly, that leaves them just $6000 short of the next tier of stretch goals, a gap that is easily bridgeable. It needs 10% more pledges per day remaining the campaign to get there.

The new products and designs look absolutely fabulous, as you can see from the examples scattered here and there throughout this article (some are of existing products for comparison purposes, it should be noted). And, of course, buying through a Kickstarter gives a discount relative to the subsequent retail price, making this the most cost-effective way of buying this extremely useful and versatile game aid.

cthulhu coin sample

Plot Value

But the value goes even beyond the obvious, when you look at the individual products being offered. Consider: the PCs get hired to do a job, and subsequently paid off in Cthulhu Coins and not the usual ones. Without the GM ever saying so, the entire campaign takes a whole new and quite uncomfortable turn for the players, who have to wonder whether or not their characters were just used as the pawns of evil. Whereas they thought the adventure in question was ending, they might suddenly decide to investigate their former employer, launching into a whole new chapter of plotline.

Diversity in coin sets, in other words, enables the differences to be used for plot purposes and for inspiration. This is a great deal, so the time to get on-board is right now – you have (at the time of writing) sixteen days, but that will probably be down to 15 days by the time this is published.

You can check out the kickstarter campaign and wonderful photos of the products developed so far and the art for those still in progress by clicking on this link, and check out their full back catalog at the Fantasy Coins LLC website. And don’t forget to take advantage of their Pledge Calculator, which will make it easy to track what you want to order.

After I agreed to do an article about their fundraising campaign, Fantasy Coin were kind enough to offer me some sample coins. While I feel this offer has had no impact on my review – it still says what I intended it to say, even before this offer – I wanted to make certain that readers knew about this source of possible bias on my part. And it gives me the opportunity to publicly thank them for their generous offer – made, as I said, after I had agreed to review their kickstarter campaign as part of this article.

One thing to watch out for

While most of the campaign is fairly clear, there are one or two sources of potential confusion. The pledges refer to “Add-on sets” and an “add-on menu” but the sets that these refer to aren’t necessarily clear to the casual glance. Some people might think that they get one of everything by backing the campaign, or one set of everything, if they don’t read the pledge descriptions sufficiently clearly. If you take the time to read the content of the whole page, instead of skimming, these sources of potential confusion will become less problematic (Hint: read the text in the graphics, especially the scroll!). I suggest readers check out the campaign early to give them time to ask any questions necessary before the campaign closes – and bear in mind that there have already been 565 comments on the campaign, which may provide the answers you’re looking for.

A multi-sensory approach

No campaign will ever fully exploit every sense throughout. It’s neither practical nor even feasible. However, by selectively targeting different senses, the totality of the whole experience can be dramatically heightened. No prop or stimulus can ever replace good, interesting content, but the appropriate use of props and sensory stimuli can enhance the delivery of your content far beyond anything you can imagine until you try it. The trick is to harness the potential of each sense and target its application selectively, combining images, words, ambiance, scents, flavors, and tactile responses to open windows into the reality that you create for your players.

Comments (1)

Disease and Despair – the healing-resistant nightmare


Another filler article today, I’m afraid. By skipping half the things I was supposed to do over the weekend I finally got my sleep schedule back to something approaching my standards of normality. One of the things skipped was preliminary work on the next part of the New Beginnings series, leaving me with just enough doubt about getting it done in time that I decided to go for something that could be put together in a little less time…

Disease In Battle: A Historical Review

Throughout most of history, disease has been a very scary thing to contemplate. Analysis of the Iliad and other documents of the period show that at that time, arrow wounds carried a mortality rate of 42%, slingshot wounds 67%, spear wounds 80%, and sword wounds 100%. No need to hack away at your foe until he fell – one good hit, then incapacitate and move on. Or knock down for a second-line soldier to administer the coup-de-grace while you – presumably the better combatant – dealt with the next in line.

During the Mexican War (1845–1848) and the Spanish-American War (1898) disease-related deaths outnumbered battle-related deaths by seven to one. Most casualties and deaths in the American Civil War were the result of non-combat-related disease. For every three soldiers killed in battle, five more died of disease.

It’s also worth noting that until far more modern times than those, the most frequent battlefield treatment offered (whether the patient wanted it or not) was amputation, which was thought to at least provide a clean wound for treatment. Napoleon’s surgeon, Dominique-Jean Larrey, could reportedly perform 200 surgeries a day, or one every 7.2 minutes. Hip and shoulder joint amputations apparently took 15 seconds and 11 seconds, respectively. When assessing the casualty rates from Napoleonic-era conflicts, one should bear in mind that this treatment carried a 70% increase in survival rate – divide the number of wounded by 1.7 to get the number who would have died without such treatment and subtract from the historic wounded rate to get the number of additional casualties that would have resulted.

Given the field conditions, even a small scratch from an incidental source could easily become infected, taking men out of combat without their ever having even seen the enemy.

In RPGs, however…

Disease in most RPGs isn’t all that scary. All but a handful are easily cured with a low-level spell in D&D, for example.

In a way, that’s understandable; death by disease is not a very heroic exit, and the fear engendered by disease at a realistic impact level would eliminate the swashbuckling elements of a game. So one can understand why such a “cure” spell was introduced and made so accessible.

This undermines the realism of the game world for the sake of adventuring, and I have no complaint with that in general. However, at no point is there any suggestion of the impact that this would have when applied to anyone more than adventurers. It would restructure an entire society.

Families back then were large, because there were high mortality rates and higher infant mortality rates. People had six or seven children because only one or two might survive to adulthood, completely ignoring the gender-discrimination issues of the time – and that doesn’t take into account children who don’t survive infancy. The true birth rate, with that factored in, might have been as high as ten on average.

That’s a lot of mouths to feed, sapping income and prosperity from the life of the couple. It produces drastic overcrowding and consequently raises the rate of disease by aiding its spread. It’s easy to see, under such conditions, how the Black Death could be so widespread and devastating.

The Black Death Shows The Way

And yet, the Black Death had a transformative effect on society (though some might suggest that it merely accelerated an already-existing trend). By wiping out so much of the population – 30-60% of the European Population of the time according to Wikipedia – it made manpower so scarce that people could demand the freedom to move from place to place practicing a specialty, rather than being tied to a single block of land that wasn’t even theirs in most cases. People could afford the time to specialize, and grow skilled, and become a professional middle class. So significant were the consequences that Wikipedia has a separate article on the subject.

Imagine how different things would have been if the local parish Priest were able to cure one or two people every day, and the population knew it. Death becomes the result of not being able to reach a healer in time. Birth rates would never have reached the levels that were historically recorded in our world; the average of the modern day, 2.5 children, would have been far more likely. That means that there would not have been enough manpower to maintain the feudal system of government, exactly as was the case following the black death; and that freemen and a professional middle-class would be an economically-significant factor, if not a dominant one.

Note that the trend towards professionalism has produced the modern army, which considers itself a professional force, well-trained and well-equipped – though the conscript army remained a factor until after the Vietnam War, so some additional “kick” would be required to produce such a shift in military thinking. In our world, it was the combination of economic downsizing and the unpopularity of the military as a profession following the Vietnam conflict; in an RPG game world, I would suggest that the presence of adventurers who could kick the tails of an entire squad of less-qualified individuals, and the presence of outlandish monsters that frequently required special training and tactics that would force this same transition to occur.

That means that the game environment of the typical D&D/Pathfinder game would be a curious blend of the feudal, the reformation and the age of steam, and the 1980s. It only takes a few key breakthroughs in mechanical engineering by this new professional class to produce Steampunk!

Putting The Fear Back Into Disease

In 2007 or 2008 – some three-hundred-plus issues of Roleplaying Tips ago – I offered Johnn an article, “Putting The Fear Back Into Disease” which sought to redress the balance, to put some fear of disease back into the system without undermining things to such an extent that adventurers would be reduced to timidity. While dying from disease is not all that heroic, overcoming the odds despite a disease is even more heroic. I also wanted to give GMs the ability to control the extent to which a professional middle-class could rewrite the social landscape, so that the traditional Heroic Fantasy environment continued to make sense.

I’m not going to recapitulate that article here – you can read it in the Roleplaying Tips archives through the link above. But I was thinking about it this morning, and came up with a chain of speculation that makes for interesting reading. Specifically, what would happen in a game if a Healing Resistant Disease were to arise?

If the principles of my article were in place within a campaign, the effects would be relatively minimal – a plague scare along the lines of the social practices instituted during the Black Death (hence my links to those articles on Wikipedia). This would be a population used to the notion that not every priest could solve every problem, so it would be bad, but not cataclysmic.

Things would not be so rosy in a game world without such a balancing element…

The Healing-Resistant Disease

The natural first assumption would be that the resulting plague was the work of some inimical force – a Devil or Demon or Dark God – whose influence the local priest was unable to overcome. It would also be assumed that this was strictly a local problem, so the township would be sealed and urgent messages sent to higher up the the Theological Power Structure. Meanwhile a witch-hunt – both literal and figurative – would commence in the affected towns.

The results would be akin to the fear – and the manifestations of that fear – that gripped the township of Salem, New England, in the 17th century (Salem Witch Trials). Anyone who was newly-arrived would be suspect. Anyone who had performed acts that the local clergy held to be unsavory would be suspect. Allegations would be made by members of the public against neighbors who they didn’t like or mistrusted. Populations would turn to adventurers – both current and retired – to root out the cause.

At first, people would isolate themselves from outside contact as much as possible. Anyone suspected of harboring the disease would be shunned. Con men would begin selling miracle cures and preventatives – but woe betide any that didn’t got caught when their “cures” failed.

At that center of higher religious authority, a disturbing pattern would begin to emerge, one that would quickly show that this was not a local problem, that it was more widespread. Several townships were affected, and there might be several regions affected, though geographically separated. An urgent mission would be sent to one or more of the affected townships to bring stronger theological “muscle” to bear. In some cases, this might even be successful; eventually, though, one of these higher-level clerics would fall ill of the disease, and public panic would reach a whole new level.

Almost-forgotten superstitions and prejudices of all kinds would make a resurgence. Social Order would begin to collapse as people turned into lynch mobs and pitched battles erupted in the streets. Anyone suspected of harboring the disease would now be more than shunned – their homes would be burned while armed men prevented anyone from leaving, in a desperate attempt to quell the disease.

In the meantime, there would be cases where people had fled through whatever quarantine was in place, and some of those would spread the disease to new population centers.

From Local to Regional

It would probably be around this time that the first reports of the plague would reach the highest levels of civil authority. The most likely route by which this news would travel would be a series of messages from the mid-level theological authorities, who would report to the heads of their Churches or High Temples or whatever the equivalent is in this particular game world. The increasing urgency of these reports would mean that the first traveled slowly through channels, with each subsequent one cutting more and more quickly through the layers of bureaucracy, in effect “catching up” with the earlier messages.

The first would describe a regional problem, and the suspected supernatural origins, and report the dispatch of a higher-level cleric to investigate. The second, rather more urgent, would follow close on the heels of the first, reporting that the problem was even more widespread than first thought. A third would report confirmation that the disease was supernatural in nature and/or origin, and the fourth that the local authorities were losing control of the situation. A fifth, from an entirely separate region, would mirror the first, as the early cases of the second wave were reported.

All this would land on the desk of whoever was the ultimate social authority in one bombshell. What happens next depends on the personality and especially the decisiveness of that authority. The correct action is a series of edicts that minimize travel, turn out the army to blockade infected regions, control the passage of essential supplies, etc, but these edicts will either be draconian in nature or almost-certainly ineffective (although it depicts a plague in slightly more-advanced stage, and lacks the impact of healing magic, several chapters of Demon Lord Of Karanda, the third volume of The Mallorean by David Eddings (available from this link shows the sort of ruthless decision-making needed – and spells out the consequences of not doing so with only slight exaggeration; the character doing the spelling-out is trying to persuade the authority in question, after all! The fourth volume, Sorceress Of Darshiva, describes the policies that actually succeed in bringing the spread of the plague under control, and so is also worth reading).

Let’s assume decisiveness, because anything less is a total disaster. In fact, a failure to respond adequately to the crisis is more than enough reason for anyone who wants to supplant the current rule with their won to advance their plans, potentially muddying the waters with a civil war on top of everything else. So let’s not go down that particular road.

Inevitably, the army on blockade duty will catch the disease, at least at some point. More importantly, rumors will be swirling by this time, and desertion will be rife. The enforcement of discipline will be a major secondary problem, and the harsh lessons necessary will be quite enough to contaminate the ruler’s reputation for many years to come, no matter how generous, fair, likable, just, and even-handed his reputation may have been before the crisis – a tertiary problem. If there were no groups plotting to overthrow the throne before the crisis, there will be many such groups for decades afterwards.

The results are clearly a nation in crisis. Anyone who thinks that the prejudices and paranoia unleashed will simply fade away once the immediate problem is resolved is peddling moonbeams; the society will take quite a long time to heal, and it won’t happen without strenuous effort by appropriate groups. Region-by-region, the subjects of superstition and prejudice will be different, and frequently fueled by proximity. A century or more of social progress can be wiped away in weeks, and not be recovered for decades or even generations.

A scary premise, no? But, if you want to make things really scary, have one of the Gods come down with the Plague…

Campaign Integration

There are two ways that this premise can be integrated into the campaign – either on top of whatever the PCs are going to be doing anyway, as an additional handicap, or as a stand-alone problem for them to solve, possibly interrupting or disrupting whatever they were doing.

I would suggest that the key to making this decision lies in the true origins of the disease. If the PCs enemy can be reasonably attributed as the cause, and may well therefore be in possession of a cure, then it becomes just an escalation in the existing conflict between them. If the enemy is not plausibly the cause, or you don’t want him/her/it/them to be the cause for whatever reason (including consistency of characterization), the plotline is one to be inserted. This gives you an opportunity to show a completely different side of that enemy – to quote a Klingon proverb from the (original series) Star Trek episode “Day Of The Dove”, “Only a fool fights in a burning house”. There are no enemies so evil as those who set aside their animosity and work with someone in common cause – only to resume exactly where they left off when the crisis is over, because this shows that they have a choice in their morality and have deliberately chosen the “Dark Side”.

Once you know the origin of the disease, you can decide what the PCs are going to be able to do about it. Even if the disease is not unnatural, but is simply something that’s been dormant for centuries – perhaps a leftover from a war long ago – there has to be something. Perhaps a specially-modified cure spell that only acts on this disease can be dug up from somewhere, if nothing else.

With both the background of the plot and the end of the plot worked out, it remains only to determine (a) where the PCs first become aware of the situation, (b) how bad it is at that time, (c) how they are going to learn of the path to a solution, and (d) what is going to oppose them – because there will be opportunists out there who will do so!

For me, the critical questions are (c) and (d). How long is it likely to take for the PCs to find out about a potential solution, overcome whatever opposition they have to face (bearing in mind that movement may be restricted), obtain and distribute the cure? Then work backwards from the point of total collapse into anarchy, which is what happens when the army starts to desert to determine the situation when the PCs have to drop everything and focus on the emergency. That gives you a worst-case answer to (b) (though you can have things happening in the background before then, if you want, of which the PCs might be aware), and that in turn (in conjunction with what the PCs currently plan to be doing) gives you the answer to (a).

The other thing that you have to do is determine the profile of the disease. How contagious? What are the symptoms? How long before symptoms does a victim become contagious? How long after symptoms show does death usually occur, and in what percentage of the infected? Are bodies contagious after death? How is the disease spread? How long does the pathogen remain viable once removed from a suitable environment? Is Zoonosis possible – the spread from animals to humans? Can it also travel in the other direction? And, finally, how long can the disease remain dormant, in the soil or whatever?

Some of these answers are vital to understanding how the disease will spread, and what the timescales are. The longer the contagious phase before overt symptoms show, the more widely-spread the disease will be. The rate of contagion (how easy it is to catch the disease) indicates what percentage of the exposed population will come down with it. If both are high, the disease can be extremely widespread. One of the saving graces of AIDS was that the HIV virus fares very poorly once exposed to the environment; that is why it can only be spread by contact with an infected blood supply or other bodily fluid, which maintains that environment long enough for the disease to be transmitted.

The faster death occurs, the more quickly the disease will die out naturally. The most dangerous are those that permit a carrier to remain mobile for a long time, spreading the disease. The most successful diseases, and the ones that – in the long run – have killed the most people, are not the spectacular ones like the Black Death, or Ebola, but ones like Influenza. While there can be, and have been, massive lethal outbreaks of the latter (epidemics) they usually only kill a small percentage of the population at a time – year after year after year.

Each of the profile questions has a significant impact on the course of the disease, on how big the emergency will be, how quickly it will develop into a crisis, and how far it will spread. So think about the answers carefully, and craft them to create the disaster that you want to occur.

There is one final reference that I should point readers toward, in terms of this subject. Moreta: Dragonlady of Pern by Anne McCaffrey tells the story of a deadly plague that spreads across the planet, and of the desperate attempts to find a cure in time. While it’s not strictly necessary, it would probably help if the reader had read some of the other books in the Pern series, or at least consulted this Wikipedia page (and the pages it links to) to get the basic foundations.

A brief word on Heal

When I first started writing this, I thought that it might be necessary for the disease to resist “Heal” as well as “Cure Disease”. Further reflection has shown that it is not necessarily so; there are only going to be so many people who can cast it, and they can only cast it a small number of times a day, and the sheer logistics of bringing patient and healer together mean that many of those limited opportunities would be wasted, unless the disease was so widespread that the available treatments simply couldn’t keep up.

But this would bring about its own social disruptions. Consider: let’s say that ten people a day can be cured in this way, but 100 become infected. Who chooses the ten? and what do the other 90 think about those choices? And the people who don’t have it yet but who are being put at risk by the 90? And the friends and family of the 90? The slightest hint of favoritism or corruption and the temples – and hence, the “Heal” spells – would go up in smoke, destroyed by angry mobs. And there would be plenty of such hints, as those with influence and wealth seek to prioritize themselves, and those with power seek to justify favored treatment. Even if they are refused, there are sure to be those who will claim the healing was simply done in secret.

So, even if “Heal” does cure the plague, the results would be worse than if it did not!

Leave a Comment

A Legacy Of War: The Founding Of National Identities

Dawn Service, Anzac Day

“Dawn service gnangarra 01″ – Photograph by Gnangarra. Licensed under CC BY 2.5 au via Wikimedia Commons, click the image to view license. Frame Effect added by Mike.

A History Lesson: The ANZACs

This Saturday marks the 100th anniversary of a seminal date in Australian History. April 25, 1915 was the day the Gallipoli campaign began, part of World War I, “The War to end All Wars”. Intended to drive the Ottoman Empire out of the First World War with a single bold move, it degenerated into an eight-month trench warfare stalemate.

Allied Casualties included 21,255 from the United Kingdom, an estimated 10,000 dead soldiers from France, 8,709 from Australia, 2,721 from New Zealand, and 1,358 from British India. Those Australian and New Zealand numbers might not seem all that high, but as a percentage of the populations they were massive.

Great Britain at the time had a population of 40 million, France slightly more, British India more than 315 million. Australia’s casualties were only 41% of the UK total, but the UK’s population was eight times ours; New Zealand’s losses were only 13% of those of the UK but they had only 1 twenty-third or twenty-fourth of the population. Relative to our populations, Australian casualties were almost 33 times the British rate and New Zealand’s, over 30 times as high.

But, while those figures may help to explain why the date was chosen for our national remembrances – the public holidays on which Aussies and Kiwis commemorate all those members of our respective militaries who “served and died in all wars, conflicts, and peacekeeping operations” and “the contribution and suffering” of those who have served – they don’t explain why this particular date became so significant within the cultural zeitgeist.

That happened within days of the landings at Gallipoli. Prior to that time, both countries were Dominions of the British Empire, and very much saw ourselves as being British. This was the moment at which we started to think of ourselves as being Australian and New Zealand, with our own national identity and character. Some of that character was forged in the trenches, and relayed home by newspaper accounts; more was forged there and relayed home by the letters of those serving; and still more was forged by the common experience of those who were still at home, but who had friends and family in service.

The seeds had been planted, according to some, in the Second Boar War, while others might point to the first defeat of a sporting team from the Home Country by Australia in 1882, which led to a British Newspaper, The Sporting Times, running an obituary which announced the death of English Cricket, and that the ‘body’ would be cremated and the ashes taken to Australia. Before the 1882-83 series began, the English Captain had vowed to “regain those ashes”, and the phrase led the British media to dub the tour “the quest to regain the Ashes”. It only remained to solemnize the ongoing rivalry in the form of a symbolic representation of “The Ashes” for the name to become a permanent association of the sporting rivalry between the two – and the sporting heritage shared by both. Some days, I personally think one, and on other days, the other.

Either way, the landings at what is now known as Anzac Cove on April 25 welded together many aspects of the general Australian character such as mateship, initiative, ingenuity, larrikinism, resilience, determination, and egalitarianism into a common culture.

In fact, the ANZACs (Australia & New Zealand Army Corps) fought with such gallantry and good spirits that there arose in their enemies of the day and their leadership a great respect. Despite parity in armament and an attacking posture, those 44,000 Allied lives were lost, and 97,000 wounded, at the cost of an estimated 86,500 Turkish casualties. After the war, Kemal Atatürk, the Turkish General in Command at Gallipoli wrote:

“Those heroes that shed their blood, And lost their lives,
You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country.
Therefore rest in peace.

There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side, Here in this country of ours.

You, the mothers, Who sent their sons from far away countries,
Wipe away your tears, Your sons are now lying in our bosom, and are in peace.

After having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well.”

These words have been inscribed in memorials in all three countries – Australia, New Zealand, and Turkey.

The war is full of stories of desperation, good humor, and bravery on both sides of the battlefield (as most wars are, if you count Gallows humor), but most of all, of mutual respect between the ANZAC troops and the Turks, and behavior that both sides can respect and honor.

To Australians and New Zealanders, this was the conflict that defined us in many respects, in the eyes not only of ourselves, but of other nations.

Other conflicts have had the same effect on other nations. While the seeds of their national character were laid down in the American War Of Independence, it can be argued that the defining moment in which those seeds blossomed was in the Civil War. This conflict wasn’t directly about slavery, though some historians might argue otherwise; it was a clash of two opposing interpretations, two ideologies with a common foundation. It was about economics and politics and society in a broader sense; The Anti-Slavery aspect was just one manifestation of these differences.

It’s not the only way that a national identity can emerge, but it’s a reasonably common one, simply because the first thing that any emerging nation has to do in a lot of cases is establish its independence – against the will of whoever claimed the territory previously.

The RPG Relevance

In some measure, these thoughts came to mind as an outgrowth of the material concerning the societies of races in an RPG campaign that I completed and posted on Monday (New Beginnings: Phase 7: Skeleton), and that’s why this is a subject of importance to players and GMs.

Every sentient race should have at least one event per society that defines them as a culture. It might not be a war, but it might be. Whatever it is, it should have multiple effects on the society. There should be folk sayings that have their origins in wartime events. There should be heroes, and sometimes there need to be villains. There needs to be tales of triumph and stories of tragedy and heartbreak, and yes, a few scary ones thrown into the mix. There will be statues, and remembrances, and memorials. Some places will have their names changed to reflect events, other places will give name to the event such that the place-name itself becomes an iconic representation of the event. The popularity of certain names will rise and others fall. Cuisines and spending patterns can change. The list is endless.

But most of all, national characterizations can emerge, and those in turn can affect everything else about that culture, and should have that effect in almost every case.

Traps, Tips, and Tricks

One of the hardest aspects of doing this as a GM or as a writer is making the character that emerges consistent with the “story of the war”. It is very easy for the correspondence between them to seem forced and artificial.

This is often because the wartime incidents that are supposed to reflect the national identity that the GM wants to ascribe to the post-war population focus entirely on just one aspect of the overall character. People aren’t like that; they have a touch of everything about them. That means all aspects of the national character, and aspects of the former national character that the new traits are to replace. Certainly, one trait can be dominant, or can make the difference, but ideally, you want all the incidents to reflect the overall personality profile with cumulative effect – like the cricketer who caught and threw back enemy hand-grenades for twelve hours in one ANZAC trench, and who represents several of the qualities that are now associated with the “ideal” of the typical Aussie Character.

It can be useful to remember that there are few individuals on the battlefield; instead, each person will have several others nearby, who can serve as mouthpieces for other aspects of the iconic persona that you want to portray.

Another useful tip to remember is that there will be some romanticization of events afterwards, the better to fit the legend. If something feels a little forced, or feels like it’s “too good a fit” (and hence seems artificial), try telling the story to someone else, then getting them to repeat it back to you while you take notes. Use their version and modify it to include any aspects of the persona to be projected that the story overlooks. Repeat (with different people) as often as necessary. With some practice, you can reach the point where you can be your own audience for such revision.

Probably the biggest mistake that GMs make when they attempt this is obvious predetermination. “This is the story of how Green became the color of death” – deciding the personality trait to be infused and writing a story or plot outline for that specific purpose. I generally find that I have much better results if I decide the overall personality that I want to display, compare that with the personality profile that existed previously, and construct an incident in which the two produce differences in the outcome. In other words, instead of highlighting one particular element of the “new” personality, I focus on highlighting the distinctiveness relative to expectations, and the rest more or less takes care of itself.

Creating more than one representative incident in this way and then cherry-picking amongst them to choose those which highlight a particular aspect of the “new” personality creates “historical anecdotes” that seem natural and still convey the desired message. What’s more, it enables specific targeting of the emergent personality profile desired because it focuses attention on the things that make that profile distinctive.

In Remembrance

And every time you use this technique, I hope that you spare an idle moment to remember the servicemen and women of your nation who have served their countries, just as I think of the ANZACs and their successors in the Australian Military at such times. You might not agree with everything or anything that they have done – some don’t – but every recruit joined up to serve in the hopes of bringing about a better tomorrow (even those for whom service was involuntary – that just transposes someone else’s vision of “better” into the picture). Respect the intent, even if you don’t agree with the execution, purpose, politics, or tactics.

Leave a Comment

New Beginnings: Phase 7: Skeleton

new beginnings 08

After the rain, growth is spectacular.

It’s not easy making a completely fresh start. This series examines the process of creating a new campaign in detail. So far, we have a campaign plan and a development plan for the game world along with a schedule for that development. We’re now dotting i’s and crossing t’s and building up the foundations of the game world before getting it ready for the first session of play.

You can view a game world from many different perspectives. There’s the Geographic perspective – where things are, and why, and even what effect that has had. There’s the historical perspective – what happened, and when, and why. There’s the player briefing perspective, in which you tell players what they need to know in order to play characters that live in and derive from that game world. There’s the plot perspective, in which everything exists for a reason, and that reason is that it forms the foundations of fun storyline by presenting circumstances which will challenge the PCs and enable them to make a difference. And there’s the metagame structural perspective, in which key concepts unfold ramifications within all of the other perspectives.

Many GMs get by just fine without considering most of these. They put an initial situation in place in terms of the society, slap a quick and dirty map together, and just get on with the game, adding to their game world with each adventure and each time the players stick their character’s noses into a particular dusty corner.

But the really good GMs (usually) go much further than that, and the mission of Campaign Mastery is to help GMs elevate their games to an exceptional standard. It behooves me, therefore, to assume that this extended work is absolutely essential to running a good campaign, and not optional at all. And so we find ourselves looking to build a skeleton view of the campaign world that is entirely distinct from the plot skeleton that forms its spine – because the players won’t get to see the full shape of that spine until the end of the Campaign, if then, and they need something to sink their teeth into before die roll one of the campaign.

A status check

Here’s what we’ve built up so far:

  • A Campaign Plan that outlines the external events that are going to shape the PCs lives during the course of the campaign
  • A Game World File that outlines the basics of the campaign world and which represents what the PCs all “know” (contents may be Old Wife’s Tales)
  • A GMs World File that extends those outlines and indicates the truth, as it will emerge in the course of the campaign, and indicates in which adventure each such revelation is due to occur
  • A sandboxed development plan that schedules development of parts of the Game World according to the just-in-time principle, adjusted to accommodate the Real World
  • Player Briefing Notes that outline how the Game World differs from the “standard model” and why the inhabitants think the world is the way it is. These are organized for race-by-race and archetype-by-archetype delivery, usually by putting them in separate documents.
  • GMs Briefing Notes that contains corrected/expanded versions of the Player Briefing Notes. These are usually all collected into a single document for easy cross-reference, but don’t have to be.
  • A House Rules file that currently may contain no more than an indication of the need for a particular house rule, may contain draft House Rules, or (most probably) a blend of both.

That seems like an awful lot of material, but if you were to examine an actual example (I haven’t had time to work one up, but there was the equivalent of one offered in bits and pieces through the first five parts of my Inventing and Reinventing Races in DnD / On The Origins Of Orcs series), you would find that they are surprisingly empty.

To illustrate that, let me point the reader to my On Alien Languages series. This not only describes the Languages within my Shards Of Divinity campaign, their relationship to each other, and the Rules Structure that I created to go with them, each part also contains a writeup of one of the societies within that campaign. These write-ups were one or two paragraphs long in my Player’s Briefing Notes and a supplemental paragraph or two in my GM’s Briefing Notes. Easily 95% of the material provided on each society to readers of Campaign Mastery was completely original work, expanding greatly on what was known about many of them. In some cases, parts of this additional material had come out in the course of play, but had never been assembled in coherent and complete form before.

Two-to-four paragraphs became eight pages plus – substantially more in some cases. So there’s lots more work to do.

The Process

The process is fairly straightforward, thankfully. Under a number of headings, I will raise a subject about which you need to say something – blank spaces for you to fill. All you have to do is complete one and move on to the next.

Ah, if only it were that simple. There are a couple of wrinkles to take into account.

  • Each time you make an entry that pertains to another archetype or race, you have to make corresponding entries in the relevant documents for that archetype or race.
  • There are some entries that require you to scrutinize and compare an archetype or race with each of the others, something that is only practical if all entries have been brought up to the same level of completion. So you can’t deal with one Archetype or Race completely in isolation. I’ve broken the topics into broad sections, and I suggest working on no more than one or two sections at a time – then moving on to the next Archetype or Race and doing those same sections for that group. When you reach the end, go back to the first Archetype or Race and do the next section or two.
The Scope Of Work

There’s an awful lot to get through, so try to limit yourself to one line of text per subject. At most, one paragraph per subject. Keep it brief, and that will keep it flexible.

What Goes Where

The raw facts go into the Players’ Briefing documents – you started compiling one for each archetype and each race last time out. Explanations can go into either the player’s briefing or the GMs equivalent, depending on whether or not the explanation is known to the members of that archetype or race. Any supplementary material goes into the GMs Briefing documents, especially how this is going to impact on subjects that haven’t been considered yet. Again, try to limit yourself to one or two lines per entry, or you’ll be at it forever. You will have an opportunity, once the bare bones have been sketched in, to flesh out these notes.

Deviations From The Source

Don’t be afraid to deviate from the official source material. It’s far better to do so and maintain an internal consistency than it is to follow the source material slavishly and try to fit your own ideas around it. The key words in that statement are “maintain an internal consistency” – above all else, this has to be your primary goal. Any changes you make must be reflected elsewhere when appropriate.

If an archetype or race is broadly characterized as Arrogant and Authoritarian, don’t have the leaders selected by democratic principles (unless you think of a way to twist the application of those principles to suit, of course). Think carefully about the impact of everything you write.

If you give a race an additional sense, or a variation on a sense, consider how that alters their world-view, and how (in turn) that altered world-view affects the rest of the society of that race.

Quotations From The Source

A lot of the time, you will simply be supplementing “the official word” and not rewriting it. It can be very tempting to simply give an appropriate reference eg “see PHB p35″. Don’t Do It.

If you can find a version of the source material that permits copy-and-paste, use it. If you can’t, or it screws up your formatting (which happens sometimes), synopsize it. This is because trying to cross-reference or edit something at a later point becomes much harder when you have to remember what is written on “PHB p35″; there’s going to be a lot of material on that page, and you have to know to what you are specifically referring. More, neither you nor your players will want to open one document that simply tells you to open another – with neither of them telling the whole story. As much as possible, your player briefings should be a one-stop shop, and you certainly want your own notes to be as quick to access and digest as possible.

Archetypes (Careers/Professions)

So, let’s get into specifics. I’ll start with Archetypes, because they are often the simplest.

Profession Vs Calling

Decision number one is whether or not the Archetype represents a Profession, a Calling, or both.

A Profession implies an internal structure with its own Society, Rules, and Authority. It also tends to indicate a formal educational process of qualification and some sort of professional standards. A Calling means that anyone can pick it up. The combination usually means that the Archetype is open to anyone, but that there is a Hierarchy of some sort that attempts to control and dominate the adherents and takes a dim view of independent operators, for example a Thief’s Guild.

The D&D/Pathfinder “Fighter” class, for example, might be open to anyone, or it might involve formal military training. Or there could be a combination – anyone can take it up, but there are “professional bodies” who are selective in their membership and who can offer advantages to those the select to join.

Paladins are usually treated as being very elitist and formally structured, ie a Profession. Clerics are usually assumed to have a rigid Hierarchy, making them a Religious Order – but are often bound to take anyone who feels the Calling, or claims to. Perhaps there are “Lay Clerics” as well as “Ordained Clerics” in your world; what’s the difference?

Note that advantages should never come without a commensurate price, and mere qualification restrictions are not enough of a price-tag.

Connect Archetypes to Nexii

When developing the campaign plan, three Nexii were chosen. These are plots that have no real purpose other than to give the game impetus at key points and focus the player’s attention where the GM wants it, as opposed to where the best place is for it to be in terms of the broader campaign.

The Primary Nexus is what the players think is going on when the campaign first begins. The Secondary Nexus operates to keep action happening in a period where both sides of whatever conflict the PCs are in the middle of are busy maneuvering for position or tactical advantage in the mid-campaign and is more about direct action and straightforward conflict. The Tertiary Nexus provides a contrasting emotional tone in the late campaign when things are getting grim and serious. Refer “Choose Three Nexii” in Phase 4: Development for more information.

It’s great to implant the seeds of these Nexii into the Player Briefings. This is especially true of the Primary Nexus. Some of these clues should manifest within the Archetypes, others within the Races. In the case of the Primary Nexus, what are the archetypes concerned with at the moment? Is there are conspiracy against Mages? Are the Legions (Fighters) being torn apart by internal dissent? Is corruption in the Church rife, leading to a crackdown?

For the Secondary and Tertiary nexii, you need to be a little more oblique. Build triggers into your races and archetypes so that their reactions when you drop the starter’s flag will create the Nexus, or create the significance that makes the Nexus important enough that the players will care about it.

Connect Archetypes to Themes

Your campaign themes should always be reflected in the archetypes in some way, usually by exemplifying that theme in one respect or another. For example, if a theme is “There is no success without struggle”, then each archetype should encompass both a struggle of some sort that earns the rewards of progress within the archetype.

Some are trickier than others. “Bittersweet Victories” is almost identical in meaning to “Every Success has a price”, but the latter is far more easily integrated that the first. That’s because the first concerns an emotional state, while the second is more generic. Nevertheless, through the usage of graduation ceremonies and other traditions, it is possible to build such emotional content into archetypes; for example, if there are only a limited number of openings within the archetype (fits Paladins, Wizards, Clerics, and Elite Fighters, for example,) and the tradition is that the winner apologize to and encourage those who didn’t make it? Or perhaps there can be only one living member per family, no matter how promising others might be?

Comparative Archetypes and Racial Exceptions

Does a given archetype mean the same thing to all the races? Is a given archetype available to all races? Or are there differences in social context?

Is an Elvish Barbarian something completely distinct from a Human Barbarian, for example? Do the Elves of your campaign even Have Barbarians? You could argue, based on The Hobbit (the original story, I haven’t seen the second movie yet) that the Forest Elves are Barbarians, simpler and more elemental than the inhabitants of Rivendell or the other Elves seen in the Lord Of The Rings. They are petty, arrogant, and spend their time carousing and feasting – sounds relatively “barbarian” to me! Others would disagree, and even point out that Legolas comes from the Forest Elves – and he’s both civilized and poetically well-versed! So you could make the argument either way. A convenient way out of the conundrum is to say “yes, but” the meaning of “barbarian” isn’t quite the same!

It involves quite a bit of work, but I often find it rewarding to “custom-fit” the flavor text of each archetype for each of the major races. I’m not suggesting that you go that far, but a step in that direction is very helpful, both in terms of distinguishing between the races and in making the archetypes more than stats and abilities.

Authority Structures

What is the authority structure of the archetype? How is it structured? Are there rules?

Let’s take Barbarians again, just for the sake of example. It might be that they have no formal authority structure, but when two Barbarians face each other for the first time, they face off against each other in some mutually-accepted test of dominance (arm-wrestling is a good one). The loser, and those who look to him as a superior/leader, are not permitted to operate at cross-purposes with the winner, and may be recruited to bolster his forces if he needs them for some specific task. Or it may be that they have to perform one service for the superior and are then free to go their own way. With groups, the Leaders might have to go at it, or it might be that Champions can be used.

Alternatively, since intelligence tends to be the biggest shortcoming of Barbarians in general, you could state that it is the most highly-prized ability amongst them as a social class and that the leaders must engage in a game of riddles – the first to get one posed by the other side right is adjudged the superior.

Both Elves and Humans are likely to have Wizards, with formal social structures – but probably not the same hierarchy, possibly not even the same criterion for leadership.

With Paladins, it might be ranking within the Nobility if you want them to be more like Chivalric Knights, or they might have a spell or minor ability (on top of those in the book) that lets them sense and compare “Purity Of Purpose” – with the most zealous (most fanatical?) assumed to have the authority to command the lesser. Or it might be that this is only the case within the Paladins who look to a particular Deity, and that it is the Divine Ranking of their Patrons that dictate who can give orders to whom outside of these Orders.

Archetype Relations

These come in two flavors: internal and external.


Internal relations deal with splits in a hierarchy or authority. “Rogue factions” are always fun to have running around, if not overused. Sometimes these rogue factions will represent the right path, sometimes they may be extremists and counter-productive to the archetype in general. Sometimes both. The one certainty is that any PC of this archetype will have either chosen a side, or will be called upon to do so at some point in the game!


External relations deal with the (general) relations between one hierarchy and another. Paladins and Thieves don’t usually work well together – there can be exceptions, of course. How do Clerics feel about Wizards? About Druids?

In a martial society, success as a Fighter may be the key to Nobility – it often was, in Feudal Society – and that might mandate that Fighters don’t like Clerics, because Clerics are prone to opposing the will of the Noble Fighters in response to some alleged “Higher Authority”. But that in turn applies that the Gods rarely make a show of their presence, and despite surface trappings of religion, the populace has only the Cleric’s Word as to the source of their powers. It might be that Clerics and Wizards are exactly the same save for having different spell lists, spell foci, and the like, and that the “higher authority” is all in the Clerics’ collective imaginations. Or the Gods might be demonstrably real, and the Theologians have a crusade against Wizards because the latter are without “Moral Compass” in the use of their Gods-given Gifts.

You have to assume that every Archetype will bump shoulders with every other one at some point, and – at the very least – will form opinions about them.

Professional Fees

Is it appropriate for the Cleric to charge for casting his Healing Spells? Can the Paladin demand recompense for his services? Even if they have to subsequently tithe most of what they accrue to their respective organizations?

It may well be one rule for the Party and another for the Public. And you can argue which way things should go either way: Charging the party is entirely reasonable if there is assumed to be a professionally-contracted relationship between party members, but the dispensing of services to the public is a gift of those services by the individual doing so. Conversely, charging the public but not the party is reasonable if the Party is more of an alliance for the purpose of mutual success, permitting the character to waive his fees-for-service.

Professional Courtesies

Are there professional courtesies that have to be exchanged when entering a new territory? There often are such in the case of a widespread Thief’s Guild, for example. Clerics may be required to attend daily services at an appropriate chapel, shrine, or temple if there is one within reach, no matter what – or may simply be required to inform the head of the local theological establishment of his presence. That local may or may not have authority over the actions of the Cleric whilst the latter is in his jurisdiction – and may be held responsible by HIS superiors.

Professional Courtesies may be social in nature, customary, or may be strictly regulated, or all sorts of options in between these two extremes. Wizards in a strange territory may be forbidden from accepting apprentices without the approval of the local Guild representative, for example, but might be free to do what they want, otherwise.

It’s worth pointing out that the Church Knights in David Eddings’ trilogy The Eleniumand its sequel, The Tamuli are essentially Paladins who are subordinate to the clerical hierarchy, even above their own leadership. This is a useful point to make because it subordinates one Archetype to another.

In addition to determining what the social niceties are, the GM needs to determine the penalties for breaches, and what sort of process may be involved in reaching judgment.

Key Figures

Each Archetype will have its own authority figures, both contemporary and historical, and these will have reputations and personalities (possibly fictionalized!). Every member of a given archetype can be expected to know who these people are. They might never figure directly into the campaign, but they will almost certainly be referred to on occasion – so give them a name and a public reputation now for future reference, and put them at the end of the document to make them easy to find.


That ends the archetype phase of building the world skeleton. Move on to the next archetype, and – when you’ve finished them all – its time to think about Races and Societies.

The Rarity Sequence

With archetypes, it doesn’t matter what order you do them in. That is not the case when it comes to races, as the sequence itself can be used to make the task easier. This requires a preliminary step: estimating the total population of each race within the bounds of the part of the campaign world that the players are expected to reach.

All done? Now, put it aside – it’s almost certainly wrong. Go off and read Medieval Demographics Made Easy by S. John Ross.

I tend to have a central realm that is heavily populated, a fringe that is far less populated, isolated pockets of intermediate density within that Fringe, mainly clustered along trade routes and navigable waterways, a very lightly populated outer fringe, and a largely unpopulated wilderness – but that suits my game, in which there are more monsters and they are more dangerous to any form of settled populace. So I exaggerate the differences in population density.

I then modify these results for differences in habitation patterns. Most Elven societies that I’ve seen don’t farm as intensively as Humans – not even close – so I will arbitrarily select a value for them. Dwarves tend to be confined into small communities of high population density – and because they operate by volume and not surface area, densities can reach far higher numbers than those of human settlements.

If you take the square root of the human equivalent and then cube it to get the Dwarven population density, you will get a rough idea of how significant the volume factor is. Taking 100 as an example: Square root of 100 is ten; ten cubed is 10 x 10 x 10, or 1000 citizens per cubic mile.

The same calculation works for determining the population of a community of the same physical size; let’s say a village of 250 people. Square root of 250 is 15.811; and 15.811 x 15.811 x 15.811 is 3953, near enough. But these “villages” are probably scattered far more distantly from each other. For a geographically much smaller area, say a mountain range, it’s nevertheless quite easy for a Dwarven Kingdom to have ten times the population one would expect.

The alternative is to say that the villages are physically much smaller, and hold some intermediate number of people: 800, for example. Take the cube root of the value and square it, then divide by the “human” population density to get the physical size of the community: cube root of 800 is 9.28; square of 9.28 is about 86; population density of 100 per square mile gives 0.86 square miles. Area of a circle is Pi-R-squared, so 0.86 square miles is roughly 0.523 miles radius. Call it half a mile, so the whole settlement is about a mile across – using these assumptions! Notice that this gives a higher value for effective population density than 1000 per cubic mile – 0.86 miles radius gives 0.6 cubic miles volume, and 800 people in that volume is 1,335 people per cubic mile.

It’s also a reasonable assumption that a uniformly spherical settlement is unlikely to the point of near-impossibility. Instead, the “sphere” would bulge inwards where there were no “corridors” to other settlements, and protrude out where there were such. I use the difference in population density as a guide to how pronounced this effect is; a volume that could hold 1,335 Dwarves now has only 1,000 (the population density we worked out earlier) indicating that the bulk of the settlement is only 1000/1335 = 75% of the size indicated, or about 3/4 of a mile across; only where such corridors lead away from the settlement does it reach the entire mile diameter. But there’s no real need to do this, it’s just me being a little anal retentive.

The final note worth making is that this says nothing about how many “levels” there are within the community. This can be calculated – you need to know the lengths of a series of horizontal arcs across the cross-section of the sphere, then determine the areas of a number of circles with diameters of such arcs (a cross-sectional slice through a sphere is a circle) such that the total area matches that of the total population divided by a reasonable population density per level – which I would expect to be somewhat lower than human; you can’t “build” right next to the neighbors the way you might on the surface, you need “load-bearing” rock in between the hollow spaces you occupy. But this is too much like work even for me, I never bother. Instead, I guesstimate using a rough-and-ready shortcut.

For every such lesser circle, there is one still smaller that exactly equals the area of the main circle. So, instead of defining levels, I define pairs of levels – in fact, since the top is effectively a mirror image of the bottom, pairs of pairs of levels – until the total surface area (a simple multiple of 2, plus the original central cross section) is greater than the ratio of effective Dwarven population density divided by base human population density, where the “multiple” that results is the number of paired levels.

This gives a great deal of flexibility: if I make one level bigger than half the area, the other gets smaller; if I make one closer to half the area, the other also moves closer to being half the area.

Nor is there any need for a pair of levels both to be north of the “equator” – you can have one above and one below, if you want. Do this for most of them, and you end up with a community shaped more like a top – with projecting spikes.

Or you can assume that most of the mountain is solid rock, and Dwarven populations are no higher than Humans. Or something else completely. There are no wrong answers, only answers that have ramifications.

Population Index

Take whatever the lowest absolute population is and divide all the other population levels by this to get a Population Index. This gives a ranking of significance for the overall campaign of the influence of any single population group. Don’t be surprised to get values in the thousands or more – 10,000 Halflings and 50,000,000 Humans mean that for every Halfling there are 5,000 humans.

For most purposes, you are best off going from high to low. The index gives some indication of how small a minority you are talking about, and hence how minor their influence on the campaign is going to be.

Relative Population Index

I also find it useful to my thinking to add up the population indexes and get the percentages of each. So far, we have 5000 for humans and 1 for Halflings in the above example; let’s assume that the grand total comes to 12,500 (an unlikely result, it’s too round a number, but anyway…) That means that human societies are 40% of the total of the “civilized” societies. If you want to include Orcs and Goblins and so on, you can. This is nothing more than a Demographic Handling tool to help think clearly about the dominance of one society over another. Clearly, Halflings are nothing more than a strictly local group in this example.

This is particularly significant when thinking about Wars. I don’t care how effective they are on the battlefield, 40,000 Halflings pose no threat to 50 million humans. 100 million goblins, on the other hand…

I write the relative population index in brackets next to the actual index value: Halflings 1 (0.008%), Humans 5000 (40%), and so on.

Connect Races to Nexii

I’ve already talked about this in relation to Archetypes, so I won’t repeat myself.

Connect Races to Themes

This is also just an extension of the discussion regarding Themes and Archetypes, so I assume the reader is quite capable of working out how to do this for themselves.

Physical Capacities

I find it useful to give some general comparisons of racial abilities. Do Elves tend to be weaker or stronger than humans? Weaker or stronger than Dwarves? This says nothing about the potentials of individuals, just about how common those exceptions to the broader trend might be. This can be very useful information for players in characterizing PCs; what was it like for the character who grew up stronger than everyone around them? Or faster? Or more quick-witted?

On top of that, some races have additional abilities relative to humans. What impact do these have on the society?

Personality Profile

What’s the generic representative of the race like, in terms of personality? How far removed from the reality is that perception? Does any particular race or archetype have a different impression of the race?

Scope for individuality

How much latitude for individuality does the society offer? Do the encourage diversity, or conformity? What social mechanisms exist to implement these policies or traditions?

Social Stigmas

Are there any groups or sub-populations with social stigmas attached? How do these manifest? How do people subjected to this racial prejudice cope?

Population Levels

What impact do the population levels have on the race and on the society? Homogeneity requires a fair number of representatives or relatively little variation between individuals. What are the resulting agricultural demands? How large are the settlements? What is the impact on the economy, on the size of settlements, on the culture?


The Geography occupied by a population impacts that population in multiple ways. Some geographies won’t support some population levels without additional assistance, and that makes the population dependent on that assistance.

Population Density

You’ve already decided the population levels of the race, with a view to what is a reasonable population density; the geography dictates the actual population density, so putting the two together dictates how widespread the lands claimed by the race are.

Of course, trade can compensate to some degree for a lack of agricultural space, but humans have a way of expanding their numbers beyond what the lands they occupy can support – and then going off and having a war somewhere.

Population Center(s)

What are the major population centers, and what makes them distinct from each other?

Natural Resources

What natural resources does the society have access to? What DON’T they have direct access to? What are they dependent on, economically or socially?


Who are the enemies of the race? Very few will be able to answer “none” and the more significant the race, the smaller that tally becomes. On top of these obvious foes, there are a bunch of others that may not be so obvious.

Strategic Position

Every geographic feature is strategically positioned with respect to whatever’s on the far side of it. Sometimes there may be easier ways to get past this strategic position than bullying through it; but that can leave your flanks exposed to a potential enemy. So, ultimately, every feature is strategic, only the nature of the significance changes.

Some are more important than others because you stand between two forces that are hostile to each other (or hostile to you), and some are less because you have an alliance with your neighbors. But that’s only a matter of degree.

What is the strategic position of the lands occupied by this race, and what impact does that have on their society? Their economy? Their military? Their history?


Some societies are more vulnerable than others. Any form of dependence, as noted earlier, is a vulnerability in the military sense.

In addition, there may be social vulnerabilities. These have either already manifested into ongoing civil disturbances, or they are a lurking time bomb. It’s fairly obvious how the first should be handled – who, what, where, when, outcome, response, and the current status of the problem; the second is a little trickier to achieve. The technique that works best is to include as a statement of fact in the racial profile something that is in fact an assumption on the part of the race. At the right time, you then have someone challenge that assumption, producing an immediate social crisis.

Some of these are very obvious – “Dwarves are completely loyal to the throne”. That won’t do; you need to be more subtle but just as profound in importance. “The white tree only blooms when a royal heir is born” is a better choice. You then have the tree bloom when the Queen is childless (or even apparently dead), or have it fail to bloom when the Queen gives birth to a supposed heir. The implications are obvious – or perhaps someone is trying to manipulate the order of succession by using magic to manipulate the blooming of the tree. Either way, the implications are likely to tear the society apart, at least for a while. It might even be that the royal family has been manipulating things in the past, bringing the tree to bloom “unnaturally” after spreading the legend themselves, as a way of enhancing their legitimacy – and would have done so again, quite successfully, if it weren’t for the manipulations of a second party who believed.

A social vulnerability is anything that a culture is not equipped to handle. And that’s something that an enemy can sometimes exploit, either to harm the culture, or to distract it prior to a surprise strike – if they are clever enough, manipulative enough.

Most Recent Conflict(s)

The social impact of the most recent military conflict in which a a society has been engaged are deep and lingering. It takes time for a former enemy to be accepted as a neutral party, never mind as an ally; mistrust and suspicion run deep, compounded by wartime propaganda.

In some respects this is less of an issue in fantasy campaigns because there are no mass communications; the lord labels someone an enemy, you go off and fight the soldiers of that enemy, and that’s an end of it. Repeated conflicts, as between the English and the French, are a quite different story, of course.

On the other hand, there is a common perception that the uneducated tend to hold simple grudges far more deeply once they are established and ingrained. Hillbilly feuds are legendary (and by that, I mean both inflated out of all proportion and a case in point). So you have a wide latitude, but either way, the last conflict, its outcome, and the impact on both societies, are very much something that needs to be described in player briefings.


As significant as enemies are the people with whom a society or culture are allied, because that makes them stronger in the face of their enemies. When the foes are mutual antagonists, that doesn’t matter much, but when there is a more complex set of national relationships involved, things can get very interesting.

For each Ally, then, you also need to list those populations who are enemies of yours simply because of your association with that Ally.

Most Recent Alliance(s)

No matter how it turned out, the most recent alliance that was publicly put to the test is going to have left strong feelings amongst some of the population. It will also have influenced and entered the social consciousness. The relationship and what resulted will dictate the nature of this “emotional baggage”. Could anyone doubt that post-war relations between the US and Great Britain were altered as a result of World War II? The “Plucky Brits” entered the popular zeitgeist of the US, and there was a reciprocal impression of the US that entered the common attitude of the Brits (“Brash Yanks”) at the same time. “We saved your a** in the Big One,” is inevitably followed by the reply, “Yes, and you never fail to remind us of it.”

On top of that, the most recent alliance that is publicly known will evoke opinions, often negative, and – with reasonable frequency – hostility. Depending, of course, on what relations were like beforehand. So this relationship should also get documented.


Which brings us to the subject of politics in general. You can lose a lot of time and waste a lot of effort going into too much detail in this area and still barely scratch the surface. So I recommend very tightly restricting your notes to the bare minimum specified below.

Government Authority Type

Theocracy? Plutocracy? Democracy? Empire? Confederation of city-states? As succinctly and briefly as possible, note the Government Authority Type. Then specify at least one thing that makes this example of that type of Government Authority. Johnn Four’s excellent series here at Campaign Mastery ‘City Government Power Bases’ (which I intend to extend later this year – one series at a time!) may be useful reference.

Level of Authority

How absolute is the government’s authority? How much freedom and latitude do they permit their citizens? I use an arbitrary score out of ten, but you can use one out of four, five, twenty, or whatever else takes your fancy – so long as you are consistent about it. That number, plus an indication of what it means (e.g. “Level Of Authority 7/10″) is enough, unless you have something unusual in mind. Whenever a subject comes up in play (“Marriage restrictions”), all you have to do is roll a die to determine whether the Government has imposed rules in that area. The Government Authority Type then gives an indication of the nature of the regulations.

Domestic Satisfaction

How happy are the citizens with their government? Or, perhaps more usefully, how Unhappy are they? I use a number from one to 10. This is the chance on 2d20 that there will be an armed insurrection or rebellion of some sort fermenting (get the same result a second time for them to be active and publicly known), the chance on d20 that an incident will turn into a riot (assuming a crowd is present and provoked by the incident), the chance on d10 that citizens will protest or complain in the most socially-permissible manner (which varies according to the government type and level of authority) – it might be anything from a go-slow or complaints muttered under the breath to a group of protesters with placards, etc).

Religious Authority

How strong a grasp does the most popular religion have over the community? If this rating is higher than the Government’s level of authority then the Government is effectively reduced to a figurehead to at least some extent. Another score out of 10, therefore.

Religious Tolerance

How tolerant are the Political authorities of lesser religions? How tolerant is the dominant religion? How tolerant is the broader society? I rate each of these out of 10, and write the result as follows: “Religious Tolerance 7/4/9″. I will sometimes draw a simple flag symbol to denote the Political score and a Cross to represent the Religious score, but I try to be consistent so that I don’t need such mnemonics.

Observe that the combination of scores can describe quite subtle and complex situations. Take the example above: the government is fairly restrictive in terms of what it considers a “real religion”, the dominant religion preaches tolerance and brotherhood, and the public are extremely intolerant of anything too different. Sometimes I think that the religious authority level should be the difference between the latter two values, sometimes I think the two should be independent. In this case, 9-4=5, so the religious authority score should be 5.

The “yea” argument for this approach is that the difference reflects the degree to which the people will do what the religious authority tells them to, and this is the Religious Authority score, by definition. The “nay” argument is that the Religious Authority score is an overall summary, and that authority in more specific areas might vary, so there is only a vague relationship between the difference and the Religious Authority score.

Choose your own methodology and just be consistent about it.

Other Secondary Authorities

In Australia, we have a Federal Government, a small set of State Governments, a whole mess of Local Governments, and a couple of Territory Governments. The US has the same basic arrangement with rather more States, and (I think) an additional layer of City Governments (the Local Governments being the equivalent of Counties). They also have State Governors, which we don’t, and have a habit of electing various officials Individually (our officials are appointed by an appropriate branch of Government or are part of the Public Service). The organizations and internal structures of each of these layers of government are different, of course. We have a Senate but don’t have a Congress, for example.

In no greater length than I have used to do so in the two examples contained within the preceding paragraph, list the levels and layers of Secondary Authority.

Key Individuals

Finally, who are the key individuals whose name everybody knows? Name the relevant ones, ignore the rest (or treat them generically). Further, who are the popular Heroes and who are the popular Villains of history? Who is the most notorious individual who is at large (or has been, until recently)? Who are the most famous figures from History? And what are these peoples’ claims to fame?


Describing a Society is another task that can consume great quantities of time. Page after Page of unnecessary detail can easily emerge -and the only way to prevent it is to be absolutely ruthless with yourself. Once again, what’s below is as succinct and restrictive as I can make it.

Family Unit

Almost everyone that the PCs interact with will be a member of a family. In some campaigns, the workplace will often be completely separate from the place of residence, in others the two will be one and the same thing. If the family usually lives with the individual, knowing the structure of the typical family unit and the courting process has obvious value; these are people who are likely to be nearby when the NPC is encountered. Even in the first campaign type, though, knowing the structure of the common family unit gives NPCs something and someone to talk about when interacting with PCs.

Even more important in both cases is that almost every PC will also be a member of a family unit. Knowing the structure of those family units helps players develop their PCs, and the same is true of every entry on this list that falls under the heading of “Society”.

Family Units are best generally described in two different ways. The first is the “layers perspective”, which describes who is where within a family unit in terms of relative immediacy. The second is the “migration perspective” which indicates the social mechanisms and traditions by which members can move into the family unit from outside, or move from one layer to another within the broader family unit.

Family Unit Layers
There are three significant layers: Immediate, Close, and Remote. Modern & High-tech Campaigns may require the addition of a fourth layer, “Distant”.

The Immediate layer contains everyone within a family unit who normally resides in a single dwelling with the head of household, and it is this proximity that gives the layer its name. The position of “Head Of The Household” may be an actual one within the social fabric or it may be a nominal label shared by several, or even by a family council in which all members of the household make some contribution to the management decisions of the family.

The Close layer contains former members of the Immediate layer who have left to establish their own family units, and may sometimes include members of a more extended family. What they all have in common is that under certain conditions, it is normal and expected for members of this family to move back into the Immediate Family layer either temporarily or indefinitely. In campaigns and societies where extended travel/relocation for an entire family unit is unusual, such as most fantasy campaigns, the members of the Close layer also tend to live relatively nearby to the central Family Unit – hence the name.

The Remote layer contains the rest of the extended family. These may occasionally visit or send messages, and networks of relatives may provide avenues for social news to spread, but they are not part of the social routine of the central Family Unit on a day-to-day basis. In the context of campaigns with easy communications, these are the family members that you contact regularly by phone or social media, or who you spend time writing to on a regular basis during a postal-service era or equivalent.

The em>Distant layer only exists as a separate entity when you have such remote-contact means at your disposal, and contains family members who were once in a closer layer but with whom contact is not regularly maintained. I have cousins who I used to see at least once a year, but with whom I have fallen out of contact over the years. They aren’t quite as disconnected as total strangers, because those closer links were there, once upon a time, and can be reestablished – but it doesn’t happen very often.

The question to be answered in this sub-step of the development process is, “Who is usually in which layer?” Is it normal for Parents and Grandparents who are no longer capable of unassisted living to reside within the Immediate Family, for example? Is it normal for daughters who are soon to give birth to move back into the immediate family under the care of their mother, at least until such time as they have daughters of their own of child-bearing age?

In some societies, it may be normal for specific non-family members to assume a quasi-familial relationship with a given family unit, so the population of a layer may not be restricted to blood relations and their spouses. In some country towns in both England and Australia, up until fairly recently, the local Vicar or Parish Priest was very often considered and treated as a Close family member, expected to join the immediate family for a meal if he happened to be visiting at the right time of day, and expected to visit for a while at least every week or two, when he would be enlightened to the family gossip and would in turn pass on the significant news from other members of the Parish. Similarly, there was a time in the US where it was quite normal for a Doctor to do the rounds of his patients, visiting them at home every month or two just to see how everyone was going. I can quite easily imagine a society in which it is normal for each family to contain a “social representative” from outside the family within the Close layer purely to keep the family in touch with social expectations and obligations, and to deal with any grievances the community at large has with the Family Unit or members therein. I can imagine a democracy in which each Family Unit has a vote cast by the Head Of Household on behalf of the entire Immediate Family – thereby making the family more important both socially and politically than the individual, and requiring family registration and so on.

Quite obviously, you can’t complete the populating and structuring of a typical family unit without also working on the Migration aspects built into the social norm, and vice-versa. The two have to be constructed in parallel, as each Migration Path adds members to one or more layers, or takes them out under certain conditions. Is it normal for the eldest son to remain within the Immediate Family Unit, eventually to inherit both the “Head Of Household” title and any family business? Is it normal for Daughters to remain within the Immediate Family layer until wed? Can they earn outside incomes, and if they do, do those earnings become part of the collective finances of the Immediate Family, in whole or in part? Is Divorce permitted, and what happens to the family unit when this occurs?

I use bullet-points to list the members of each layer by general category, and with each such member, I note the ways in which those family members usually leave that layer of the family unit. I then consider the common social customs – marriage, adoption, etc – by which family members may leave or enter a layer, and add additional members to each layer at the same time as adding that custom to the migration paths (a different bullet list). I think about external members of the family units and whether or not such things are considered normal. I slowly build up a picture of the elements of a typical family, in this fashion, until I feel I am done – then I convert each bullet list into a paragraph on the family unit and the social practices that add or subtract members from it.

Domestic Life

A simple paragraph on the normal domestic life is then relatively simple; it describes the impact of social norms and the economy on the typical household. Under some circumstances, it may emerge that the family unit as described is incompatible with the economic reality of the culture being created; in which case, something needs to give in order to make survival possible. That something is usually a restructuring of the typical family unit away from the accepted “normal ideal” already stated, triggering a social evolution within the society (whether it wants one or not), but it might also be that social customs stand firm and whole families are on the verge of starvation. How do the people react to that? Is poaching common? Are there charitable institutions that work to fill the gap between enough and survival?


Of course, in order to write that paragraph on Domestic Life, you need to have some idea as to the state of the Economy. In particular, the standard of living in terms of the number of people who can be supported by a typical single working member within the household. I have usually decided this in the course of writing the paragraph on the Domestic Life of the members of the society being created, so it’s simply a matter of writing it down. I can then turn to two other important economic elements that need description: the domestic economy, and the trade economy.

The domestic economy is about what people do for a living. In general, there will be some presence of just about everything, so what needs to get reported here are the big picture and any anomalies. In part, this comes back to the geographic location of the population. If there are lots of trees and not a lot of good rock, they will have lots of timber buildings and carpenters to build and furnish them, for example. Food distribution is another major consideration at this point.

The trade economy is about what surpluses the society creates and who the customers are for those products. In cultures without industrialized commerce – currency exchanges and the like – the choice of customer will be dictated by what those customers can offer in exchange, as much as anything else. How the goods are to be transported is another major consideration.

I like to do one short paragraph on the “Big Picture”, one on the domestic economy and any anomalies, one on agriculture and food distribution, one on trade and trade partners, and one on the shipping of trade goods. That’s five paragraphs, and between them they should take up rather less than a page.

What’s more, these get successively quicker to write. Each one that you do not only adds to the information on the society you are currently detailing but also partially completes the work on a trading partner or two or even three. If you start with the wealthiest economy in terms of surplus trade goods and work down from that, you will find the picture filling in for ALL the societies you are creating progressively getting easier and faster.

The Arts

There are whole cultures out there about whom everything we know has derived from the ruins they left behind, and the products of their arts: literate, musical, and fine (sculpture and painting). From Ancient Egypt to Babylon to the Greeks and Romans to the Vikings, the arts are key to our understanding of the society. Even more recently, Bohemian Coffee Houses from the 50s where people listened to readings of the latest Beat Poetry link that poetry to the subculture in a totally iconic way. So the arts are important, even vital.

No-one expects a GM to be an art expert, and no player would stand still for a long dissertation on art. But a little goes a long way, and is very definitely better than nothing. What we care about for campaign development, in general terms, are how the arts interact with the lives of the ordinary citizens. Decorative weapons and hilts, the style of sculptures and such at temples and churches, do people go to the theater – things like that, which clearly influence the look-and-feel of the culture.

I listed four distinct arts at the start of this section; a short paragraph on what’s popular and what’s famous in each of them is enough for players and the GM to hit the high points without wasting time on a lot of research. I would add one final paragraph on what art would be present in the typical family home, and perhaps another on what would be on display in public places that PCs are likely to go – inns, bars, perhaps a typical corporate headquarters in a more contemporary or futuristic era.


We’ve already made some decisions about the religion of the society, but as yet nothing substantive about what the actual theology is. It’s time to correct that. There are three basic areas of significance under the general heading of Theology, and I would write a paragraph on each.

The first is the creation myth, if any, in a nutshell. This is sometimes a manifestation of wider attitudes within the society, and is hardly ever in direct contradiction with those attitudes. It’s no coincidence that the theory of the Big Bang emerged during a period when science fiction was prophesying an explosive diaspora of mankind out into the galaxy – or that less “explosive” theories like the Steady State came into vogue when space exploration began to contract and people focused more on planet Earth. And now, with a more spasmodic interpretation of the Big Bang in favor, is it a coincidence that manned space flight is back on the agenda in the form of a mission to Mars? Maybe, but there seems too much of a coincidence about it for this pattern to be dismissed. You can also see something similar in the way that Biblical accounts of creation were interpreted during the ages of wind-power exploration in comparison with the interpretations that were in vogue before the Reformation – or so I’ve been told, I’m not an expert on religious beliefs of the period. What I do know is that a little consistency in this respect helps reinforce the overall perception of the society, and that alone makes this effort worthwhile.

The second item is the religious influence on what is considered acceptable behavior and what is not. This goes beyond what is considered criminal, to cover all the more petty standards of behavior that tend to be ingrained into citizens from childhood.

The third and final item are what the theology has tried to suppress, either successfully or unsuccessfully, and in particular, what superstitions persist despite serious efforts at undermining them.

Both of these items are useful for adding a touch of the “native society” to characters, be they PCs or NPCs.

Religious Practices

Of course, there was something that was very obviously not included in the discussion on Theology – how people worship – the forms, the timings, and so on. What are the religious practices of the society?


How are people educated? Is classroom attendance mandatory? At what ages are people normally permitted to leave school and begin to make their own way in the world? Are there any forbidden subjects? Are there any peculiarities?

Recent History

Yet another aspect of a racial write-up that can consume vast amounts of time and effort, often of little value, especially since the most worthwhile parts would form part of the background development of individual adventures. Instead, I divide recent history into three smaller subjects that are just enough for players and GMs to play characters deriving from the society.

Race Relations

This is a fairly obvious one, there’s not a lot to say. Are there any races that this race/society particularly gets on with? Are there any that they particularly dislike? Are there any who have changed from one category to another – that tends to be the result of fairly dramatic and interesting events that leave all sorts of marks on a society! Simple questions, profound answers.

Current Social Issues

What are the social problems and questions that are most pressing? What are the ones that are most important in the minds of the public? What is being done about them? Do the people support this plan, do they consider it wrong or inadequate in some way?

Hot Topics of Conversation

Outside of social problems, what are the most prevalent subjects of casual conversation? What are the subjects that everyone has an opinion on, or an interest in?

Distilled Cultural Essence & other further reference

There are a lot more simple questions like this that can be used to flesh out and define a society. This formed the basis of the first major series that I wrote here at Campaign Mastery, one that I can still happily recommend today: Distilled Cultural Essence (Four parts).

In addition to that series, there are seven other articles here at Campaign Mastery that are relevant to this subject, or to aspects thereof. In order of publication, they are:

And, beyond those references, last year Campaign Mastery hosted a round of the Blog Carnival in which the subject was “Location, Location, Location!” This link is to the Carnival Wrap-up page which describes and links to each of the articles – check them out for additional useful material and ideas.

Organizations & Relationships

Each race is likely to be the home of at least one organization of public note, possibly more. While the existence and basic (public) nature of these organizations and the relationships both between them and with authority should be known to all the players, regardless of race, those races whose homelands host the central authority or ruling body of an organization are likely to know a little more.

In a separate document, I create a list of organizations. It’s worth trolling through the campaign plan again to look for any organizations of note that get mentioned there. For each item on the list, I add a paragraph describing their purpose and public profile.

I then decide where they are most likely to have their headquarters, and why. Adding the location to the description, I also make an appropriate notation in the racial profile that we’ve been generating. I don’t proceed to this step until I have all the racial profiles done up to this point, which makes these choices a lot easier.

I add information to the racial profile that only members of that host culture will have noticed. There might be nothing, but that’s a little unusual. There might be a little more “personality” to the way the organization does things – that’s more appropriate. Or it might be something about how successful they are, or what sort of neighbors and citizens they make.

I then create a new document by copying the Organizations notes and name it “Organizations – GM’s Reference”. It starts with everything that’s already in the common player’s reference material, therefore. I copy and paste the additional information from the racial notes into this GM’s file – this helps ensure consistency in the handling of each organization every time they are encountered.

In the GM’s reference, I make notes on any organizations that are more than they seem, or not what they publicly claim to be, and what they are really up to. Finally, I make notes on relationships between organizations, and between organizations and authority. In some cases, where it will be reasonably publicly apparent, I will also annotate the racial profile with information on the relationship between the authorities of that culture and an organization.

The goal is always to make sure that the players have all the information that they need to play their characters, and that the GM has all the information that he needs to keep track of what is really going on.

There are two additional sources that I should point out under this heading:

The Keys to The Ten

We’re now approaching the end of this phase of the campaign creation process. In fact, it only remains to do a little bit of final housekeeping – integrating the three Nexii into the campaign plan.

Part Zero: Introduction/Grounding

Before the Nexii begin, ie before the players begin to work out what they think is going on within the campaign, there is a necessary indoctrination period. This might be completely contained by pre-campaign briefing notes, it may come to an end in the course of the first adventure, or it may even last until almost the end of that first adventure. Certainly, by the time that the second adventure starts it should have come to an end, or have started to do so. In Babylon 5, this phase occupied most of the first season, and was all about working out how Babylon-5 could/would function.

The transitions between Nexii layers don’t have to be hard and fast. It can be a gathering of clues/experiences that slowly add up into a complete picture. You decide when to pull the trigger that makes it seemingly clear.

Beginning, Middle, and End

Every story has a beginning, a middle, and an end. Each nexus is connecting tissue that relates one plotline to another, and that imbues those plotlines that are connected in this way with common characteristics. It might be members of a particular organization, or employees of a particular individual, or a particular plot against something the PCs care about (including against them) or even something more diffuse and abstract, such as a general impression that everything’s going to hell in a hand-basket for lots of little reasons.

Now that you have connected each of the Nexii with background elements, its’ time to finalize the integration of each Nexus into the campaign plan by locating the beginning of the beginning, the beginning of the middle, the beginning of the end – and the end-point of the Nexus within various adventures as seems appropriate. The beginning is the gathering of clues that suggest a connection between events, the middle starts when the players can no longer deny that there is a connection and need to react accordingly, the end is when they know, or begin to discover, the particulars of who and why the connection exists, and why it should matter to them.

Tone & Content

Once the various key stage markers have been matched to plot events, it’s time to think about what “plot look-and-feel” elements you are going to have in common to all the adventures that are being bound together. This is often nothing more than a common tonal value – gritty and grim, or gothically spectacular, or whatever. In the original Fumanor campaign, it was simply a growing awareness that all sorts of groups and individuals were paying unusually close attention to the PCs – themselves not really knowing why – and that the PCs kept getting caught in the fringes of things that were going on in the city they were inhabiting at the time. Eventually this culminated in the discovery of a Drow Double-agent, seemingly bringing an end to that entire plot arc; at first, he had seen them as something he could employ to distract people from what he was doing, then they became an irritant and distraction, then something he could take advantage of directly, then a direct threat as they began to close in. Only after he was exposed, and the PCs discovered that the Drow were masterminding a military campaign against the realm by Orcs, did they learn why the Drow – and various unrelated groups – were really so interested in them, as the main plot (the quest to choose the 13th Deity) started.

Ultimately, what you need to document is what impact each Nexus is going to have on the adventures experienced by the PCs. This binds the nexii to the campaign plan and to each of the PC races and archetypes who will be affected, effectively linking the PCs who will eventually be generated to the campaign plan, and making them a part of the campaign world.

We’re moving toward an end-point. With the completion of these notes, the skeletal outlines of the campaign are almost complete (there’s some minor bones, tendons, and cartilage still to add) but we’re just about at the point of putting some serious meat on these bare bones. Creating everything in note form makes it faster to create and change things, and to keep an eye on the big picture, but its time to start filling in the gaps. Actually, the racial and archetype profiles that we assembled in the course of this article will go a long way toward doing that, so you could say that we’ve already started. We’ve created a lot of spaces and labeled them “meat goes here”, to extent the metaphor. So, next time: Enfleshing!

PS: Ideas

You wouldn’t be a GM if you didn’t keep having ideas. It is to be expected that quite a number of them will have occurred to you in the course of the work described in this phase of the campaign creation process. Hopefully you’ve done as recommended in earlier parts of the series and kept a note of these in your ideas file, because you’re about to need them…

Comments (1)

Shadows In The Darkness – The nature of True Evil


It started in the course of a planning session for the next adventure in the Adventurer’s Club (Pulp) campaign, “Prison Of Jade”. We were fleshing out the villain’s motivations, and I (Mike) made a comment about the nature of Evil. Blair disagreed, saying “I don’t think that’s true evil at all” (or words to that effect).

Intrigued and surprised that so fundamental a difference had not been discovered in our many prior years of collaboration and general chat about games, comics, TV and Movies, the proposition of a collaborative article exploring the subject occurred to me immediately. Rather than getting sidetracked at the time, we made arrangements for a get-together this week to discuss it at greater length.

I did my best, while participating in that discussion, to keep notes, which this article attempts to wrestle into coherent form. It probably won’t be as well-organized as my usual articles because it has been built on a conversation, instead of being carefully and logically planned to cover a subject from all sides.

I should start by stating that we knew, going in, that there might be no real answers found. It was even possible that there are no real answers – philosophers and theologians have been debating the subject for more than 2000 years! Who were we to think that we could succeed where they have failed? Nevertheless, we chose to press on and see just how far we could go…

The Genre Significance

Morality – and the question of what is “Evil” – are central to a great many genres of RPG.

  • In Call Of Cthulhu and other Horror-themed genres, there is some form of Absolute Evil and morality is very black-and-white.
  • Pulp, too, tends to have very sharp moral dividing lines.
  • In Western games there tends to be a very black and white morality that divides the “White Hats” from the “Black Hats” as well – though that might be related to the fact that the Western Genre was at its peak on TV and in movies from the 1930s to the 1950s, eras in which morality was viewed as very rigidly defined in general.

Other Genres are far less rigid in their morality.

  • D&D and Pathfinder have their alignment system, which clearly states that there is a “True Evil” – but one that can only be understood in the context of the Law-Chaos alignment axis, so that you can never have “Pure Evil”, it’s “Lawful Evil” or “Chaotic Evil” or “Neutral Evil”.
  • Science Fiction runs the whole gamut from extremism to varying shades of gray.
  • Modern-Day and Cyberpunk are very flexible in what is morally permissible, and rarely dig too deeply into the questions of Evil – just expedience. Though there can be exceptions – the secret agent genre for example.
  • Superhero games manage to cover the entire range of options at the same time – while some characters are just a dark shade of gray, others may be described as “absolute evil” – with no adequate definition of what that means.

And that’s the common thread – a definition of “True Evil” is very hard to find in any source, and a functional one even harder to find. All too often, the definition is a negative one – “These are the things that Evil is not, and that the PCs are”.

Religious Neutrality

One thing that both Blair and I were keen to avoid was a religion-based definition of any sort. We wanted something that was both more agnostic and pragmatic in nature, a definition that could be applied to any gaming situation, but which did not exclude any theological definition that a particular faith might accept.

Wikipedia Unhelpful

Whenever a question like this comes up, the first resource we turn to is Wikipedia. While it may be inaccurate from time to time, and exasperatingly incomplete in others, it is usually an excellent starting point.

Not this time, though – their definition of Evil is “the absence or complete opposite of that which is ascribed as being good. Often, evil is used to denote profound immorality. In certain religious contexts, evil has been described as a supernatural force.”

And that, in a nutshell, is the problem; Evil is defined in terms of what it is not, rather than what it is, which makes defining “True Evil” or “Absolute Evil” rather difficult.

Evil and Alignment

Another thing that we wanted to sidestep were interminable discussions of the D&D Alignment system. We considered this to be an attempt to create a game-mechanic that described a relative morality for the purposes of inter-character relations; it did not go far enough for our purposes. We wanted to arrive at a functional definition of True Evil, evil that was uncontaminated by Chaos/Law considerations.

Besides, I had already done a five-part series on Alignment, and didn’t want to cover any of the same ground – tricky, in that part five specifically describes “evil” campaigns.

The Ultimate Selfishness

The definition that I have always worked from is that Evil is an expression of Selfishness – putting your own benefit, however slight, ahead of the interests of others. Even the potential for gain is worth any amount of suffering inflicted on others, from the standpoint of this definition. For most characters, that definition remains sufficient, and the question of “How evil is the character” can be restated far more effectively as “How far will the character go to obtain a self-perceived benefit or advantage?”.

It was my statement of this basic definition that prompted Blair to comment that he disagreed, and thought that there was a “True Evil” that went beyond this definition, starting the whole conversation.

True Evil: more than self-gratification?

I started by proposing that perhaps True Evil was simply a moral position that gave an “evil person” permission to inflict pain and misery for their own gain. That moral position may be self-chosen or ordained by outside authority. True Evil was not the actions themselves, which were simply an expression of the moral condition; the evil was whatever permitted the character to act on those desires, or perhaps the absence of something that prevented non-evil people from acting in that fashion.

This proposal was an attempt to start from, but move beyond, the definition that I offered above. However, it was my impression that Blair thought that evil was something more than this, that it was more malicious – an impression that he immediately confirmed.

A lot of what gets described as evil is mere pragmatism without restraint; even acts against possible future opposition can be judged in this context. “True Evil,” he said, “Acts because it can, not because it has to. It takes pleasure in what it does.”

But putting your own satisfaction, your own pleasure, ahead of the welfare of others is simply an expression of Selfishness, so taking pleasure in “evil acts” or committing “evil acts” simply for your own gratification is covered by my initial definition. If there is a True Evil that lies beyond that definition, it has to be more than simple self-gratification.

True Evil: more than Ruthlessness?

This gave us the outline of a process by which we might eventually reach a satisfactory conclusion. By considering various acts considered to be “evil”, and determining whether or not they could be categorized as somehow being less than “True Evil”, we would eventually hone in on the functional definition that we sought.

Blair started by raising Nazi behavior during World War II – the concentration camps, the systematic abuse and slaughter of groups that the Nazis disapproved of. Nazis are favorite villains in the Pulp Genre because the things they did were so vile by any reasonable moral code. There is no question that the Nazis were absolutely ruthless in pursuing their agenda, and that the agenda in question was villainous, but was this an example of True Evil?

Until recently, I would have answered yes; but a recent documentary has shed new light on that ruthlessness in my mind. The Nazi regime was spending money that it didn’t have in order to prop up their economy, to such an extent that they ceased publishing their annual balance of trade and budgets. All the Nazi big infrastructure and rearmament projects were funded with money the Nazis didn’t have. Nor could they simply sell debt to other countries in the form of government bonds and the like; no-one wanted to buy them. The Nazis even resorted to secretly buying their own government bonds to give the impression that the economy was in far better shape than was really the case.

In order to keep the regime afloat, to raise enough money to meet the public payroll and fund their ongoing projects, it was absolutely necessary to dispossess a large percentage of the population of their property and valuables, or to raise taxes to disastrous levels. Choosing the first course rather than an act that would have seriously undermined their credibility as managers of the economy, it remained only to select the targets – and these were (of course) chosen on ideological grounds. The mentally ill, homosexuals, criminals, Jews, Eastern Europeans, those of mixed blood – the list of targets goes on. The Concentration Camps enabled these groups to be maintained for a pittance for use as slave labor, saving further costs in the infrastructure and munitions industries.

This resulted in short-term gains, but did not solve the systemic problem; some form of ongoing program of conquest was inevitable, enabling them to loot and pillage other economies in order to keep their own afloat. Some analysts have suggested that when Poland was invaded, Germany might have had only enough money to pay the military for another week! The first thing that the Nazis did when capturing a new town was to go to the local banks and empty them of currency, valuables, and precious metals.

Even this wasn’t enough; as the war dragged on, and especially once the Eastern Front was opened, agriculture was suffering from the lack of manpower, and from the diversion of resources such as fuel into ongoing military operations. Memoranda have been found in which the resources being allocated to the care and feeding of those incarcerated in the camps are repeatedly reduced, and it becomes clear in some of them that a massive reduction in the population being held was necessary to reduce the drain on the economy. There were further benefits, from the Nazi perspective: these measures reduced the number of guards required, freeing up manpower for military action elsewhere, for example on the Russian Front. The “Final Solution”, as horrid and despicable as it was, is thus shown to be an extremist form of economic ruthlessness filtered through and cloaked in ideology.

It’s selfishness again – but an impersonal kind of selfishness in which one or more subgroups of a population are deemed unworthy of receiving the benefits of society, and can be exploited as necessary for the benefit of the rest. That makes the Nazi pogroms analogous to the institution of slavery in the US and elsewhere in earlier centuries, simply carried to greater extremes.

Absolute Evil

We didn’t spend as much time discussing the above as I have in this article, because we had already discussed the revelations of the documentary series on an earlier occasion. Instead, we were able to move quite quickly on to a new proposed definition: “True Evil is anything evil performed when there is no personal gain (or risk of personal loss) but you do it anyway”.

This excludes as a lesser manifestation of True Evil any acts carried out for a reason, including evil acts committed in furtherance of an agenda. Absolute evil has to go beyond reasons, ambitions, or agendas, it has to go beyond being evil for personal pleasure or satisfaction.

Most villains, even in a black-and-white morality genre, are not absolute evil; they are motivated by the potential gain of wealth, power, or revenge, or the satisfaction of ambition. Absolute, True, Evil has to be something more, something worse.

The Psychology Of True Evil

In fact, there was only one example that I could think of from Popular Culture that was not contained within this exclusion zone: Hannibal Lector from The Silence Of The Lambs. He didn’t do evil things for pleasure, he did evil things and found ways to take pleasure from those acts. Blair agreed, and suggested that the serial killer being pursued in that movie was arguably a second example; after all, it was the similarity between the two that led to Lector being consulted in the first place.

This raised some disturbing questions that we didn’t answer at the time (though we did eventually find a solution, which I’ll get to in due course):

Do you have to be psychologically disturbed to be Truly Evil?

Can you be Truly Evil if you aren’t psychologically disturbed?

The Corrosion Of The Soul

It’s a truism of serial killers that they get worse and act more frequently as their “careers” progress. It’s like addiction, in which you need more and more to get the same “high” as you build up a tolerance. The more evil you commit, the more evil you become.

By suggesting that True Evil is amoral, producing behavior that is unchecked by morality, this brought us back to the question I had posed earlier. Paraphrased: “is Evil that which gives the individual or group license to commit evil acts, or is it the acts themselves?”

Evil is a slippery slope, each act of evil leaving its mark on the psychology of the person committing it, and making a further step into darkness seem small, until acts that were once unthinkable become acceptable.

Does being psychologically disturbed simply give “permission” to be evil?

Aztec Sacrifices, Vampires and Relative Morality

Leaving those three questions hanging, Blair then turned to another example of Evil for discussion.

Aztec sacrifices were not evil, or even immoral, from the Aztec point of view, because they believed the act was not only religiously ordained but religiously mandated. From the perspective of the victims and their societies, however, they would have seemed to be pretty evil.

Similarly, there was the question of Vampires, which exist in many game genres. Are they inherently evil? They feed on humans – but they have to feed on something. Vampirism was usually something inflicted on an individual; they are victims of any True Evil involved as much as the lives that they consume. It followed that simply being a Vampire did not make you Truly Evil.

Blair suggested that becoming a vampire willingly was a more evil act than simply becoming a vampire, because of the volition. But I countered with the question of sacrifice – someone becoming a vampire, sacrificing themselves to protect another from the same fate, or to join someone they loved more than life itself in a state of undeath. Are either of those an Evil act?

Personally, I think they both are, but the reasoning is a little convoluted; rather than going more deeply into the matter at the time, the conversation moved on, but I think I’ll take a moment to spell it out before this article does likewise.

Case #1, Self-sacrifice to spare another: Either way, someone becomes a monster. In the final analysis, it’s an act of selfishness, choosing to be the instrument of destruction of others in order to spare you from the need to kill a monster who was once someone you loved. Or seeking to find a way for you both to survive by fighting back – you might fail, might die in the attempt, might even both become undead – but it’s a surrender and a perversion of the love you proclaim. Remember that even if the person for whom you are making this quixotic gesture survives, they will have to live with the outcome for the rest of their lives, including a sense of guilt and responsibility for every life you destroy. your choice may be the lesser or two evils, from your perspective, but that still makes it a choice of evil.

Case #2, Becoming undead because someone you love has become undead and you can’t bear to live without them: again, this is an act of selfishness, and a far clearer one than the first. You are becoming a monster because you can’t face the alternative: striving to end the un-life of a loved one. Instead of one monster, two result, and the blood of every future victim is on your hands.

Both are romantic gestures, but are foolish ones that can only end tragically, and both are evil. However, the fact that they can be justified on emotional grounds also means that they are not representative of the Ultimate Evil. Voluntarily embracing Vampirism can be more Evil than being an innocent “convert” – but it has to be for selfish ends, and therefore still remains part of the excluded category.

Apathy and Evil

This confirmed to us that acts can be wrong, even evil, without being Truly Evil. Absolute Evil had to extend beyond any form of reasonable justification.

Blair then posited that it might be considered Evil not to help someone when you are in a position where you can do so. Is apathy Evil? Can it be excused on grounds of pragmatism? After all, you might need the resources expended on helping the other person at some future point yourself. It follows that helping another is always a risk in some degree. However, because the future is unknowable, you can’t be sure either way – the moral question is whether it is better to take the risk.

It follows that acts of charity are meritorious in inverse proportion to the individual’s capacity. When you have little or nothing, even a small act of charity should be lauded. When you have plenty, the same act of charity is trivial. Not empty, certainly not meaningless, but niggardly and greedy – and pathetic. (Nor does it matter, in this context, whether or not the act achieves the goal set for it; intentions, not outcomes are what count, when the act of giving is involved).

How about failing to notify the authorities of a potential danger to someone else because you don’t want to get involved? Failing to report suspected domestic violence or child abuse on the part of a neighbor because you don’t want the embarrassment of having to confront the neighbors later? Are you driving the final wedge into a relationship, tearing a family apart, or are you potentially saving someone’s life? How much latitude should people be given to work out their own problems?

These are difficult questions, without clear-cut answers. It was only when I offered another example of apathy that matters began to clarify for us: If you see someone drowning, and aren’t a strong swimmer, are you justified in not diving in?

The answer is yes – if there is some other way to help. Summoning help, or throwing a rope or flotation aid, for example. The question then becomes simply one of degree, of not doing as much as you can afford to do. Once again, it is possible to describe the withholding of assistance that you can afford to proffer as a form of selfishness (actually, it could be several different forms of selfishness but that doesn’t matter).

Apathy, standing by in silence instead of speaking up about an injustice, can be evil, but it is not Absolute Evil because it can be justified, however mean-spirited that justification.

Rational Justification

Time was beginning to grow short, but the conversation had circled repeatedly back to the same point: if there is a rational justification, evil is not absolute because there is a justification for the behavior other than evil.

Therefore, only in the absence of a rational justification can Evil be absolute.

That doesn’t mean that any justification is enough to exclude an act from being Absolute Evil. Justifications can be flawed in logic or in basic assumptions, and still make the difference between Evil and Absolute Evil. However, completely irrational justifications are not enough to exclude an act of evil from representing Absolute Evil.

Consider thrill-killing and serial murder, for example the cases of Ivan Milat and the Snowtown murders. These, and many other serial killings, had no rational justification beyond addiction to the thrill of killing, the yielding to an impulse generated by desire for the thrill without restraint or compunction.

It seems almost a definitive association between such crimes and the perpetrator being psychologically disturbed, either psychopathic or sociopathic (refer section in the page on Psychopathy just linked to).

Is that just an easy out? Is there more to Absolute Evil than sociopathic and psychopathic acts?

The Acts Of Evil

Blair suggests that while the reasons for a murder might be pragmatic, the methodology e.g. unnecessary torture of the victims before killing them, could be considered evil (I thought this was a critical point so I got him to write it rather than risking a misquotation). Therefore actions, in and of themselves, can be evil, even absolute evil.

I don’t disagree with that – but would then have to ask whether or not that represents an absolute evil. Again, the key word that defines an answer is “Unnecessary”. If such acts were to be somehow justified as “necessary”, that means that a case can be made for reasonable justification of the act. It may still be morally wrong, even evil – but it is not an Absolute Evil. It is only in the absence of that justification that such acts transcend “ordinary evil” and become representative of “True Evil”.

The functional definitions: a conclusion of sorts

That – aside from one final note that I will address in a few moments – was where time ran out. We had reached a conclusion of sorts, but it has been left to me to try and condense that conclusion into final form in the form of functional definitions.

  • Evil Acts are voluntary acts that are destructive in some manner. This destruction can have an external victim or be directed at the individual committing the act (i.e. be “Self-destructive”). To be evil, these acts must also knowingly and deliberately exceed a threshold of harm to the victim, which is usually defined in terms of the individuals capacity to recover from the harm. The damage inflicted can be physical, emotional, psychological, or moral. Evil acts can include Apathy (the act of “doing nothing” or knowingly doing less than is necessary).
  • Performing Evil Act makes a person, group, place, object, or other circumstance Evil. Most evil can be “justified” in terms of Selfishness, and are motivated by Ambition or the drive for Wealth, Power, Self-defense, or Revenge. Most villains, even in moralistically extreme game genres, are not absolutely evil and can “justify” their actions, no matter how ruthless or extreme, through one of these motives. Such justifications are an important tool for the characterization of the villain.
  • Evil acts make it easier to commit still more intensely-evil acts in the future, as the success of the act erodes the restraints that morality, social norms, and social expectations place between the evil person and the commission of such actions. Evil can be considered addictive and only through abstinence is reform possible.
  • Absolute Evil exists only when no rational justification beyond the pleasure or satisfaction of the individual can be provided as to the motive for the Evil Act. Irrational justifications are not enough to relegate Evil to the lesser standard.

Going Further: Applying the definitions

There was one question posed during the discussion that has not been brought forward as yet: Does the definition of Absolute or True Evil vary from genre to genre?

Since we arrived at a functional definition that does not distinguish between genres, the answer is no. But that doesn’t mean that some genres can’t have expressions or manifestations of Absolute Evil that others lack.

At one point in the discussion, when we were talking about Call Of Cthulhu, I suggested that betraying your species or race or whatever group with which you identify for personal gain of some sort was evil, but that knowingly doing so with no prospect of such gain was still more evil, possibly even True Evil. Whether it is done as some sort of act of revenge, or simply for the love of destruction, the level of malice exhibited by such actions takes them a step beyond any rational justification.

This isn’t the same thing as betraying a Wagon Trains route and schedule to the Indians in a western game. That is also betraying your race or nation to another, but the scale matters. It isn’t the same thing as selling or giving state secrets to another nation, or exposing them to the public, either, though those can arguably be considered to inflict harm on a greater scale than the Wagon Train.

If people have souls in the theological sense, rather than just identities in the psychological sense, then the immortality of the soul makes the corruption or destruction of a soul a far greater offense than simply selling someone into slavery, or torturing someone to death. I find myself going back to the discussion of Vampirism; True Evil can be an evil act that victimizes individuals beyond those immediately targeted in terms of the scale of damage inflicted. Killing or maiming a roomful of innocent victims simply to be sure of killing or maiming one individual carries an act beyond rational justification, no matter what justification may exist in terms of that one individual. The word “innocent” is very important there; a different standard applies when your target is one individual but everyone caught in the “splash” is a justifiable target of lesser importance only relative to that target individual.

Evil is being willing to harm the innocent to achieve one’s ends. What varies from genre to genre are the manners in which harm can be inflicted, and the potential scale of that harm both in severity, in permanence, and in scale. Consider the possible forms and manifestations of harm in your campaign’s genre, and you can determine what the Ultimate Evil is within that campaign, evil beyond any hope of redemption. The answers both define an essential element of the campaign and place all other acts of villainy that may be encountered into context, enriching your game immeasurably.

Comments (2)

Inn Through The Side Door – Reinvigorating the cliché


Resized Photo “Manchester 51″ by “Royal Olive” via (flickr search utility) licensed under Creative Commons 2.0 – click on the image to view the license.

After a solid effort, it’s become clear that I’m not even close to having the next part of the New Beginnings series ready to publish, and the deadline is now less than 20 minutes away, so I’m resorting to another filler post, one that I’ve been saving for just this purpose.

This was inspired by a link that Hungry at Ravenous Role Playing shared in the same week that he happened to plug a couple of my articles.

The original article, FYI, was “You … save??… a tavern??” by John Arcadian at Gnome Stew which I’m happy to acknowledge! Thanks to both Hungry and John for the inspiration!

You can read John’s article (and watch the video he in turn links to), and read what Hungry had to say about it, which in turn inspired me, by clicking on the links above.

Starting campaigns in an inn or tavern was pretty much the first cliché of D&D, and therefore of RPGs, so far as I’m aware. So much so that it is practically synonymous with two different phenomena: a lack of imagination, or the PCs as afterthoughts. Neither are necessarily true, mind; but that’s the popular perception in gaming.

And yet, this is one of the few logical places where people of disparate prior existences might rub shoulders, making it an inherently sensible sort of place for a party of adventurers to encounter and get to know each other – so long as you accept the metagame premise that “they will team up because they are all PCs”. It’s often easy to tell who the PCs are, anyway, as soon as the environment is described, simply because of the relative level of detail in the descriptions. Most of the occupants of the room will be generic cut-outs, and the few who aren’t will stick out like a sore thumb.

Some GMs concentrate efforts on eradicating this overt NPC discrimination, seeking to impress with the depth of the personalities present. This is often a problem because it is usually false advertising; the GM has invested way more effort into these throwaway characters than they merit.

This diverts from a profound problem that is usually overlooked. The PCs will usually come from many different social classes, and Inns and Taverns – if they aren’t in the back end of nowhere – will cater to a specific working class or social sub-group. The shipwrights will have one tavern, the wagon-masters and their staff will have another, no doubt there will be one for the hunters as well, and a couple for the soldiers, and so on. This reality is ignored in the name of expediently bringing the party together.

There are some alternatives worth considering – a group of fellow travelers banded together for mutual protection, or everyone being hired for the same job (often caravan protection – almost as common a cliché). But let’s say that you’re the sort of GM who delights in taking something so routine that it has become boring and giving it a twist – or that you want to be that sort of GM – and so have deliberately chosen to begin with the granddaddy cliché and deliberately do something different with it.

I can even envisage a strongly-serial “adventure of the week” in which each adventure starts off in a tavern, usually the same one, and something strange happens to lead to the adventure – in other words, using the inn as a framing device.

This article is being written as filler, something to appear the next time I get caught short by a deadline. I have listed below some twenty-five clever variations on the cliché for the general amusement of the readers and some creative inspiration for GMs out there that like a good twist on an old friend.

  1. An intelligence agent mistakes one of the PCs for his contact, unaware that his enemies are right behind him.
  2. A smuggling operation is being run out of the inn which is maintained only as a cover, and is deliberately run-down and overpriced to keep patrons away. Pity the PCs, being rather naive, haven’t taken the hint.
  3. The watch arrests one of the PCs on suspicion of something nasty that he didn’t do (or maybe that he did, that’s up to the player) and arrests the other PCs as suspected confederates – in a social setting that isn’t big on fair hearings.
  4. A patron on lookout at the window warns of an approaching press-gang. Patrons scatter out various bolt-holes.
  5. Someone sets the inn on fire.
  6. The inn runs out of drinkables thanks to oppressive new taxes. The crowd get unruly and decide to complain to someone – up close and all personal, like.
  7. A con-man is fleecing the crowd. When the Watch enters, he hides his goods and booty in the kit of one of the PCs, planning to steal it back later.
  8. The barkeep gives a pointed demonstration of the racial or class prejudices of the world by telling one of the PCs, “we don’t serve your kind here.”
  9. The sun goes out and the world outside vanishes, leaving only a gray mist. Inn exits now lead directly to the dungeon, there’s no way out except through the far end, there are limited supplies, and the mob are unhappy and looking for someone to blame. All eyes turn to the strangers who have just arrived.
  10. There’s a painting, seemingly of the inn-keep, whose head turns to look the other way anytime no-one is looking – because the inn-keep has arrested his aging, tying his age to that of the painting. So long as it doesn’t age, neither does he. But there’s always a price to pay for such favors, and the bill is about to come due.
  11. What looked like an inn or tavern on the outside is really something else on the inside. If mundane, the PCs have just blown the cover of whoever’s using it. If not, the PCs are the latest suckers to be lured into a trap.
  12. The inn is the gathering-place for a coven who are about to summon something way too big for them to handle.
  13. A prophesied messiah has just been born/revealed at the tavern. Is it a con, is it a mistake, is it genuine?
  14. The floor, rotted and of shoddy construction, collapses under the feet of one or more PCs.
  15. The PCs look in the mirror behind the bar and find themselves trapped in a nightmare world while their evil duplicates are released to wreak havoc on the world.
  16. Everyone in the inn is a Doppelganger (refer Pieces Of Creation: The Hidden Truth Of Doppelgangers, and they want to add the PCs to the collection.
  17. The barkeep is secretly a Vampire who enthralls the PCs – for a while.
  18. There’s an Earthquake, leveling the inn.
  19. One of the patrons murders another. The PCs are taken in as witnesses, even if they saw nothing – and if they say they saw nothing, they will be suspected of being conspirators.
  20. One of the PCs inadvertently tries to spend counterfeit money (not knowing that it’s fake).
  21. The Inn’s ale has been poisoned by a rival, or a protection racket.
  22. The inn is completely empty and none of the doors open from the inside. Why?
  23. The innkeeper is a deranged lunatic who will attempt to kill the PCs in their sleep.
  24. The inn is a front for a conspiracy. The PCs must join, or die.
  25. The innkeeper runs an illegal slave-trade through the cellar. The PCs may be mistaken for customers (lots of innuendo, never stating out loud what “The Merchandise” is), or will be added to the collection.

May this collection bring you – and your players – much amusement! Oh, and here’s one more for good measure:

  1. The daughter of the local noble can’t sing, has two left feet, is clumsy, has a slight squeak to her voice, nags mercilessly, and is not particularly good-looking. She has slipped away to avoid an arranged marriage to the son of a ruthless noble of lower rank but great influence ($$$$$) and disguised herself as a truly awful entertainer, much to the annoyance of the patrons. She gets one of the PCs drunk (Mickey Finn if necessary), and when the son of the ruthless noble comes looking for his bride-to-be, she claims that she and the PC were wed in a civil ceremony last night…

Have fun!

Comments (4)